The radicals of the 1960s failed to overthrow America by force — so they set out to capture it from within.
The Left's long march through the institutions was the defining political project of the last 50 years.
Now, the Right must take those institutions back for America. 🧵
In one 18-month period between 1971-72, there were 2,500 domestic bombings on U.S. soil—a stunning rate of nearly five per day.
For many Americans, that fact is shocking. In today’s popular imagination, the politics of the 60s and 70s were Woodstock, peace signs, and hippies.
But that wasn't the feeling among most Americans who were actually alive during that era.
In 1968, amid urban riots and increasingly violent campus unrest, a Gallup poll found that a whopping four out of five Americans believed that law and order had broken down in the U.S.
The truth is, the left-wing radicalism of the 60s and 70s was far more violent—and deadlier—than the modern narrative suggests. It’s been whitewashed today, in large part because the radicals themselves conquered the mainstream liberal institutions that shape our popular memory.
As I detail in my @FoxNews op-ed today, the ringleaders of violent left-wing terrorist groups like the Weather Underground "went on to work at white-shoe law firms, major nonprofits and Ivy League universities." They even launched the political career of a future U.S. president.
The left-wing radicals lost the street war, but their worldview won the far bigger war for America’s elite institutions.
The New Left of the 1960s didn't disappear into obscurity. Instead, it took over the nation’s systems of education, law, philanthropy, media and mass culture.
Today, the progeny of groups like the Weather Underground can be seen on the streets of cities like Portland and Chicago, throwing Molotov cocktails at cops and federal agents. (Often with the backing of the very institutions their predecessors conquered.)
For decades, left-wing extremism has been normalized and celebrated across our elite institutions.
Now, America is at a tipping point. We've endured years of left-wing riots, attacks, bombings and a series of assassination attempts that culminated in the murder of Charlie Kirk.
But it’s not 1970 anymore. In fact, it’s not even 2020.
It is time for the Right to undo the revolutions of the 1960s. It's time to take back our streets, take back our culture, and take back our country.
For years, media elites told us that "right-wing political violence" is America’s great domestic extremist threat.
Even today, they continue to cite the same handful of studies to "prove" that this is true.
But those "studies" are bunk.
I’m asking DOJ to fix this. 🧵
I just sent a letter to the Department of Justice urging them to conduct a serious, empirical study on the crisis of left-wing political violence.
Currently, no study of this sort exists.
The "data" we do have on political violence is laughably flawed, partisan junk science.
Over and over again, the same few reports are used to claim that right-wing violence outweighs left-wing violence—even leftist AND Islamist violence combined.
Sounds crazy, right?
Because it is.
But even now, left-wing pundits, politicians and activists continue to cite them.
Let’s be clear: what Antifa is engaged in is not "speech." It is coordinated, organized political violence.
We can and should stand firm against political violence — and target the funding of violent conduct — while continuing to defend the right to peaceful free speech.
Some U.S. companies are using H-1B visas to staff their DEI offices.
I've reviewed numerous examples of hospitals, universities and other employers hiring foreign H-1B workers as DEI bureaucrats.
I'm urging USCIS to work with us to fix this. 🧵
Documents we reviewed show a range of U.S. employers have sought to hire foreign H-1B workers to fill their DEI positions.
For example, Yale New Haven Health filed Labor Condition Applications (LCA) for H-1B visas for the role of “Diversity and Inclusion Specialist” in 2021:
Carnegie Mellon University filed a H-1B LCA for the position of “Associate Dean of Diversity, Inclusion, Climate & Equity” in 2021.
Trustees of Dartmouth College filed for a job called “Program Manager, Diversity, Equity & Inclusion” in 2023.
In American politics today, stories, narratives, ideas, etc all take shape on the big social media platforms before making their way into the general public discourse.
Online censorship rigged the entire American political debate in the Left's favor.
A lot of people might not get their news from the internet. But the people THEY get their news from—journalists, pundits, talk-show hosts—do. It's where the conversation starts.
Throughout the 2010s, much of the Right didn't even have full access to the conversation at all.
This week, we learned that Joe Biden's FBI was actively targeting 92 conservative groups and individuals in a massive fishing expedition.
The list includes Charlie Kirk's organization, Turning Point USA. 🧵
The FBI's "Operation Arctic Frost" was launched in 2022, under the pretenses of investigating the Trump campaign and its conservative allies.
It was led by Tim Thibault—an FBI agent who was later forced to resign for his partisan corruption.
Arctic Frost quickly ballooned into a Soviet "show me the man, I'll show you the crime" fishing expedition against the entire political Right—issuing over 400 subpoenas targeting 92 conservative groups/actors.
It later morphed into the Jack Smith special counsel investigation.
After President Trump fired her for cause (alleged mortgage fraud), former Fed Governor Cook is expected to sue.
This massive administrative state/separation of powers case will likely go to the Supreme Court.
Let's break down why President Trump is expected to win. 🧵
As the Supreme Court clarified a few months ago: the default rule is that Article II of the Constitution grants the President the authority to remove any federal official wielding executive power for any reason the President deems appropriate, including policy disagreements.
Decades ago, a series of Supreme Court cases established a few narrow exceptions to the default rule.
In recent years, however, SCOTUS reaffirmed the default rule and the President's authority by significantly narrowing those already limited exceptions.