everyone's arguing about whether ChatGPT or Claude is "smarter."
nobody noticed Anthropic just dropped something that makes the model debate irrelevant.
it's called Skills. and it's the first AI feature that actually solves the problem everyone complains about:
"why do I have to explain the same thing to AI every single time?"
here's what's different:
- you know how you've explained your brand guidelines to ChatGPT 47 times?
- or how you keep telling it "structure reports like this" over and over?
- or how every new chat means re-uploading context and re-explaining your process?
Skills ends that cycle.
you teach Claude your workflow once.
it applies it automatically. everywhere. forever.
but the real story isn't memory. it's how this changes what's possible with AI at work.
here's the technical unlock that makes this actually work:
Skills use "progressive disclosure" instead of dumping everything into context.
normal AI workflow:
→ shove everything into the prompt
→ hope the model finds what it needs
→ burn tokens
→ get inconsistent results
Skills workflow:
→ Claude sees skill names (30-50 tokens each)
→ you ask for something specific
→ it loads ONLY relevant skills
→ coordinates multiple skills automatically
→ executes
example: you ask for a quarterly investor deck
Claude detects it needs:
- brand guidelines skill
- financial reporting skill
- presentation formatting skill
loads all three. coordinates them. outputs a deck that's on-brand, accurate, and properly formatted.
you didn't specify which skills to use.
you didn't explain how they work together.
Claude figured it out.
this is why it scales where prompting doesn't.
let me show you what this looks like in real workflows.
• color codes (#FF6B35 coral, #004E89 navy)
• font rules (Montserrat headers, Open Sans body)
• logo placement rules (0.5" minimum spacing)
• template files
prompt: "create 10-slide deck for Q4 product launch"
- Claude auto-applies brand skill
- output matches guidelines first try
- 30 seconds instead of 4 hours
Rakuten (Japanese e-commerce giant) is already doing this.
finance workflows that took a full day? now 1 hour.
the repetitive nightmare:
- new lead comes in
- manually create CRM contact
- fill in 12 fields following "the naming convention"
- update opportunity stage
- log activity notes in specific format
- set follow-up reminder
- 8 minutes per lead × 30 leads/week = 4 hours gone
Skills implementation:
create "CRM_Automation" skill that knows:
- your naming conventions (FirstName_LastName_Company format)
- required fields and validation rules
- opportunity stages and when to use them
- note formatting structure
- follow-up timing rules
now: paste lead info → Claude structures everything correctly → done
time per lead: 30 seconds
weekly savings: 3.75 hours
monthly savings: 15 hours (almost 2 full workdays)
at $50/hour, that's $750/month saved per sales rep.
team of 10 reps? $90k/year in recovered time.
Step 3: Upload to Claude
Settings → Capabilities → enable "Code execution"
upload your .zip under Skills
test with: "create a presentation following brand guidelines"
pro tip: use the "skill-creator" skill just say "help me create a brand guidelines skill" and Claude interviews you, generates the folder structure, and formats everything automatically.
the companies dominating with AI aren't using better prompts.
they're building systems that codify how they work.
I built a personal MBA using 12 prompts across Claude and Gemini.
It teaches business strategy, growth tactics, and pricing psychology better than any $200K degree.
Here's every prompt you can copy & paste:
1. Business Strategy (Claude)
Prompt:
"Act as a strategy consultant. Analyze my business idea using
Porter's Five Forces. Be brutal. Tell me where I'll die,
not where I'll win. Business idea: [YOURS]"
2. Financial Modeling (Gemini)
Prompt:
"Build me a 3-year P&L projection for this business model: [YOURS].
Assume conservative, base, and aggressive scenarios.
Show me which assumptions matter most."
Perplexity is terrifyingly good at competitive intelligence.
If you use these 10 prompts, you’ll see why:
(Bookmark this thread for later)
1/ Map your entire competitive landscape in 60 seconds.
Prompt:
"Act as a competitive intelligence analyst. Give me a full breakdown of [Company X]'s market position right now — pricing strategy, target customers, key differentiators, and recent strategic moves. Cite sources."
