Can we all agree that it's weird and not good that there has been a 25% rise in hospital episodes of acute myocardial infarction (heart attacks) in young working age adults?
And can we all look at that graph and maybe just consider for a moment that it might be due to damage caused by covid infections?
And, no, of course we're not catching up on the pandemic backlog of heart attacks you flipping dingdong.
There's no treatment delay.
Or reporting delay.
These are recorded on the day they happen.
🤬
And, no, it's not due to changes in healthcare practices.
If you get an acute myocardial infarction, a heart attack, you get hospital treatment straight away.
That's it.
And, no, it's not the continuation of an existing trend.
And, no, it's not due to increased awareness.
EITHER YOU HAVE AN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION OR YOU DON'T.
Sorry for shouting.
But people have been driving me nuts with their desperate excuses for the problems caused by covid infections.
The British Heart Foundation don't feel the need to lie about it:
"BHF: How does Covid-19 affect your heart?" bhf.org.uk/informationsup…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🚨If Covid infections could interfere with the way your body handles fats, you'd expect a massive jump in the number of episodes of hospital treatment for that problem.
🧵📈
What do you think the graph is going to look live?
It is so genuinely weird watching public health authorities that have *denied* that Covid is airborne for nearly six years start to say that covid is airborne.
And explain proper mitigations, like masks, hepa, ventilation.
I mean they could have said "we don't know if it's airborne" all those years, but they didn't, they said, "oh, no, it's not airborne, it's definitely not airborne".