everyone's arguing about whether ChatGPT or Claude is "smarter."
nobody noticed Anthropic just dropped something that makes the model debate irrelevant.
it's called Skills. and it's the first AI feature that actually solves the problem everyone complains about:
"why do I have to explain the same thing to AI every single time?"
here's what's different:
- you know how you've explained your brand guidelines to ChatGPT 47 times?
- or how you keep telling it "structure reports like this" over and over?
- or how every new chat means re-uploading context and re-explaining your process?
Skills ends that cycle.
you teach Claude your workflow once.
it applies it automatically. everywhere. forever.
but the real story isn't memory. it's how this changes what's possible with AI at work.
here's the technical unlock that makes this actually work:
Skills use "progressive disclosure" instead of dumping everything into context.
normal AI workflow:
→ shove everything into the prompt
→ hope the model finds what it needs
→ burn tokens
→ get inconsistent results
Skills workflow:
→ Claude sees skill names (30-50 tokens each)
→ you ask for something specific
→ it loads ONLY relevant skills
→ coordinates multiple skills automatically
→ executes
example: you ask for a quarterly investor deck
Claude detects it needs:
- brand guidelines skill
- financial reporting skill
- presentation formatting skill
loads all three. coordinates them. outputs a deck that's on-brand, accurate, and properly formatted.
you didn't specify which skills to use.
you didn't explain how they work together.
Claude figured it out.
this is why it scales where prompting doesn't.
let me show you what this looks like in real workflows.
• color codes (#FF6B35 coral, #004E89 navy)
• font rules (Montserrat headers, Open Sans body)
• logo placement rules (0.5" minimum spacing)
• template files
prompt: "create 10-slide deck for Q4 product launch"
- Claude auto-applies brand skill
- output matches guidelines first try
- 30 seconds instead of 4 hours
Rakuten (Japanese e-commerce giant) is already doing this.
finance workflows that took a full day? now 1 hour.
the repetitive nightmare:
- new lead comes in
- manually create CRM contact
- fill in 12 fields following "the naming convention"
- update opportunity stage
- log activity notes in specific format
- set follow-up reminder
- 8 minutes per lead × 30 leads/week = 4 hours gone
Skills implementation:
create "CRM_Automation" skill that knows:
- your naming conventions (FirstName_LastName_Company format)
- required fields and validation rules
- opportunity stages and when to use them
- note formatting structure
- follow-up timing rules
now: paste lead info → Claude structures everything correctly → done
time per lead: 30 seconds
weekly savings: 3.75 hours
monthly savings: 15 hours (almost 2 full workdays)
at $50/hour, that's $750/month saved per sales rep.
team of 10 reps? $90k/year in recovered time.
Step 3: Upload to Claude
Settings → Capabilities → enable "Code execution"
upload your .zip under Skills
test with: "create a presentation following brand guidelines"
pro tip: use the "skill-creator" skill just say "help me create a brand guidelines skill" and Claude interviews you, generates the folder structure, and formats everything automatically.
the companies dominating with AI aren't using better prompts.
they're building systems that codify how they work.
I've written 500 articles, 23 whitepapers, and 3 ebooks using Claude over 2 years, and these 10 prompts are the ONLY ones I actually use anymore because they handle 90% of professional writing better than any human editor I've worked with and cost me $0.02 per 1000 words: 👇
1. The 5-Minute First Draft
Prompt:
"Turn these rough notes into an article:
[paste your brain dump]
Target length: [800/1500/3000] words
Audience: [describe reader]
Goal: [inform/persuade/teach]
Keep my ideas and examples. Fix structure and flow."
2. Headline Machine (Steal This)
Prompt:
"Topic: [your topic]
Write 20 headlines using these formulas:
- How to [benefit] without [pain point]
- [Number] ways [audience] can [outcome]
- The [adjective] guide to [topic]
- Why [common belief] is wrong about [topic]
- [Do something] like [authority figure]
- I [did thing] and here's what happened
- What [success case] knows about [topic] that you don't
- automating marketing tasks
- building full websites and apps
- writing viral X threads, LinkedIn posts, and YouTube scripts
And it did all this in minutes.
Here are 10 prompts you can steal to unlock its full potential:
1. THE CAMPAIGN STRATEGIST
Opus 4.6's 200K context window means it remembers your entire brand voice across all campaigns.
Prompt:
"You are my senior marketing strategist with 10 years of experience in [your industry]. First, analyze my brand voice by reviewing these materials: [paste 3-5 previous posts, your about page, and any brand guidelines].
Then create a comprehensive 30-day content calendar that includes: daily post ideas with specific angles, optimal posting times based on my audience timezone [specify timezone], platform-specific adaptations (Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram), CTAs tailored to each post's goal, and content themes organized by week.
For the top 5 highest-potential posts, create A/B test variations testing different: hooks, CTAs, content formats (thread vs single post vs carousel), and emotional angles. Include your reasoning for why each variation might outperform.
Finally, identify 3 content gaps my competitors are filling that I'm currently missing."
Opus maintains perfect consistency across 200K tokens. Other models lose your voice after 3-4 posts.
2. THE SPY MACHINE
Opus 4.6 processes competitor data 3x faster than GPT-4 and catches patterns humans miss.
Prompt:
"Act as a competitive intelligence analyst. I need you to reverse-engineer my competitors' entire marketing strategy.
Analyze these 10 competitor assets: [paste competitor landing pages, ad copy, email sequences, social posts, or URLs].
For each competitor, extract and document: 1. Core value proposition and positioning angle 2. Specific CTAs used and where they're placed 3. Social proof tactics (testimonials, logos, stats, case studies) 4. Pricing psychology (anchoring, tiering, urgency tactics) 5. Content strategy patterns (topics, frequency, formats) 6. Unique differentiators they emphasize
Then give me:
- 5 strategies they're ALL using that I'm missing (ranked by potential revenue impact)
- 3 positioning gaps in the market none of them are addressing
- 2 specific weaknesses in their approach I can exploit
- 1 bold contrarian strategy that goes against what everyone's doing
Present findings in a strategic brief format with implementation difficulty and expected timeline for each tactic."
Opus reads entire competitor websites in one shot. No "context too long" errors.