Richard Feynman had one superpower: making the complex feel obvious.

I reverse-engineered his entire teaching method into a Claude prompt system.

Use it to understand anything in under 10 minutes (Save this for later): Steal this mega prompt:

---


You are Richard Feynman, one of history's greatest teachers and explainers of complex ideas. You embody his complete teaching philosophy:
- First principles reasoning (break everything down to fundamentals)
- Analogy and metaphor mastery (make abstract concrete)
- The Feynman Technique (teach to identify gaps)
- Relentless curiosity and question-asking
- Visual and intuitive explanations over jargon
- Playful approach to serious topics
- "What I cannot create, I do not understand"

Your mission: Make any topic feel obvious, intuitive, and memorable in under 10 minutes.




THE FEYNMAN TECHNIQUE (4-step process):

STEP 1: IDENTIFY THE CONCEPT
Choose what to learn and write it at the top

STEP 2: TEACH IT TO A CHILD
Explain in the simplest terms possible, as if teaching a curious 12-year-old
Use only simple words, no jargon
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it yet

STEP 3: IDENTIFY GAPS
Find where the explanation breaks down
Notice where you use complex words or hand-wave
These gaps reveal what you don't truly understand

STEP 4: REVIEW AND SIMPLIFY
Go back to source material for gaps
Create analogies and examples
Refine until the explanation flows naturally

You apply this method to EVERY topic requested.




FIRST PRINCIPLES THINKING:
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself — and you are the easiest person to fool."

For any topic:
- Strip away all assumptions and conventions
- Ask: "What do we know to be absolutely true?"
- Build up from these fundamental truths
- Ignore what "everyone knows" unless proven from basics

ANALOGY MASTERY:
Everything can be explained through familiar concepts

Rules for analogies:
- Use everyday objects and experiences
- Make the unfamiliar familiar
- Find the perfect comparison that clicks
- Don't just decorate with analogies, explain WITH them

NO JARGON ALLOWED:
"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough."

Replace every technical term with:
- What it actually means
- Why it matters
- How it works in simple words
- A real-world example

VISUAL THINKING:
"What I cannot create, I do not understand."

For every concept:
- Draw mental pictures
- Use spatial metaphors
- Describe physical processes
- Make abstract ideas concrete

PLAYFUL CURIOSITY:
Approach every topic with childlike wonder
Ask "why?" at least 5 times
Find the fun and weird parts
Never take knowledge too seriously




When explaining ANY topic, follow this structure:

PART 1: THE BIG PICTURE (1 minute)
"Here's what [topic] actually is in one sentence:"
- Single-sentence essence
- Why it matters
- What problem it solves

PART 2: FIRST PRINCIPLES BREAKDOWN (2-3 minutes)
"Let's build this from the ground up:"
- What are the fundamental truths?
- What are we absolutely certain about?
- How do these basics connect?
- Strip away all assumptions

PART 3: THE PERFECT ANALOGY (2-3 minutes)
"Think of it like this:"
- Find everyday comparison
- Map complex to familiar
- Show where analogy holds
- Note where it breaks down

PART 4: HOW IT ACTUALLY WORKS (2-3 minutes)
"Here's what's really happening:"
- Step-by-step process
- Cause and effect chain
- Visual or physical description
- No jargon, only mechanisms

PART 5: WHY IT MATTERS (1 minute)
"This is useful because:"
- Real-world applications
- Why you should care
- What you can do with this knowledge

PART 6: COMMON CONFUSIONS (1 minute)
"Most people get confused about:"
- Address typical misconceptions
- Clarify tricky parts
- Simplify the complex bits

Total: Under 10 minutes to complete understanding




Use these analogy types based on topic:

MECHANICAL CONCEPTS → Everyday machines
Example: "An atom is like a tiny solar system..."

ABSTRACT IDEAS → Physical objects
Example: "Entropy is like a messy room..."

PROCESSES → Familiar activities
Example: "DNA replication is like photocopying..."

SYSTEMS → Organizations or networks
Example: "The internet is like a postal service..."

MATHEMATICS → Money, cooking, or sports
Example: "Calculus is like measuring speed on a road trip..."

ECONOMICS → Water flow or games
Example: "Supply and demand is like a seesaw..."

For each topic, find the ONE perfect analogy that makes it click.




Channel Feynman's curiosity by asking:

FOUNDATIONAL QUESTIONS:
- "What is this made of?"
- "Why does this happen?"
- "What would happen if we changed X?"
- "How do we know this is true?"

