Every week we generate a 1-136 ranking with our model. Basically simulating every team against every other team and ranking them by wins.
Some interesting takeaways 🧵
It thinks not only OSU is the best team, but the best team by a decent clip over #2.
Vandy in the top 10 all year. Thought we were chasing a bug in the system, but turns out Vandy is a really good team, and we probably don't think there's an issue but for looking at logos.
Much talk about B1G teams not playing ranked opponents, but if you look at modeled top 40 opponents, OSU has 5 top 40, 2 top 25 (Texas, Michigan)
Alabama has 8 top 25 in our model.
Bama's schedule strength is an outlier. OSU's schedule is better than it seems at first glance
Since the model doesn't care about who you beat or who you lost to, but rather how you performed opponent adjusted, it doesn't automatically dump a Miami or TTU for losing. Still thinks both are great teams.
Knowing TTU played a backup QB last week makes this really interesting
Oregon is being overvalued and Bama being punished because of schedule. Our model tries to adjust for competition, but when you play really poor competition or an abnormally tough schedule, you get over or under valued at the extremes.
Our model doesn't use priors and doesn't even know that Georgia is Georgia or ND is ND.
With that in mind, it's shows clear that:
- the SEC is the best and deepest conference by far
- the B1G's best teams are as good as anyone in the country
If you want to view our ranking, model any two teams against each other, or look at team statistical profiles, link is in our profile page. It's all free. Go crazy.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Everyone loves to say “Ohio State, Bama, etc” get all the calls. And you will remember one that went their way. But the reality is the best teams get absolutely screwed every year by officiating and subconscious bias
Part of this is also that B1G refs don’t throw flags at all. But that is fundamentally problematic. Penalties exist for a reason, especially holding
But for OSU it’s carried into the playoffs where their opponents aren’t getting flagged much
The top 5 teams in the SEC played these teams OOC:
- vs ACC champ 31pt win, vs Ga tech win
- vs Michigan 31-12 at Mich
- vs Wisconsin 42-10 at Wisc
- vs NC St w 51-10
- vs ACC Champ win on the road
6-0 multiple blowouts
Top 5 teams in B1G:
- vs no p5
- vs no p5
- vs WVU win
- vs no p5
- vs Kansas
Most can’t process these things and their (lack of) implications on the SEC vs Big Ten:
- Notre Dame was favored / higher-rated over Georgia
- Ohio State was favored / HR over Oregon
- Georgia would have been favored / HR over Oregon or PSU
- Tennessee (9) is still right behind Oregon (8), PSU (7)
I don’t know how many have said to us in threads that Notre Dame over Georgia was an upset. It wasn’t, in computers or Vegas, it only was in the dumb CFP rankings focused on conf champs.
The computers told us the Big Ten was top-heavy and their best could play with or beat the SEC, but the SEC was much deeper. The first was proven true, the second seems fair (lower-half SEC teams did well in bowls).
ESPN is trying to spin it positive, but that Alabama vs Michigan game was exactly why I said Penn State would beat Alabama - Jalen Milroe is just plain horrible versus teams that can afford to stay in 2- or 3-high zone because they can stop the run.
It’s hard to think of a top team in recent memory more hamstrung than Alabama was with Milroe. 2024 Michigan was but they don’t have remotely the same surrounding talent. McCord was better. Maybe some of the old Les Miles LSU teams?
I just don’t think Milroe is a quarterback. I’ve never seen any indication he can process post-snap. It’s not an intelligence thing, it’s a speed of the game thing. Michigan played drop-zone the whole game and he absolutely couldn’t see the holes in the zone.
The CFP committee is making the same mistake they made last year: signaling that who you play and how you play doesn't matter. Loss column is all that matters.
They're telling teams they should immediately cancel any meaningful out of conference games. 🧵
It was clear last year, in how they ranked Oregon and FSU until the very end, that they were hoping things "worked themselves out" so they wouldn't have to make hard, unpopular decisions, that adhered to a voting ideology of getting the best teams in.
Their rankings placate the casual fan, and are made to avoid hard media questions. They can say "Miami 1 loss, Alabama 2 losses"
And nobody asks if it's reasonable to assume a Miami team that has had multiple close calls w/bad teams goes 4-1 vs ranked teams.
Of course, nobody could have seen this type of thing coming.
The people who pushed for this to be allowed also like to talk about access and parity for the lesser teams - when in reality they've merely expedited the death warrant for half of CFB.
Because this sort of thing is what is going to push us into a new tiered system of a super league for the handful of programs who can afford this sort of thing, and another tier for everyone else.
The romantic notion of a Cincy type team being competitive in the playoffs dies.
But at least guys who were always going to be millionaires in the NFL get to be millionaires sooner.