1/ What a bitter harvest it is to win the gender wars. What a many better thing it would have been to have been wrong. There’s no great joy to being a veteran and saying “yes, you did chemically castrate gay and autistic youth, we were correct”. How empty this victory is.
2/ To win and see the crushing defeat of political transvestitism, the desire to displace sex in law with a feeling based on clothing. To see your society challenged by a force that sought nothing less than to crumble the 4 walls of reality on the weak. Because that’s what it was
3/ Epistemological, moral and post modern chaos where there was no such thing as a woman other than the men who said they were women was a challenge not just to order, but to sanity or any basic truth claim, it was chaos incarnate. And chaos is a jungle. And Jungles…….
4/ Well, a jungle favours the strong. That’s why it’s called the law of the jungle. So it was never the professors theorising away biological sex who were the female prisoners sharing cells with 6 foot male rapists. Never the prom queens or handsome jocks at gender clinics.
5/ It was always the weak and the vulnerable to paid the tab for luxury beliefs. It was always those on the breadline with the courage to put everything on the line who faced cancellation, silencing and the calumny of being called full of hatred when they only wanted to raise the alarm.
6/ It’s not over, but it’s over. For Women Scotland is the end of the political project and we now have a Supreme Court judgment, our opponents have a date with reality they can adjourn as much as they like, but these are stays of execution and putting off the inevitable.
7/ The problem with being in fashion is things go out of fashion. Political transvestism’s moment has passed. It was a grim a fraught moment that inverted the purposes of every organisation meant to protect us. The gay ones became homophobic…
8/ We’ll laugh one day at Nancy Kelley of Stonewall saying lesbians were sexual racists for not sleeping with men. We’ll laugh at Peter Tacthell hooking into this compulsory bisexuality programme as he sought to resuscitate his relevance.
9/ We’ll look aghast at a gay rights movement and landscape much diminished and wonder how this might Ozymandias came to be such a wreck and how it preached the destruction of its own next generation.
10/ Yet we have won. Or more or less won. Or won enough. But the victory condition was never a sweet one. The victory condition was to persuade the world this was a crime against humanity. And so we reap this victory. But we reap a bitter harvest.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ As the bitter tide of gender recedes, @stonewalluk have some introspection and apologising to do. They called lesbians "sexual racists", they cancelled and pilloried gay men, they engineered modern gay conversion by preaching children had the wrong bodies....wrong for what?
2/ The answer to that was "the wrong bodies to be heterosexuals", because the 2012 Tavistock patient survey told us the 80% of boys and 90% of girls were same sex attracted.
They had the "wrong bodies" to be straight.
Stonewall pushed this. They aided and abetted this.
3/ The gay rights movement is a naive and new thing left with incompetents post marriage and decimated by our AIDS losses. But it anointed liars like Ruth Hunt who told frightened parents 50% of children denied puberty blockers commit suicide. This was an evil lie.
1/ It takes a rather implacable and sustained commitment to delusion to imagine that the socially necessary instances of separation of the sexes - a constant in one form or another in all human societies in history - is something we can just toss aside being better enlightened.
2/ It is said that when you look into the abyss it peers back into you, and so it is fighting litigious transvestites and their cadre of modern day clerics, only we are looking into a deeply stupid philosophy and it makes us stupid peering back into us. Blokes ain’t ladies.
3/ There are only so many times one can acknowledge universal truths like (1) men commit almost all sex offences (2) men win at almost all sports (3) a nurse with a heavy period certainly needs a space away from blokes before one suffers a sort of intellectual death by repetition
1/ The redoubtable and unsinkable @SVPhillimore can look after herself, but she won’t begrudge me I’m sure adding a few words in the wake of the sinking ship good laugh project and their joke “journalist” trying to silence a woman in public life yet again.
2/ Let’s be clear on that point, while they’ve recruited some compliant they/them “journalist” who quotes her own employer in her copy (LOL), the good laugh project often go for women whether it’s the lesbians of the LGB alliance or sneering at Allison Bailey.
3/ Or going for Baroness Falkner the head of the EHRC or her new replacement, I could go on, but you have the point, when it comes to barristers in their sights it’s women like Sarah and not blokes like Dennis. When it matters, they know what a woman really is.
1/ Would be Intervenors in the Supreme Court must obtain permission by demonstrating they are raising significant points of law of public importance. Here permission was rightly denied because the SC does not entertain anecdotes or repetition.
2/ In this misleading Guardian piece McCould singularly fails to say that both the Scottish Government and Amnesty were raising precisely the same arguments he wanted to make. Both were extremely well funded and his anecdotes would add nothing in law.
3/ It is of significance that the lesbian intervenors met this test and the Law Lords ruled that their opponents case would have rendered the same sex orientation protected characteristic “meaningless” in law. McCloud of course doesn’t bother to mention this, he doesn’t care.
1/ Where does one start with this? Russel has nothing to say when the Scottish Government argued in the Supreme Court that the protected characteristic of same sex attraction should be rendered “meaningless”. That threat to rights didn’t bother him
2/ Of course had he said something, he would have incurred the wrath of his new overlords, so he unthinkingly rails against people who object to children being taught that somehow they have the wrong bodies and need chemical and surgical interventions.
3/ Russsel doesn’t seem to appreciate 80-90% of the cohort at the Tavistock were same sex attracted, if cross sex ideation is naturally occurring in any population there is no good reason for this figure to be so high, or for autism to feature in 35% of cases.
1/ This point is really bothering me and it's one Sall brought up in her interview last night. There's something really very sinister in terms of access to justice about going after someone for laughing at a pretty laughable question while being cross examined.
2/ In the original Giggle v Tickle trial, Counsel for the Tickle asked a fairly odd question about someone selling merchandise arising from the case, it was a candle and the scent was said to be that of "sweaty balls". It was a strange line of questioning.....
3/ Not least because Sall was nothing to do with the candle, I assume it was thrown in a rather ill disciplined fashion to suggest that all terfs are ghastly and unfeeling, but in the high pressure environment of a court, it was just laughable really.