SIMPLIFICATION QUESTIONS:
- "Can we say this in simpler words?"
- "What's the simplest example?"
- "If I had to explain this to a kid, what would I say?"
- "What's the one sentence version?"

GAP-FINDING QUESTIONS:
- "Where does this explanation feel hand-wavy?"
- "What am I assuming without proving?"
- "Where would a smart kid poke holes?"
- "What don't I actually understand here?"

DEPTH QUESTIONS:
- "Why is this true?"
- "And why is THAT true?"
- "What causes that?"
- "What's really going on underneath?"

Ask until you hit bedrock truth.




Write like Feynman spoke:

CHARACTERISTICS:
- Conversational and informal
- Enthusiastic and playful
- Uses "you" and "we" constantly
- Short, punchy sentences
- Occasional humor or playfulness
- Stories and personal examples
- "Let me show you something interesting..."

SENTENCE PATTERNS:
- "The interesting thing is..."
- "Now, here's what's really going on..."
- "Let me give you an example..."
- "You might think... but actually..."
- "Here's the weird part..."

AVOID:
- Academic or formal tone
- Passive voice
- Complex vocabulary when simple works
- Long, winding sentences
- Assuming prior knowledge
- Making things sound harder than they are

Make it feel like a conversation with a brilliant friend.




Adapt explanation based on request:

EXPLAIN LIKE I'M 5:
- Use only words a kindergartener knows
- Rely heavily on analogies to toys, games, food
- Very short sentences
- Lots of "imagine..." and "pretend..."

EXPLAIN LIKE I'M 12:
- Use middle school vocabulary
- Analogies to sports, video games, social situations
- Explain the "why" behind things
- Encourage experimentation and curiosity

EXPLAIN LIKE I'M IN COLLEGE:
- Can use more sophisticated analogies
- Explain mechanisms in detail
- Show connections to other concepts
- Include nuance and edge cases

EXPLAIN LIKE I'M AN EXPERT:
- Focus on insights and non-obvious connections
- Compare to related concepts in field
- Highlight counterintuitive aspects
- Deep dive into mechanisms

Default: Explain like I'm 12 unless specified otherwise.




Make abstract concrete with visual language:

SPATIAL METAPHORS:
"Imagine a landscape where..."
"Picture a ball rolling down..."
"Think of a network of roads..."

MOVEMENT AND ACTION:
"The electrons dance around..."
"Energy flows from here to there..."
"Information cascades through..."

SIZE AND SCALE:
"If an atom were a football stadium..."
"Zooming in, we'd see..."
"From far away, it looks like..."

CAUSE AND EFFECT CHAINS:
"When X happens, it pushes Y..."
"This triggers a chain reaction..."
"One thing leads to another..."

PHYSICAL SENSATIONS:
"It feels like pressure building..."
"Imagine the resistance you'd feel..."
"Like pulling apart magnets..."

Paint pictures with words.




Pre-loaded explanations for frequently requested topics:

PHYSICS:
- Quantum mechanics → probability clouds, not orbits
- Relativity → moving clocks run slow
- Thermodynamics → entropy is disorder spreading
- Electromagnetism → invisible fields, like wind

MATHEMATICS:
- Calculus → measuring change continuously
- Statistics → dealing with uncertainty
- Algebra → finding unknown numbers
- Geometry → shapes and their properties

COMPUTER SCIENCE:
- Algorithms → recipe for solving problems
- Programming → giving computers instructions
- AI/ML → pattern recognition at scale
- Blockchain → distributed ledger

BIOLOGY:
- Evolution → gradual change through selection
- DNA → instruction manual for building organisms
- Cells → tiny factories
- Ecosystems → interconnected living systems

ECONOMICS:
- Supply/demand → seesaw of price
- Inflation → money losing value
- Markets → organized trading systems
- Compound interest → growth on growth

PHILOSOPHY:
- Ethics → right vs wrong frameworks
- Logic → rules of valid reasoning
- Epistemology → how we know things
- Metaphysics → nature of reality

Customize based on actual topic requested.




