#BiharSIR: #SupremeCourt to hear today the pleas challenging Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision of Bihar's electoral rolls
Bench: Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi
On Oct 9, the Court passed an interim order to ensure free legal aid for persons excluded from the final voters' list so they can file appeals against their exclusion
#BiharElection2025
Further, activist Yogendra Yadav urged the Court to direct ECI to disclose how many persons were found to be foreigners after the exercise
He said that the Court would be doing a "great service to the nation" by directing ECI to disclose the number of persons whose names have been deleted on ground that they were not citizens.
#SupremeCourt #BiharSIR
On Oct 7, the Court orally said that there was some confusion as to whether voters added in the final electoral list were from the list of voters who were previously deleted from the draft list or totally new names
Petitioners demanded that the ECI must publish the list of names of 3.66 lakh voters who were additionally deleted from the final list, and the names of the 21 lakh voters who were included in it.
#SupremeCourt #BiharSIR
#BiharSIR hearing begins
Sr Advs Dr AM Singhvi, Gopal Sankaranarayanan and Advs Prashant Bhushan, Vrinda Grover appear for petitioners
Sr Adv Rakesh Dwivedi appears for ECI
J Kant: First, we will hear ECI.
#SupremeCourt
Bhushan: I just want to mention about affidavit tendered by me...we have verified and filed affidavit...all details of that voter...
J Kant: That has no impact on merits of the case
Grover: They were to file reply on my IA. We are on data...
Dwivedi: We will file separate reply
Bhushan: So far as Bihar is concerned, now it will be difficult to do enquiry. But their rules, guidelines, manual, 2003 guidelines [must be followed].
#SupremeCourt #BiharSIR
Bhushan: We have said in 8 Oct affidavit that they have no disclosed complete list of new deletions of electors on draft rolls but not on final rolls...what are the new deletions not disclosed...tomorrow and 20th they will freeze final roll, it won't be identical to roll that they will publish...unfortunately, they have not been putting out the final roll on their website. That needs to be done immediately
Dwivedi: It's already on website
Bhushan: That's the 30 Sept list. After that, they said they will make modifications till...roll of names that will go to polls needs to be put out
J Kant: Final list will have to be in every polling station, with every political party
Bhushan: Some voters are saying they did not receive notice, reasons. How to verify it? Only way is to put it on website
#SupremeCourt #BiharSIR
J Kant: We have no doubt that they will fulfill their responsibility...they are bound to publish...we are not closing the matter, Mr Bhushan
Bhushan: After deleting 65 lakhs, they have deleted some more...but have not put out the list
J Kant: It's an ongoing exercise, it is yet to culminate in a list
Bhushan: Rules require real time transparency regarding this. New inclusions also not given
Dwivedi: Voters know everything. He can wait for data analytics and guide ECI in future.
#BiharSIR
Bhushan: Why should these things not be on ECI website?
J Kant: 17th will be the last date for publishing final list (for first phase)? Let's see what they publish. Suppose final list gives an indication who was added, deleted...there are some typographical mistakes...as Mr Yadav pointed out...we expect them to look into these things as a responsible authority and come out with remedial measures
Bhushan: If they were truly responsible, we would expect
Order (on Grover's IA): Mr Dwivedi submits that though issue has been addressed in comprehensive affidavit filed today, however, he seeks and is granted 10 days time to file reply.
#BiharSIR
Dwivedi: In our affidavit, we have brought out how they continue to forge documents. False documents have been filed. If they wish to respond, they may
Bhushan: Last time, they took up one affidavit, said there is no such person, no EPIC number...we have verified, everything was correct except one thing...his name was not in draft roll, it was there in january 2025 draft roll...the drop down menu is common, so there was a mistake in that regard.
#BiharSIR
Bhushan: This should be heard immediately after vacation. Otherwise, Bihar election will become fait accompli without transparency
Gopal S: This is an entirely unconstitutional exercise. We have completed constitutional arguments on this. They are to response, if a date can be fixed...
J Kant: Mr Dwivedi you can argue on legal aspects on Nov 4. I'm in CB now.
#BiharSIR
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#SupremeCourt hears plea challenging Telangana HC order which stayed the govt decision to raise quota for Backward Classes in municipalities and panchayats to 42%, which pushed the total reservations in local bodies to 67%
Bench: Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta
Sr Adv Dr AM Singhvi (for State): This Court did not fix a limit of 50% [on reservation]...let me show 1 paragraph of Indra Sawhney judgment
Sr Adv Gopal S (for respondents) objects: The GO increased reservation to 42%...taking total to more than 60%...CB judgment in Krishna Murthy specifically says 50%...Indra Sawhney dealt with socially backward classes etc., there you can.
#SupremeCourt #Telangana
For context, Krishna Murthy judgment held:
"The upper ceiling of 50% vertical reservations in favour of SCs/STs/OBCs should not be breached in the context of local self-government. Exceptions can only be made in order to safeguard the interests of the Scheduled Tribes in the matter of their representation in panchayats located in the Scheduled Areas."
#BREAKING Attorney General for India consents to initiation of criminal contempt action against Advocate Rakesh Kishore, who attempted to throw a shoe at Chief Justice of India BR Gavai inside the Supreme Court
Sr Adv Vikas Singh (SCBA President) and SG Tushar Mehta mention matter before J Surya Kant-led bench
Singh: It's going on and on over social media...he is further saying I have no remorse
SG: Some people are glorifying it...saying it's too late to have done this
J Surya Kant: Hon'ble CJI has been magnanimous...that shows the institution is not affected by these kind of incidents
Singh: Lord Vishnu will not say you take to violence to do something like this...it's an insult to God also whom he has sought to...
J Kant: Violence can never be promoted. Just think, what will happen when you initiate this kind of proceedings? Social media, everything becomes a saleable item
Singh: Please consider John-Doe order
J Bagchi: It's for us and our behavior in courts that we survive. It's that spirit which Hon'ble CJI exhibited. Just washed it aside. You have come before us, our request is to consider whether against breaking up an issue which for us is complete, will it help giving opportunity to these chirping elements to go on?
#SupremeCourt
J Bagchi: Many important matters before us...will this not [waste time]
Singh: We are seeking restraint on glorifying of shoe-throwing
J Kant: The moment you take any action now it will become episode No.2.
#SupremeCourt hears PIL seeking directions for mandatory access to counsel to any individual being interrogated/ questioned by the Police
Sr Adv Guruswamy refers to decision in Nandini Sathpathy
CJI: why are you before this court ?
Guruswamy: if today if its police, if an accuse or a person is called to be questioned, I have no ability to ask for a counsel , I am only asking for my ability for the presence of a counsel to prevent anything
#SupremeCourt hears the plea by Sony Entertainment seeking the transfer of the copyright dispute against 'Ilaiyaraaja Music N Management Pvt Ltd' (IMMA) to Bombay HC
Sr Adv AM Singhvi: my suit is regarding my purchase with respect to his rights
Singhvi mentions that the SC earlier had dismissed the transfer plea by IMMA
Delhi High Court to hear singer Kumar Sanu’s suit seeking protection of his personality rights.
Matter before Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora.
#KumarSanu #Personalityrights #delhihighcourt
Hearing commences.
Advocate Sana Raees Khan appears for Sanu.
Court: Counsel for defendant 7 states that plaintiff has raised grievance regarding four profiles on Facebook and Instagram. He states list of 34 urls was provided. He says urls have become unavailable .