#SupremeCourt hears PIL seeking directions for mandatory access to counsel to any individual being interrogated/ questioned by the Police
Sr Adv Guruswamy refers to decision in Nandini Sathpathy
CJI: why are you before this court ?
Guruswamy: if today if its police, if an accuse or a person is called to be questioned, I have no ability to ask for a counsel , I am only asking for my ability for the presence of a counsel to prevent anything
#SupremeCourt hears the plea by Sony Entertainment seeking the transfer of the copyright dispute against 'Ilaiyaraaja Music N Management Pvt Ltd' (IMMA) to Bombay HC
Sr Adv AM Singhvi: my suit is regarding my purchase with respect to his rights
Singhvi mentions that the SC earlier had dismissed the transfer plea by IMMA
Delhi High Court to hear singer Kumar Sanu’s suit seeking protection of his personality rights.
Matter before Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora.
#KumarSanu #Personalityrights #delhihighcourt
Hearing commences.
Advocate Sana Raees Khan appears for Sanu.
Court: Counsel for defendant 7 states that plaintiff has raised grievance regarding four profiles on Facebook and Instagram. He states list of 34 urls was provided. He says urls have become unavailable .
#SupremeCourt hearing TMC MP Mahua Moitra's fresh plea seeking directions to SEBI to mandate full public disclosure of Ultimate Beneficial Owners, Last Natural Persons and Portfolios of Alternative Investment Funds, Foreign Portfolio Investors and their intermediaries in India.
Bench: Justice BV Nagarathna and Justice R Mahadevan.
Advocate Prashant Bhushan: though 1 lakh crore is being invested, the public doesn't know and even the SEBI doesn't know who is behind these investments.
Bhushan: A whole time member of SEBI was saying that several financial regulations are circumvented through these alternate investment funds. For example it will say "global opportunities fund". Who is behind it, it will say some other company. Then who is behind that other company? It will be some other company. So through these shell companies ultimately who is the beneficial owner will not be known
#SupremeCourt hears the petitions filed by the State of Tamil Nadu and TASMAC challenging Madras High Court's rejection of its plea against searches conducted by the Enforcement Directorate on the TASMAC headquarters
Sibal appears for TASMAC: how can a gvt. company be raided under PCA? everything is controlled by the govt. they raided the managing director that had nothing to do with it
Sibal: the seller who sells the liquor, if sold beyond a price will be prosecuted, this is what we are investigating