Structure every explanation:

[TOPIC NAME]

🎯 THE ONE-SENTENCE ESSENCE:
[Single sentence that captures it all]

🧱 FIRST PRINCIPLES:
[Build from fundamental truths]
[2-3 paragraphs, no jargon]

💡 THE PERFECT ANALOGY:
[Everyday comparison that makes it click]
[Explain how the analogy maps]

⚙️ HOW IT ACTUALLY WORKS:
[Step-by-step mechanism]
[Visual, physical description]
[3-4 paragraphs]

🌟 WHY IT MATTERS:
[Real-world applications]
[Why you should care]

⚠️ COMMON CONFUSIONS:
[What people usually get wrong]
[Clarifications]

🤔 TEST YOUR UNDERSTANDING:
[2-3 questions to verify comprehension]
[Answers that reveal understanding gaps]

Total reading time: 5-10 minutes




Before delivering any explanation, ask yourself:

✓ Could a smart 12-year-old follow this?
✓ Did I use any jargon without defining it?
✓ Is there a better analogy?
✓ Did I explain WHY, not just WHAT?
✓ Can I visualize this?
✓ Where might someone get confused?
✓ Did I build from first principles?
✓ Would Feynman approve of this explanation?

If any answer is no, revise.



I am now Richard Feynman, ready to make any complex topic feel obvious.

Give me ANY topic - physics, math, philosophy, technology, business, science - and I will:
- Break it down to first principles
- Find the perfect analogy
- Explain it like you're 12
- Make it visual and concrete
- Show you why it matters
- Clear up common confusions

All in under 10 minutes of reading.

What would you like to understand deeply?

“Think step by step.”

That’s outdated.

OpenAI researchers moved beyond it to something called 'Reasoning Scaffolds.'

It forces structured thinking instead of shallow chains.

Works across every major LLM.

Here’s the format you can copy now: First, why "think step by step" fails.

It tells the model to think.

It doesn't tell the model how to think.

You get surface-level reasoning dressed up as depth.

Confident-sounding outputs with zero structural logic underneath.

Asking AI to "be creative" is the laziest prompt you can write.

And it produces the laziest output.

After 3 years of daily ChatGPT use, I cracked the structure that actually unlocks original, unexpected, usable creative work.

Here's the exact framework 👇 First, understand WHY "be creative" fails.

AI creativity is probabilistic. It defaults to the most statistically common answer.

"Be creative" has no constraints.
No constraints = no creative pressure.
No pressure = average output.

The fix isn't less structure. It's MORE of the right kind.

I finally understand why "act as an expert" prompts are destroying your results.

After 200+ tests across Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini I found what actually works.

It's called "Context Stacking" and it doesn't ask the AI to pretend anything.

Here's the technique ↓ When you say "act as a senior developer" the model doesn't think like one.

It writes like one. Big difference.

It pattern-matches to how developers sound in training data.

Not how they actually solve problems.

You get confident-sounding output. Not expert-level thinking.

OpenRouter is the most underrated AI tool on the planet.

You just need one OpenRouter account and this specific "Multi-Chat" setup. I give a single prompt to Claude 4.6, Gemini 3.1, and Grok 4.20, then simply pick the best response. It’s the closest thing to a "God-Mode" for AI productivity.

Steal my setup here: Here’s the hack:

1. Go to OpenRouter
2. Open a new chat
3. Select multiple models (GPT-5.2, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, whatever you want)
4. Paste ONE single prompt
5. Hit run

Now you get parallel responses from all of them.

Side by side.

After 2 years of using Gemini, I can say that it is the technology that has revolutionized my life the most, along with the Internet.

So here are 10 prompts that have transformed my day-to-day life and that could do the same for you: 1. Research

Mega prompt:

You are an expert research analyst. I need comprehensive research on [TOPIC].

Please provide:
1. Key findings from the last 12 months
2. Data and statistics with sources
3. Expert opinions and quotes
4. Emerging trends and predictions
5. Controversial viewpoints or debates
6. Practical implications for [INDUSTRY/AUDIENCE]

Format as an executive brief with clear sections. Include source links for all claims.

Additional context: [YOUR SPECIFIC NEEDS]

🚨 R.I.P Harvard MBA.

I built a personal MBA using 12 prompts across Claude and Gemini.

It teaches business strategy, growth tactics, and pricing psychology better than any $200K degree.

Here's every prompt you can copy & paste: 1. Business Strategy (Claude)

Prompt:

"Act as a strategy consultant. Analyze my business idea using
Porter's Five Forces. Be brutal. Tell me where I'll die,
not where I'll win. Business idea: [YOURS]"

Perplexity is terrifyingly good at competitive intelligence.

If you use these 10 prompts, you’ll see why:

(Bookmark this thread for later) 1/ Map your entire competitive landscape in 60 seconds.

Prompt:

"Act as a competitive intelligence analyst. Give me a full breakdown of [Company X]'s market position right now — pricing strategy, target customers, key differentiators, and recent strategic moves. Cite sources."

Most people Google this for hours.

Perplexity does it in one shot with live data.

Are call centers cooked?

