Some thoughts on 10 year notes since Powell guided for a restart of the cutting cycle at Jackson Hole. Trying to answer what the bond market is saying
Nominal yields have fallen 33bp
Note yields are driven lower by
1)Falling real GDP expectations
2)Falling Inflation expectations 3) Falling "risk" of owning assets 4) Improving supply/demand balance vs expectations.
In attributing nominal yield changes to these 4 things unfortunately market prices don't
Easily demonstrate these things. For instance 3&4 are only able to be measured via a model which estimates risk premiums or the expected return over holding cash
Even Breakeven inflation and real TIPS yields have risk premium buried in there market yields. However we can try
TIPs yields fall due to falling real growth expectations and contracting risk premiums. They have fallen 24 of the 33 bp of Nominal yield reflecting falling growth expectations and some portion of risk premium contraction
Inflation b/e have fallen modestly totaling 9 bp of which some is inflation expectations and some is risk premium. Fair to say inflation expectations haven't moved much
One negative driver of inflation expectations (which is headline CPI ) is oil. While very short term oil has fallen meaningfully down 8% since Jackson Hole, long term oil is only down 2%. Ironically now that oil is in contango inflation expectations are supported by forward oils price increases
So oil isn't the driver.
Risk premiums are driven by expected risk and supply and demand expectations. They have modestly fallen. (This chart is 5 days lagged and the change (using my own model) is a few bp more it suggest that RP is about 11 of the 33 bp decline
Risk of holding bonds as a driver of risk premium can be proxied with measures of price volatility. There are more sophisticated ones than Move but they are telling the same story. Bond risk is basically unchanged and already low since Jackson Hole as bond risk has cratered
That leaves supply and demand shifts as the driver of risk premium declines over the past few months. Now there are tons of reasons to be worried about the debt, ongoing deficits, and geopolitical weaponization of the bond market. BUT in the short term those major concerns
haven't realistically changed. What has changed is the Fed has announced QT ending which because of the decision to continue runoff of MBS and yet NOW reinvest the proceeds in UST will reduce the supply of UST offered to the private sector in coming years.
While this was expected no later than end of Powell's term in May it's a little earlier and 60-120 bn more UST will find a home on the Fed's balance sheet. That helps a bit. Furthermore the budget deficit after tariffs is already falling by 100Bn which will allow the Treasury
modestly more flexibility on issuance. All told the supply demand conditions for bonds have modestly improved and term premiums have begun to reflect that modest improvement
What doesn't connect to me is what other markets are saying about growth and inflation. Gold expects
Debasement and inflation. Equity's reflect robust growth. But simply reading the bond market the outlook is clear
Inflation is not a problem
Growth expectations are falling
Supply and demand is improving
And bonds are low risk
Is that right? Who knows?
A lot has been said about a Fed policy mistake. They do make mistakes for sure but the bond market is not saying the Fed is making a policy mistake by cutting. No one knows if the economy is going to overheat, cool rapidly, or stagflate.
While brilliant minds predict a tipping point where U.S. debt cannot clear the market at acceptable yields, yields that the economy can tolerate, that tipping point can be soon or a decade from now.
All we can do is read what markets are saying and what the bond market is saying is clear.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
SPX has a trailing earnings yield of 4% with expected 1 year earnings growth of 11.7%. What's the bull case? For me the bull case is a combination of simply collecting the earnings accrual
and having the multiple expand slightly. In that case a 16% return would occur which is roughly 1 std higher and happens 1 out of 6 timer.
The big driver of equity returns is the accrual of earnings. Over the last 5 years earnings accrual has dominated historic returns
As long as companies continue to grow earnings they will go up over the long term.
Multiples rise and fall and as can be seen in the chart can dominate performance of equities in the short term. Furthermore multiples are impacted by interest rates
I YR return Asset bull cases part 1a
10 Year notes
10 year notes yield 4% today. What's the bull case? Let's talk about an unusually good absolute return that would happen 1 in 6 times this year meaning 1STD or more. That would be a 6% price rise Along with a 6% price move
One would also get a 4% coupon generating a 10% return and an excess return over cash of 6.5%. That's pretty good and could be leveraged 2.5x to have the same risk as SPX and generate 16.25% return.
What would that mean mechanically?
A 6% price move would require 9 year yields which are roughly 3.95% to be 3.22
A year from now.
The bull case for bonds depends on whether the odds of 3.22% yields occuring is 1:6. If the odds are higher the bonds are a buy if lower then bonds are a sell.
By far the most important one is they become insolvent
An insolvent company has negative equity. Its assets are worth less than its debt. For a bank the largest debtor is the depositor but other debtors exist as well.
Banks risk insolvency due to higher leverage of their equity relative to any other non financial company
Bank assets are also subject to sudden repricing when the loans and securities banks own default or like in the "Banking Crisis of 2023" the assets reprice rapidly due to a change in the risk free interest rate.
This chart Should not be new to anyone that has my work since 2022. @SteveMiran used and credited my work to write his paper on ATI which probably helped him get the Fed Governor Gig😅.I have presented my work to many Fed staffers and senior treasury officials many times. BUT 🧵
The Fed bears only partial responsibility to the muting of QT. QT impact is two fold reducing reserves HAS occurred. Though not much and mostly just reduced pseudo reserves in the form or RRP reduction to zero.
BUT by far the biggest impact of QT is the forcing of the private
Sector to absorb duration. As written in my DSR of 3/14/2022 before QT had even formally been announced I described how choosing runoff vs outright sales when implementing QT was handing monetary policy to the treasury. dampedspring.com/wp-content/upl…
I raised cash yesterday by selling 20% of my liquid net worth of assets holdings. I sold gold, long term bonds and stocks without view on one asset vs another. Just raised cash while keeping my asset allocation roughly constant.
I now hold 50% of my AUM in cash. Why would I do that. What makes me want less of an asset portfolio I'll refer to now as Beta and more cash.
Well my decision hinges on various factors and all are based on expectations
For centuries and certainly recently policymakers have debased their currency which makes holding assets more attractive than holding cash currency. But we all know this. So to trigger a change in one's portfolio you have to expect a different amount of debasement relative
There is a chart going around using the COT data which suggest non commercial (speculators) are historically short equity futures. Firstly yep they (whomever "they are") are short and medium large but not historic
BUT Far more importantly the Non commerical is a terrible kluge of data including leverage longs and shorts and real investors. We never ever use COT data for equities because TFF is available and purpose built. Those who use COT are dinosaurs.
TFF is moderately more useful because the cohorts are more sensible.
AIN is Unlevered long only asset managers. They are pretty long.but not as long as theyve been and I could accept the idea that they need to buy to keep up. BUt they are pretty long just not all time long
LFN is hedge funds. They use futures to hedge their stock picking books and to speculate long and short. They are biased short because they are biased long single names and need a hedge. They are medium short today. Notice they were really short in Q1 and covered on the bottom. Now they have been scaling shorts