Holy shit. MIT just built an AI that can rewrite its own code to get smarter 🤯
It’s called SEAL (Self-Adapting Language Models).
Instead of humans fine-tuning it, SEAL reads new info, rewrites it in its own words, and runs gradient updates on itself literally performing self-directed learning.
The results?
✅ +40% boost in factual recall
✅ Outperforms GPT-4.1 using data it generated *itself*
✅ Learns new tasks without any human in the loop
LLMs that finetune themselves are no longer sci-fi.
We just entered the age of self-evolving models.
Paper: jyopari. github. io/posts/seal
Today, most AI models are static once trained, they can’t update themselves.
SEAL flips that.
It runs a reinforcement loop where the model:
1. Generates a “self-edit” (instructions on how to update itself) 2. Tests the result 3. Reinforces only what improves performance
It’s basically RL for self-improvement.
Here’s what self-editing looks like in action 👇
SEAL reads a new passage (say, about the Apollo Program) and rewrites it into logical “implications” like condensed study notes.
Then it finetunes itself on those notes.
The result?
+13.5% factual accuracy without external data.
This is how models start to teach themselves knowledge.
Few-shot learning just got a massive upgrade.
Instead of relying on fixed heuristics, SEAL decides its own training strategy.
It chooses which data augmentations to apply, how to optimize, and even sets its own learning rate.
The outcome:
→ 72.5% success rate
→ 3.6× improvement over standard test-time training
The model is literally designing its own experiments.
In just two rounds of self-reinforcement, SEAL surpassed GPT-4.1-generated data.
The model learned to write more “learnable” data for itself reformulating facts into simple, atomic truths that stick.
It’s not just learning what to know it’s learning how to learn better.
That’s recursive intelligence in motion.
Even as SEAL self-updates over time, it mostly remembers what it learned before a huge step toward continual learning.
There’s still some forgetting, but the retention curve shows promise.
Imagine future LLMs that grow their knowledge continuously without starting from scratch.
We’re watching self-evolution begin.
Stop wasting hours writing prompts
→ 10,000+ ready-to-use prompts
→ Create your own in seconds
→ Lifetime access. One-time payment.
Holy shit...Google just built an AI that learns from its own mistakes in real time.
New paper dropped on ReasoningBank. The idea is pretty simple but nobody's done it this way before. Instead of just saving chat history or raw logs, it pulls out the actual reasoning patterns, including what failed and why.
Agent fails a task? It doesn't just store "task failed at step 3." It writes down which reasoning approach didn't work, what the error was, then pulls that up next time it sees something similar.
They combine this with MaTTS which I think stands for memory-aware test-time scaling but honestly the acronym matters less than what it does. Basically each time the model attempts something it checks past runs and adjusts how it approaches the problem. No retraining.
Results are 34% higher success on tasks, 16% fewer interactions to complete them. Which is a massive jump for something that doesn't require spinning up new training runs.
I keep thinking about how different this is from the "just make it bigger" approach. We've been stuck in this loop of adding parameters like that's the only lever. But this is more like, the model gets experience. It actually remembers what worked.
Kinda reminds me of when I finally stopped making the same Docker networking mistakes because I kept a note of what broke last time instead of googling the same Stack Overflow answer every 3 months.
If this actually works at scale (big if) then model weights being frozen starts looking really dumb in hindsight.
Today, most “AI memory” is fake memory.
Agents log old trajectories and replay them later like watching CCTV of their past mistakes and learning nothing.
ReasoningBank changes that. It extracts reasoning-level lessons from both successes and failures.
That’s the real innovation: distillation, not recollection.
The memory units it stores are structured like human notes:
Title → Description → Content.
Example:
“Prioritize user account sections when retrieving personal data.”
That single rule can transfer across hundreds of tasks from web admin panels to code automation.
But 99% of people are sleeping on what it can actually do.
I’ve used it to build apps, generate content, automate deep research, and more.
Here are 10 ways to use Claude 4.5 Sonnet that feel like cheating:
1. Automated Research Reports (better than $100k consultants)
Claude’s web search + analysis mode lets you do what McKinsey, Gartner, and Deloitte charge six figures for.
You’ll get structured breakdowns, insights, and data points like a private analyst on demand.
Prompt to use:
"You are a world-class strategy consultant trained by McKinsey, BCG, and Bain. Act as if you were hired to provide a $300,000 strategic analysis for a client in the [INDUSTRY] sector.
Here is your mission:
1. Analyze the current state of the [INDUSTRY] market. 2. Identify key trends, emerging threats, and disruptive innovations. 3. Map out the top 3-5 competitors and benchmark their business models, strengths, weaknesses, pricing, distribution, and brand positioning. 4. Use frameworks like SWOT, Porter’s Five Forces, and strategic value chain analysis to assess risks and opportunities. 5. Provide a one-page strategic brief with actionable insights and recommendations for a hypothetical company entering or growing in this space.
Output everything in concise bullet points or tables. Make it structured and ready to paste into slides. Think like a McKinsey partner preparing for a C-suite meeting.