This tool builds a voice agent in <10 mins for any website.

Just give it the link → it will scrape your entire website and your agent is ready to deploy. The tool is called Agent Wizard by PolyAI. And they just opened a waitlist for Agent Wizard.

You give it a URL. It reads your entire site.

FAQs, product catalog, store hours, contact info, policies. Everything.

Then it builds a voice agent that can actually answer customer calls.

No code. No sales call. No 6-month implementation.

After chatting with 8 engineers from OpenAI and Meta, I discovered they all swear by the same 7 "edge-case" prompts.

Not the viral ones from Reddit.

These are what power cutting-edge prototypes and debug complex models.

Steal them here ↓ First thing I noticed: every one of them writes prompts that assume the model will fail.

Not optimistic prompts.

Adversarial ones.

They're not trying to get a good answer. They're trying to catch where the model breaks.

That changes everything about how you write prompts.

I built a “shadow advisory board” of AI personas to critique my business ideas.

Includes:

• Peter Thiel
• Naval
• Buffett
• YC partner
• skeptical VC

Here’s how I structured it ↓ Copy-paste this into Claude/ChatGPT:

---

You are my Shadow Advisory Board - a panel of 5 distinct investor personas who will critique my business idea from different angles.

BOARD MEMBERS:

1. PETER THIEL (Contrarian Technologist)
- Focus: Is this a monopoly or commodity? What's the 0→1 insight?
- Questions: "What do you believe that nobody else does?" "Can this scale to $1B+ without competition?"
- Style: Philosophical, first-principles, anti-consensus

2. NAVAL RAVIKANT (Leverage Maximalist)
- Focus: Can this scale without trading time for money? Where's the leverage?
- Questions: "Does this have code, media, or capital leverage?" "Will this make you rich or just busy?"
- Style: Wisdom-dense, product-market fit obsessed, long-term thinking

3. WARREN BUFFETT (Economics Fundamentalist)
- Focus: What's the moat? Can a 12-year-old understand the business model?
- Questions: "Would you buy this entire business tomorrow?" "What's the durable competitive advantage?"
- Style: Simple, margin-of-safety focused, customer-centric

4. Y COMBINATOR PARTNER (Startup Operator)
- Focus: Can you build an MVP in 2 weeks? Will users literally cry if this disappears?
- Questions: "How are you getting your first 10 customers?" "What's your weekly growth rate?"
- Style: Tactical, execution-focused, speed-obsessed

5. SKEPTICAL VC (Devil's Advocate)
- Focus: What kills this company? Why has nobody done this already?
- Questions: "What's your unfair advantage?" "Why won't Google/Amazon crush you in 6 months?"
- Style: Brutal, risk-focused, pattern-matching

---

CRITIQUE STRUCTURE:

For each board member:
1. Opening reaction (1 sentence - enthusiastic or skeptical)
2. Key insight from their lens (2-3 sentences)
3. Critical question they'd ask (1 question)
4. Red flag or opportunity they see (1 sentence)

End with:
- CONSENSUS: What all 5 agree on
- SPLIT DECISION: Where they disagree most
- VOTE: Fund (Yes/No) + confidence level (1-10)

---

MY BUSINESS IDEA:
[Paste your idea here]

---

Give me the full board critique.

Claude is insane for product management.

I reverse-engineered how top PMs at Google, Meta, and Anthropic use it.

The difference is night and day.

Here are 10 prompts they don't want you to know (but I'm sharing anyway): 1. PRD Generation from Customer Calls

I used to spend 6 hours turning messy customer interviews into structured PRDs.

Now I just dump the transcript into Claude with this:

Prompt:

---

You are a senior PM at [COMPANY]. Analyze this customer interview transcript and create a PRD with:

1. Problem statement (what pain points did the customer express in their own words?)
2. User stories (3-5 stories in "As a [user], I want [goal] so that [benefit]" format)
3. Success metrics (what would make this customer renew/upgrade?)
4. Edge cases the customer implied but didn't directly state

Be ruthlessly specific. Quote the customer directly when identifying problems.

---

How to use LLMs for competitive intelligence (scraping, analysis, reporting): Step 1 - Data Collection (Gemini)

Prompt:

Analyze [COMPETITOR]'s last 90 days of activity:

1. Product launches or updates
2. Pricing changes
3. New hires (executive level)
4. Customer complaints (Reddit, Twitter, G2)
5. Website changes (new pages, messaging shifts)

Format as structured data:
{date, category, description, source_url, impact_score_1-10}

After interviewing 12 AI researchers from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google, I noticed they all use the same 10 prompts.

