Andy Constan Profile picture
Oct 18 19 tweets 4 min read Read on X
I YR return Asset bull cases part 1

SPX

SPX has a trailing earnings yield of 4% with expected 1 year earnings growth of 11.7%. What's the bull case? For me the bull case is a combination of simply collecting the earnings accrual
and having the multiple expand slightly. In that case a 16% return would occur which is roughly 1 std higher and happens 1 out of 6 timer.

The big driver of equity returns is the accrual of earnings. Over the last 5 years earnings accrual has dominated historic returns
As long as companies continue to grow earnings they will go up over the long term.

Multiples rise and fall and as can be seen in the chart can dominate performance of equities in the short term. Furthermore multiples are impacted by interest rates
and secular changes in composition of industry but are also highly impacted by earnings expectations. Meaning while actually accrued earnings dominates long term returns expectations of earnings growth both short and long term are reflected in multiples.
Multiples are also impacted by various other forms of what I refer to as risk premium which P/E's expand when money is easy and risk is low and contract when money is tight and risk is high.
Which gives the bullish framework to be bullish equities one needs to believe

1. Earnings will accrue as expected
2. Earnings accrual expectations will rise
3. Risk premiums will contract /PE's expand

All three matter but the long term tailwind is # 1
The trailing 12 months have delivered earnings accrual growth of 12.5% YoY Quite a tailwind
Analysts project a similar earnings accrual growth of 11.7% for the next twelve months. Which is quite a tailwind as well
A year from now if things just sort of go as expected stocks should earn 16% based on no change in multiple and current earnings yield and growth. Pretty sweet bull case basic tailwind for sure.

Earnings multiples are pretty elevated though. While there are many factors at
Play assuming earnings deliver as expected multiples would have to contract by 12% for equity price returns to simply match cash. Current trailing multiple is 25x which is pretty elevated but it would have to fall to roughly 22 to match cash if earnings deliver.
The bull case is pretty easy. Ride the expected earnings accrual tailwind.

OTOH realized earnings growth has been very strong for the last 5 years. Which makes me wonder if the tailwind will deliver or not.
The trailing 5 year earnings growth which is mostly projected to remain about the same in the foreseeable future depended on
1. Highly stimulative deficit growth in 2020 and 2021, leading to a robust wealth and income cycle
2. Deficit growth = corporate profit growth
3. Monetary conditions that were not able to tighten as every tempest in a teacup or downward blip in the market was met with rapid emergency easing by policymakers
4. AI spending and consumption

The bull case assumes all of these things will remain true.
In plain fact the

1 and 2) deficit level is high but it's change is negative and that is what matters to earning growth so that's a headwind which makes the expected earnings growth vulnerable
3) inflation is NOT dead yet and monetary conditions need to ease more than priced
4) further AI investment needs to generate AI income to remain sustainable which means that income has to come from somewhere which means less income for other companies

Anyway the bull case is easy. Keep earnings growth high and financial conditions easy and double digit
Returns are in the bag.

The bull case is so easy that I just have to at least mention the bear case. Without fiscal deficit increase and frankly with tariffs reducing the deficit the deficit=corporate profits equation reverses. Now sticking with the bull case
Private sector leverage is very low (though claims on future Leveraging up to fund AI capex are ginourmous and built into earnings) so it's possible that a leveraging up by corporations and consumers can generate late cycle profit growth. The fiscal side is a headwind
to profits. That can change with a stroke of the Supreme courts pen I guess but current policy is a headwind of equities. Nonetheless even earnings growth of half of expectations is a pretty sweet tailwind for equities which all else equal would still outperform cash
Image
Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andy Constan

Andy Constan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @dampedspring

Oct 18
I YR return Asset bull cases part 1a
10 Year notes

10 year notes yield 4% today. What's the bull case? Let's talk about an unusually good absolute return that would happen 1 in 6 times this year meaning 1STD or more. That would be a 6% price rise Along with a 6% price move
One would also get a 4% coupon generating a 10% return and an excess return over cash of 6.5%. That's pretty good and could be leveraged 2.5x to have the same risk as SPX and generate 16.25% return.

