Between Sept 2019 and July 2021, Iran hacked Bolton's personal email account and accessed the classified and national defense information he had put in it.
Bolton alerted the US Gov't to the hack, but did not inform them of the classified and national defense information that was on it.
On a regular basis, Bolton sent "diary" entries via unsecured applications to two family members which described his "day-to-day activities as the National Security Advisor."
These "diary" entries contained TOP SECRET/SCI-level national defense information.
Just complete disregard for proper handling of classified information.
He was writing his memoir day-to-day while he was serving as the NSA.
He'd send chunks of it, the "diary" entries, to two family members for them to edit and correct.
As soon as he was fired, he was ready to talk to book publishers.
What a scumbag.
Bolton violated the settlement agreement.
Oh, hypocrisy.
Forfeiture
Is DOJ going to relieve Bolton of all of the money that memoir made him?
I hope so!!
Iran.
Who for years were trying to kill Bolton and other members of the first Trump admin.
"The United States gathered data from an adversarial country’s spy service..."
So we found the classified material were in the possession of Iran...
I wonder if that was developed from the Asif Merchant case?
Merchant came to the U.S. to recruit hitmen assassinate U.S. officials.
And it's highly likely that Bolton was on his list.
So did the FBI learn of Iran's possession of the classified material in Bolton's emails from the devices they seized from Merchant?
I don't know. Could be.
Crazy to think about Iran wanting to kill him, plotting it, sending people to the U.S. to kill him, and also having access to his email and extracting so much info from that.
Not just the classified stuff, but the pattern of life details they could get.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Another filing from Halligan seeking to clarify the grand jury proceedings that have been the focus of scrutiny over recent days and really, since day one in this case—as the just-filed Transcript of Return of Grand Jury Indictment Proceedings shows.
For reference, here are the "no true bill" 3-count and the "true bill" 2-count indictments.
As you can see, Count Two and, uh, the other Count Two of the 3-count are IDENTICAL to Count One and Count Two of the 2-count.
Both were filed, as both were presented in open court.
The notice accompanying the transcript says
"The official transcript of the September 25, 2025, proceedings before Magistrate Judge Vaala conclusively refutes [the] claim [that there was an issue with the grand jury voting process] and establishes that the grand jury voted on—and true-billed—the two-count indictment."
NEW filing by US Attorney Halligan clarifies that "the foreperson of the grand jury 'reported that 12 or more grand jurors did not concur in finding an indictment' as to proposed 'Count 1 only,'" but did concur on Counts 2 & 3.
The 3-count indictment was edited into a 2-count indictment, numbers adjusted, and the foreperson signed the new one.
"Fed. R. Crim. P. [] Rule 6 simply does not require a successive-voting procedure where there is a mixed return from the grand jury on a multi-count indictment."
It appears, based on filings and testimony from Halligan and her office, that the two-count indictment against James Comey was not properly presented and returned by the full grand jury.