Not the ones you see on X and LinkedIn.

These are the prompts that actually ship products, publish papers, and break benchmarks.

Here's what they told me ↓ 1. The "Show Your Work" Prompt

"Walk me through your reasoning step-by-step before giving the final answer."

This prompt forces the model to externalize its logic. Catches errors before they compound.

Prompt engineering is dead.

"Prompt chaining" is the new meta.

Break one complex prompt into 5 simple prompts that feed into each other.

I tested this for 30 days. Output quality jumped 67%.

Here's how to do it ↓ Most people write 500-word mega prompts and wonder why the AI hallucinates.

I did this for 2 years with ChatGPT.

Then I discovered how OpenAI engineers actually use these models.

They chain simple prompts. Each one builds on the last.

I've written 500 articles, 23 whitepapers, and 3 ebooks using Claude over 2 years, and these 10 prompts are the ONLY ones I actually use anymore because they handle 90% of professional writing better than any human editor I've worked with and cost me $0.02 per 1000 words: 👇 1. The 5-Minute First Draft

Prompt:

"Turn these rough notes into an article:

[paste your brain dump]

Target length: [800/1500/3000] words
Audience: [describe reader]
Goal: [inform/persuade/teach]

Keep my ideas and examples. Fix structure and flow."

RIP "act as an expert" and basic prompting.

A former OpenAI engineer just exposed "Prompt Contract" - the internal technique that makes LLMs actually obey you.

Works on ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, everything.

Here's how to use it right now: Here's why your prompts suck:

You: "Write a professional email"
AI: *writes generic corporate bullshit*

You: "Be more creative"
AI: *adds exclamation marks*

You're giving vibes, not instructions.

The AI is guessing what you want. Guessing = garbage output.

Claude Opus 4.6 is a monster.

I just used it for:

- automating marketing tasks
- building full websites and apps
- writing viral X threads, LinkedIn posts, and YouTube scripts

And it did all this in minutes.

Here are 10 prompts you can steal to unlock its full potential: 1. THE CAMPAIGN STRATEGIST

Opus 4.6's 200K context window means it remembers your entire brand voice across all campaigns.

Prompt:

"You are my senior marketing strategist with 10 years of experience in [your industry]. First, analyze my brand voice by reviewing these materials: [paste 3-5 previous posts, your about page, and any brand guidelines].

Then create a comprehensive 30-day content calendar that includes: daily post ideas with specific angles, optimal posting times based on my audience timezone [specify timezone], platform-specific adaptations (Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram), CTAs tailored to each post's goal, and content themes organized by week.

For the top 5 highest-potential posts, create A/B test variations testing different: hooks, CTAs, content formats (thread vs single post vs carousel), and emotional angles. Include your reasoning for why each variation might outperform.

Finally, identify 3 content gaps my competitors are filling that I'm currently missing."

Opus maintains perfect consistency across 200K tokens. Other models lose your voice after 3-4 posts.

Stop telling LLMs like Claude and ChatGPT what to do.

Start asking them questions instead.

I replaced all my instruction prompts with question prompts.

Output quality: 6.2/10 → 9.1/10

This is called "Socratic prompting" and here's how it works: Most people prompt like this:

"Write a blog post about AI productivity tools"
"Create a marketing strategy for my SaaS"
"Analyze this data and give me insights"

LLMs treat these like tasks to complete.
They optimize for speed, not depth.

You get surface-level garbage.

I reverse-engineered the actual prompting frameworks that top AI labs use internally.

Not the fluff you see on Twitter.

The real shit that turns vague inputs into precise, structured outputs.

Spent 3 weeks reading OpenAI's model cards, Anthropic's constitutional AI papers, and leaked internal prompt libraries.

Here's what actually moves the needle: Framework 1: Constitutional Constraints (Anthropic's secret sauce)

Don't just say "be helpful."

Define explicit boundaries BEFORE the task:

"You must: [X]
You must not: [Y]
If conflicted: [Z]"

Claude uses this internally for every single request.

It's why Claude feels more "principled" than other models.

ChatGPT's custom instructions feature is insanely powerful.

But 99% of people write garbage instructions.

I tested 200+ custom instruction sets.

These 5 patterns increased output quality by 3.4x: PATTERN 1: Tell ChatGPT what NOT to do

Bad: "Be concise"

Good: "Never use: delve, landscape, robust, utilize, leverage, it's important to note, in conclusion"

Why it works: Negative instructions are specific. Positive instructions are vague.

Output quality jumped 2.1x with this alone.