Crémieux Profile picture
Oct 19, 2025 15 tweets 6 min read Read on X
Boobtech is amazing.

It's an area that the rest of medicine could look to as an example.

The professionals making bigger, more realistic breast implants are simultaneously improving affordability, safety, and quality at a rapid rate🧵 Image
Consider one of the most recent improvements in boobtech: the Mia.

The Mia is the first successful "injectable" breast implant.

It cuts down scarring, complications, surgery time and cost, and it looks and feels more realistic than earlier implants. Image
The Mia is installed with a small armpit incision about 2 centimeters in length.

This is a significant reduction from earlier generations, which were regularly closer to 7 centimeters, or almost 3 inches. Image
After incision, a pocket is created with a custom balloon tool designed by the creators of the Mia, Establishment Labs

This approach is done without having to put the woman under. Only local anesthetic used, which reduces surgical complication rates, exposure to anesthesia, etc. Image
Finally, with another custom tool, the implant is inserted into the pocket, pulled up, and done.

The total procedure time is 15 minutes. The total time in office averages about 90 minutes, including doctor preparation, patient briefing, and so on. Image
And you're done!

You can go back to your daily activities next day. There's a minimal recovery, and there's minimal follow-on side effects

In fact, though traditional breast implants lead to somewhere between 6-13% rupture rates and 15% contracture, the Mia's first trial saw 0!Image
The Mia includes an optional non-ferromagnetic RFID sensor that can hold patient device info for peace of mind.

The Mia isn't even the best out there!

Preservé preserves more breast tissue and the implant it's paired with gives women a fuller upper-breast (frequently desired). Image
The implant it's used with delivers fractions of the typical complication rate, for a much gentler surgery, with a much more realistic feeling, greater patient comfort, an easy recovery, and so on.

It is an amazing advance in boobtech. Image
The biomaterial it's made from also minimizes immune reactions to implantation.

This was a feat of biomedical engineering generated by exploring material options and winding up with something that really just works! Image
And there are already other boobtech improvements in the pipeline! I could go on, but won't.

I want to talk about why boobtech is so advanced.

I think it has to do with three things.

The first is the much lower regulatory burdens compared to trad pharma.
Low regulatory burden benefits make sense, so I'll explain the second thing:

A higher out-of-pocket share.

Plastic surgery is often not covered by insurers. It's aesthetic, optional, etc. Patients cannot tolerate massive cost inflation if they have to pay it, so they don't!Image
And finally, plastic surgery attracts some of the smartest doctors

The smartest doctors in a given year tend to be either dermatologists or plastic surgeons, because those disciplines tend to offer more work-life balance

They're not high-pressure, but they still reward highly Image
In fact, I think these tie into why aesthetic procedures are generally high-performing when it comes to price, innovations, etc.

Just look at how they compare to inflation in general and inflation in medicine more broadly.

They're great! Image
Aesthetic procedures are a model for how medicine ought to work

Not entirely, but at least partly

There should be room for new tech paid for by patients; room for docs to train with tech and implement rapidly all the time

There should be more room for progress and big breasts!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Crémieux

Crémieux Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @cremieuxrecueil

Feb 3
Indeed!

This research directly militates against modern blood libel.

If people knew, for example, that Black and White men earned the same amounts on average at the same IQs, they would likely be a lot less convinced by basically-false discrimination narratives blaming Whites. Image
Add in that the intelligence differences cannot be explained by discrimination—because there *is* measurement invariance—and these sorts of findings are incredibly damning for discrimination-based narratives of racial inequality.

So, said findings must be condemned, proscribed. Image
The above chart is from the NLSY '79, but it replicates in plenty of other datasets, because it is broadly true.

For example, here are three independent replications:
Read 4 tweets
Jan 29
How well-known is this?

A lot of the major pieces of civil rights legislation were passed by White elites who were upset at the violence generated by the Great Migration and the riots.

Because of his association with this violence, most people at the time came to dislike MLK. Image
It's only *after* his death, and with his public beatification that he's come to enjoy a good reputation.

This comic from 1967 is a much better summation of how the public viewed him than what people are generally taught today. Image
And yes, he was viewed better by Blacks than by Whites.

But remember, at the time, Whites were almost nine-tenths of the population.

Near his death, Whites were maybe one-quarter favorable to MLK, and most of that favorability was weak. Image
Read 5 tweets
Jan 28
The Pope, like his recent predecessors, is good to take this position: anti-Semitism is manifestly idiotic!

On that note, did you know that the Catholic Church was actually one of the biggest forces in stopping the rise of the Nazis?

It's true!🧵 Image
You might say that the Catholics didn't vote for the Nazis because they had their own party: Zentrum.

This isn't the explanation.

Note: the Catholic Church opposed both forms of totalitarianism in Germany, but it had an asymmetric effect against the Nazis, not the Communists.Image
The real "Catholic effect" on far right vote shares was small.

In reality, Catholics only became poised against the far right when the church began to actively campaign against it.

But when the local clergymen were "Brown Priests" (Nazi-supporting priests) like Alois Hudal? Image
Read 22 tweets
Jan 27
The researcher who put together these numbers was investigated and almost charged with a crime for bringing these numbers to light when she hadn't received permission.

Now we have an update that goes through 2020!

First: Where are Sweden's rapists from?

Mostly not Sweden. Image
What countries were those foreign rapists from?

We only got information on the top five origins, constituting roughly half of the foreign-born samples, and thus about a quarter of all the rapists. Image
What about welfare usage? 35.1%.
Alcoholism? 14.9%
Drug addiction? 23.7%
A diagnosed psychiatric disorder besides that? 13%

What about a criminal prior? 52%. That compares to 13.4% of non-rapist criminals. So rapes? Considerably more preventable.
Read 5 tweets
Jan 17
Greater Male Variability rarely makes for an adequate explanation of sex differences in performance.

One exception may be the number of papers published by academics.

If you remove the top 7.5% of men, there's no longer a gap! Image
The disciplines covered here were ones with relatively equal sex ratios: Education, Nursing & Caring Science, Psychology, Public Health, Sociology, and Social Work.

Because these are stats on professors, this means that if there's greater male variability, it's mostly right-tail
Despite this, the very highest-performing women actually outperformed the very highest-performing men on average, albeit slightly.

The percentiles in this image are for the combined group, so these findings coexist for composition reasons. Image
Read 6 tweets
Jan 17
One of the issues with understanding Greater Male Variability on IQ tests is that groups that perform better tend to show greater variance

Therefore, to estimate the 'correct' male-female gap, you need to estimate it when the difference is 0

In the CogAT, that looks like this: Image
In Project Talent, that looks like this: Image
And comparing siblings in the NLSY '79, that looks like this: Image
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(