Despite receiving huge subsidies and curtailment payments, yet another wind farm investor is issuing profit warnings. What is going on at Greencoat UK Wind $UKW ? Sunday thread 🧵(1/n)
The UKW share price has been on a downward trend since peaking in September 2022 despite paying large dividends and buying back shares (2/n)
The large dividends can be paid because the windfarms UKW has a stake in have been paid billions in subsidies, over £8.7bn in total, of which UKW will have received a share. They also get paid to turn off when it's too windy - curtailment payments (3/n)
UKW's business model faces risks. They want to increase dividends and preserve capital, but net asset value fell in 2024 and they recently announced a plan to sell assets. This is not a recipe for increasing dividends or capital growth (4/n)
Rising interest rates mans the discount rate is rising, which has the impact of reducing asset values, partly offset by rising inflation (5/n)
Falling electricity generation is another risk and they have been woeful at forecasting generation, coming in under budget in every year since 2016 and have warned about 2025 generation too (6/n)
They're also very optimistic about asset lives. They assume 30-year lives as a base case. RWE operate London Array & expect 23 year asset life & decommissioning in 2036. UKW assume it will operate without subsidy to 2042 (7/n)
UKW is also vulnerable to falling realised electricity prices. Reform's commitment to ditch Net Zero & Claire Coutinho's promise to abolish ROC's & eliminate carbon taxes mean UKW's asset value would collapse if either gained office (8/n)
They identify £280m of guarantees and indemnities to cover decommissioning etc. But don't reduce NAV by this amount because they “do not expect Group cashflows to crystalise as a result of these guarantees” (9/n)
Looking at just three of their windfarms, we can see EBITDA plummets as ROC subsidies roll off and they need to be decommissioned. Early subsidy expiry and removal of carbon taxes will make it worse for the other assets (10/n)
The falling share price perhaps tells us that the market is catching on to the risks surrounding funds of this nature. It looks like shareholders will be left flapping in the wind for some time to come (11/n)
If you enjoyed this thread please like and share. You can sign up for free to read the full article on the link below (12/12).
How do you go bankrupt? Slowly at first, then suddenly. How does Net Zero crumble? Slowly at first, then suddenly. Net Zero is collapsing faster than the coal power stations blown up by Alok Sharma. A thread (1/n)
Not too long ago, the Climate Change and Net Zero agenda was seemingly impregnable. Party leaders agreed to put the agenda outside democratic control (2/n)
At COP26 the Tories were falling over themselves to comply with the agenda: blowing up coal power stations and aligning £trillions of global finance towards Net Zero (3/n)
New data out yesterday showed UK industrial electricity prices are the highest in the IEA. No wonder Ed Miliband is beginning to show signs of strain. What's going on under the surface? A thread (1/n)
Industrial electricity prices are indeed the highest in the IEA, 63% higher than the median and 3.5X more than Canada (2/n)
We fare better on industrial gas prices, with ours being a little below the IEA median and lower than both Germany and France. But Canadian gas prices are 6X lower than the UK (3/n)
This week’s thread kicks off a mini-series looking at the risks facing renewables investment funds such as ORIT, highlighting their share price declines amid profit warnings in the wind sector (1/13).
ORIT's share price has been in a trending down since peaking in August 2022. Despite paying out £33.5m in dividends in 2024 and buying back £6.8m of its shares (with more buybacks in 2025), the price keeps falling. The fund aims for income & growth, but it's struggling (2/13).
Dividends have risen from 3.18p per share in 2020 to 6.02p in 2024. However, the Net Asset Value (NAV) is declining, though not as sharply as the share price. ORIT's portfolio spans 41 assets across solar, batteries, hydrogen, onshore, and offshore wind (3/13).
Frankly, my dear, I don’t give a damn that windfarm operators are issuing profit warnings because it hasn’t been windy enough. What's going on? A thread 🧵(1/n)
Windfarm operators including Vattenfall, RWE and Orsted have all issued profit warnings, blaming lower than expected wind speeds. Investment funds TRIG $TRIG and Greencoat UK Wind $UKW have also issued warnings as low wind threatens dividend payouts (2/n)
We can get an idea of what is going on by looking at the Jan-Aug generation of CfD funded offshore windfarms with a track record back to 2022 (3/n)
By making a dissembling response to Claire Coutinho, the new chair of the CCC has made himself complicit in the Seventh Carbon Budget deceit. A thread 🧵 (1/n)
In her letter to the CCC, Coutinho asked why the CCC were using £38/MWh as a cost for offshore wind in 2030 when Ed Miliband is offering >3X that, or £117/MWh in Allocation Round 7. She urged Topping to correct the costings before Parliament votes on CB7 (2/n)
Topping's response was tendentious drivel, insisting that their LCOE calculations are accurate and CfD strike prices didn't reflect actual costs but rather "a policy-determined revenue guarantee" (3/n)
There's a ticking timebomb in UK offshore wind: massive decommissioning costs that aren't properly funded. Like in "The Big Short," a forensic look reveals developers might be ignoring guidelines, potentially leaving taxpayers on the hook. A thread 🧵 (1/18)
The scale is huge. In 2018, BEIS estimated £1.28-3.64bn for 37 wind farms, costs spiking from 2028. Now, with 16GW installed, my analysis shows ~£4.7bn over 10-15 years—at £293m/GW. More farms mean more costs. (2/18)
I made an FOI request to Government for the latest decommissioning cost estimates, but they won't release as "too commercially sensitive", but most windfarms show provisions in their accounts (3/18)