What would that mean mechanically?
A 6% price move would require 9 year yields which are roughly 3.95% to be 3.22
A year from now.

The bull case for bonds depends on whether the odds of 3.22% yields occuring is 1:6. If the odds are higher the bonds are a buy if lower then bonds are a sell.

Bond yields change
Read 29 tweets
Oct 17
Solvency/Liquidity/bank reserves 101

I see we are all focused on $kre again.

Let's review how banks get in trouble.

By far the most important one is they become insolvent
An insolvent company has negative equity. Its assets are worth less than its debt. For a bank the largest debtor is the depositor but other debtors exist as well.

Banks risk insolvency due to higher leverage of their equity relative to any other non financial company
Bank assets are also subject to sudden repricing when the loans and securities banks own default or like in the "Banking Crisis of 2023" the assets reprice rapidly due to a change in the risk free interest rate.
Read 23 tweets
Oct 15
This chart Should not be new to anyone that has my work since 2022. @SteveMiran used and credited my work to write his paper on ATI which probably helped him get the Fed Governor Gig😅.I have presented my work to many Fed staffers and senior treasury officials many times. BUT 🧵
The Fed bears only partial responsibility to the muting of QT. QT impact is two fold reducing reserves HAS occurred. Though not much and mostly just reduced pseudo reserves in the form or RRP reduction to zero.

BUT by far the biggest impact of QT is the forcing of the private
Sector to absorb duration. As written in my DSR of 3/14/2022 before QT had even formally been announced I described how choosing runoff vs outright sales when implementing QT was handing monetary policy to the treasury. dampedspring.com/wp-content/upl…
Read 22 tweets
Sep 18
Assets vs cash NOT one asset vs another. 101

I raised cash yesterday by selling 20% of my liquid net worth of assets holdings. I sold gold, long term bonds and stocks without view on one asset vs another. Just raised cash while keeping my asset allocation roughly constant.
I now hold 50% of my AUM in cash. Why would I do that. What makes me want less of an asset portfolio I'll refer to now as Beta and more cash.

Well my decision hinges on various factors and all are based on expectations
For centuries and certainly recently policymakers have debased their currency which makes holding assets more attractive than holding cash currency. But we all know this. So to trigger a change in one's portfolio you have to expect a different amount of debasement relative
Read 14 tweets
Sep 16
COT Vs TFF.

There is a chart going around using the COT data which suggest non commercial (speculators) are historically short equity futures. Firstly yep they (whomever "they are") are short and medium large but not historic

BUT Far more importantly the Non commerical is a terrible kluge of data including leverage longs and shorts and real investors. We never ever use COT data for equities because TFF is available and purpose built. Those who use COT are dinosaurs.Image
TFF is moderately more useful because the cohorts are more sensible.

AIN is Unlevered long only asset managers. They are pretty long.but not as long as theyve been and I could accept the idea that they need to buy to keep up. BUt they are pretty long just not all time long Image
LFN is hedge funds. They use futures to hedge their stock picking books and to speculate long and short. They are biased short because they are biased long single names and need a hedge. They are medium short today. Notice they were really short in Q1 and covered on the bottom. Now they have been scaling shortsImage
Read 5 tweets
Sep 4
Lightning network as a way for $MSTR to earn on its BTC holdings 101

I am a sucker. As you may know I have been obsessed with how MSTR or any other BTC treasury company can earn money on its holdings in excess of appreciation.

People including my friend @LynAldenContact
Whisper words that my old brain gives unmediated validity to because I'm a newbie dumb fuck on the topic. The Lightning network was one of those whispers.

My friend Claude and I did some work Image
Turns out the entire lightning network today has a fee generation of 10MN dollars. Maybe Claude is wrong but anyway seems reasonable.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(