Andrew A. Michta Profile picture
Oct 22 10 tweets 2 min read Read on X
🧵The maxim ”know your adversary” should be one of the core principles of US foreign policy. It should be the founding principle of US-Russia relations. Stop mirror-imaging and stop assuming that Russia is behaving as we would. Russia is not a part of the West—it never was. 1/10
Russia is not a nation-state; it is an empire that expanded from a tiny Duchy of Muscovy into a tsarist domain spanning eleven time zones. After 1917 Stalin continued in the same vein, pushing deep into Europe. And now Putin and his cronies are having yet another go at it. 2/10
The expectation that one can have a lasting negotiated peace deal with Russia is not borne by facts. In the Russian imperial tradition what matters is only power—both in the country’s internal governance and in foreign affair. The Leninist “kto-kogo” (who beats whom) is key. 3/10
A Russian once told me that if American analysts want to understand how Putin thinks/operates they should stop building rational choice models, and instead ask a Russian cop about what drives a street-smart thug from Leningrad as he fights to become the king of his street. 4/10
Understand how Putin’s formative KGB experience shaped him. Watch his swagger as he walks. Pay attention to how he talks, not what he says. He isn’t interested in a deal. He is the sworn enemy of everything Western civilization holds dear—determined to rebuild the RUS empire.5/10
It’s time to understand that the war in #Ukraine will end only when Putin realizes that continuing it threatens his regime’s power base at home. This is not a war over territory. It’s his war to overthrow the existing order in Europe, to bring Russia back as a great power. 6/10
Russia is not an”acute threat,” as it is described in the last US National Security Strategy; rather, it is and will remain a chronic threat as long as aggressive imperialism remains the defining policy driver of the Russian state. It’s time to recognize this grim reality. 7/10
You can’t negotiate with imperial aggression-you can only confront it, and if you want to eliminate it, you have to defeat it. This is where we are today re: Russian imperialism. It’ll not stop until it’s blocked. George Kennan understood this because he understood Russia. 8/10
So it’s time to deal with Russia as it is, not as we imagine it should be. Recognize what it stands for and what it wants to achieve. 9/10
It’s time for understanding what drives Russia. It’s time for a reality check. 10/10

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrew A. Michta

Andrew A. Michta Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @andrewmichta

Oct 18
🧵As I watched the wrangling over Germany’s demand that PL extradite the Ukrainian man accused of blowing up the Nord Stream pipeline, I asked myself whether and when the EU will live up to its professed principles. The debate should not be about what that man did/did not do. 1/5
The discussion focus on why Germany pursued the Nord Stream project in the first place. Why isn’t there real soul searching and naming names Berlin? It was Moscow’s brutal geopolitical project to isolate @NATO’s eastern flank allies while continuing to supply Germany with gas.2/5
Had the Nord Stream pipes become fully operational, Russia would have become EU’s biggest supplier of natural gas and Germany its biggest distributor. On the eve of Russia’s second invasion of Ukraine, Germany already went from some 35% dependence on Russia gas to over 50%. 3/5
Read 5 tweets
Oct 1
🧵Today I sat through a think tank discussion on China. The tenor was predictable and it could be summed up in one sentence: It's over. China is an industrial powerhouse, it has taken the lead in a number of key fields like AI, automated systems, etc. etc., and we're losing. 1/11
I didn't get a chance to object as there was a line of people asking questions, so let me try to do it this way. First, it's uncanny that we talk of China's grand strategy but rarely break it down into theater strategies in a way that factors in geographic constraints. 2/11
Most US gov't agencies, with very few exceptions, continue to live in the world of PPTs and tables, numbers and flow charts. But as with those production numbers cited for China, there is a difference between mass manufacturing and designing state of the art weapon systems. 3/11
Read 11 tweets
Sep 21
🧵I've been reflecting of late on what has been driving the polarization I see in America that, in extremis, risks national fracturing. Some conservatives see the roots in the rise of the woke ideology of left. Others see it in the 1960s revolutions, mass immigration, etc. 1/10
Liberals and the left, on the other hand, skew to arguments over the subject of race in American society as the key driver, though they reach different conclusions and approach the problem with different levels of optimism/pessimism. Some make economics its centerpiece. 2/10
Increasingly I've leaned to the view that the driver of our societal fracturing correlates with the debasement of the idea of American citizenship which now tracks mainly towards rights, with obligations nary mentioned. And the attendant fracturing of basic order in society. 3/10
Read 10 tweets
Sep 17
🧵Surveying recent commentary on the war in Ukraine or our brewing conflict with China I'm struck by the tenor of "what-about-ism" both in published commentary, social media, etc. The message is clear: the US policy community is not ready for what's brewing over the horizon. 1/5
It's worth asking why, and one possible explanation is the national fatigue after two decades of strategic meandering during GWOT. The normative bent in how we approached national security during that era ("defending the rules-based order") shunned geopolitical reasoning. 2/5
Another possible explanation is the deconstruction of American national identity, driven by postmodernist changes in our school and college curricula, mass migration and the decline of the middle class in the wake of outsourcing, with the attendant loss of self-confidence. 3/5
Read 5 tweets
Sep 16
A few years back Tom Nichols @RadioFreeTom, a friend and former fellow faculty member at @NavalWarCollege wrote a bestselling book “The Death of Expertise.” Since my return to the US I’ve been thinking about that book, and that Volume Two needs to be written. But different.1/5
The sequel to his bestselling book should be called “The Death of Basic Competence,” for what’s choking America today is the disappearance of basic skills a society needs to run itself-this from my encounters with our bureaucracy, federal, state and local to our service sector2/5
This deepening coarseness of daily interactions whenever you try to transact simple business is also about disappearing social skills, about de facto functional illiteracy that makes daily communication harder each day. And as basic competence vanishes, our world spirals. 3/5
Read 5 tweets
Sep 15
🧵Did you ever think you would live to see the day when our great Western civilization would sell out to corporate interests embedded in a 1.4 billion communist state to leverage labor arbitrage? And where elites would disregard the welfare of the country that made them rich?1/5
What are we made of? Where is the spirit of pride that made Western maritime powers dominate the seas? Why is it possible that people in our great American cities are murdered by thugs while citizens cower in fear? And why out schools produce unemployable young people? 2/5
Why is it that across the W est vulgarity has become mainstreamed, while in the US people who continue to abuse the rights the great American Constitution gave them and tell us “their rights” carry no obligation to contribute to the society that gave them that very freedom? 3/5
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(