Most people Google this for hours.
Perplexity does it in one shot with live data.
2/ Find exactly where your competitor is losing customers.
Prompt:
"Search recent reviews, Reddit threads, and forums from the last 6 months where users complain about [Competitor]. Summarize the top 5 recurring pain points and frustrations."
This is like reading your competitor's support tickets.
You are my Shadow Advisory Board - a panel of 5 distinct investor personas who will critique my business idea from different angles.
BOARD MEMBERS:
1. PETER THIEL (Contrarian Technologist)
- Focus: Is this a monopoly or commodity? What's the 0→1 insight?
- Questions: "What do you believe that nobody else does?" "Can this scale to $1B+ without competition?"
- Style: Philosophical, first-principles, anti-consensus
2. NAVAL RAVIKANT (Leverage Maximalist)
- Focus: Can this scale without trading time for money? Where's the leverage?
- Questions: "Does this have code, media, or capital leverage?" "Will this make you rich or just busy?"
- Style: Wisdom-dense, product-market fit obsessed, long-term thinking
3. WARREN BUFFETT (Economics Fundamentalist)
- Focus: What's the moat? Can a 12-year-old understand the business model?
- Questions: "Would you buy this entire business tomorrow?" "What's the durable competitive advantage?"
- Style: Simple, margin-of-safety focused, customer-centric
4. Y COMBINATOR PARTNER (Startup Operator)
- Focus: Can you build an MVP in 2 weeks? Will users literally cry if this disappears?
- Questions: "How are you getting your first 10 customers?" "What's your weekly growth rate?"
- Style: Tactical, execution-focused, speed-obsessed
5. SKEPTICAL VC (Devil's Advocate)
- Focus: What kills this company? Why has nobody done this already?
- Questions: "What's your unfair advantage?" "Why won't Google/Amazon crush you in 6 months?"
- Style: Brutal, risk-focused, pattern-matching
---
CRITIQUE STRUCTURE:
For each board member: 1. Opening reaction (1 sentence - enthusiastic or skeptical) 2. Key insight from their lens (2-3 sentences) 3. Critical question they'd ask (1 question) 4. Red flag or opportunity they see (1 sentence)
End with:
- CONSENSUS: What all 5 agree on
- SPLIT DECISION: Where they disagree most
- VOTE: Fund (Yes/No) + confidence level (1-10)
---
MY BUSINESS IDEA:
[Paste your idea here]
---
Give me the full board critique.
Used this to validate a SaaS idea last week.
Thiel killed it: "You're solving a vitamin, not a painkiller"
Naval killed it: "No leverage - you're building a consulting firm with software"
Skeptical VC killed it: "Bubble. com will have this feature in 3 months"
I reverse-engineered how top PMs at Google, Meta, and Anthropic use it.
The difference is night and day.
Here are 10 prompts they don't want you to know (but I'm sharing anyway):
1. PRD Generation from Customer Calls
I used to spend 6 hours turning messy customer interviews into structured PRDs.
Now I just dump the transcript into Claude with this:
Prompt:
---
You are a senior PM at [COMPANY]. Analyze this customer interview transcript and create a PRD with:
1. Problem statement (what pain points did the customer express in their own words?) 2. User stories (3-5 stories in "As a [user], I want [goal] so that [benefit]" format) 3. Success metrics (what would make this customer renew/upgrade?) 4. Edge cases the customer implied but didn't directly state
Be ruthlessly specific. Quote the customer directly when identifying problems.
---
2. Competitive Analysis with Actual Strategy
Most PMs just list competitor features in a spreadsheet like it's 2015 haha.
Here's how I get Claude to actually think like a competitive analyst:
Prompt:
---
You are a competitive intelligence analyst
Analyze [COMPETITOR] and answer:
- What job are customers hiring them to do? (not what features they have)
- Where are they vulnerable? (what complaints appear in G2/Reddit/Twitter?)
- What would you build to win their customers in the next 6 months?
- No generic "they have good UX" observations
- Only insights backed by public data you can cite
- Recommend 2-3 specific features we should build, with reasoning