The rape of Meya Åberg is remniscent of the murder of Iryna Zarutska. The poor girl worked at a fast food place, and was on the way home when she was attacked by a violent African. Iryna was on the way from her job in a pizzeria, while Meya Åberg worked at McDonalds.
The rape-enabling leftist policies especially hurt the lower class, hard-working women and girls. Richer women would not have to walk or take the subway home after a late shift. They would drive home from their office job in the afternoon. And then have a glass of wine with their friends and talk about the threat of "the far right".
And in both cases the perpetrator was given absurdly lenient sentences by woke, upper class, female judges.
"Violent assault rape is bad, but it's not excessively bad. So we will let the foreign rapist out in her hometown again in 2-3 years."
- Woke female judge Lena Berggren, who will never have to walk through a tunnel after a late shift at a blue-collar job.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Women's risk of being gang-raped in Europe would be reduced to just ~25% of the current level if there had been no Muslim / African mass immigration.
The Muslim / African mass immigration has made Europe less safe for women to an extreme degree.
A similar study from Sweden found that the number of assault rapes would be reduced to just 16% of the current level without the Muslim / African mass immigration.
Ask people who vote for immigration-lenient European parties why they are voting for such a policy that causes so much violent rape of women and girls. Do they not think violent rape is bad?
Trump has fired Lisa Cook from the board of the Federal Reserve.
This is great news, because Lisa Cook is an unqualified, inept diversity hire.
Her publication record is thin, and focused mostly on racial issues, not monetary policy. As economist John Cochrane noted: "[In her publication] you will find essentially nothing related to monetary policy, monetary effects on employment, interest rates, inflation, financial regulation or other traditional Fed topics."
She was clearly hired for DEI reasons, to be the first Black woman on the board.
Worse still, she is not only unqualified but an unusually inept researcher.
Her most publicized paper, published in 2014, claimed that Black patents declined in 1900 due to racial violence.
But the decline had nothing to do with that. It was simply an artifact of her own dataset.
-----
Explanation:
Cook’s dataset included 726 inventors, compiled from several sources. The single biggest source was the 1900 World’s Fair, which showcased nearly 400 African American inventors. Crucially, that record ended at 1900.
This meant her dataset was front-loaded: almost half of the data points came from a source that stopped at exactly 1900. Naturally, once that source ended, the data appeared to collapse.
Instead of recognizing that this was an artifact of her own collection, Cook attributed the decline to racial violence and lynchings.
Later, The Brookings institute looked at the number of Black patents, and identified ~50,000 patents over this same period, instead of the 726. And they found no significant decline around year 1900, proving that this was just an artifact of her data set.
-----
This embarassing blunder gave her a lot of publicity, and caused her to fail upwards, ultimately being hired for the important job in the board of the Federal Reserve.
Here is the figure from her study, showing a collapse in the number of Black patents recorded exactly at 1900, when the world's fair exhibition took place.
And here is data from the Brookings Institute, identifying 50,000 patents, showing that there was in fact no real decline in Black patents in the year 1900 (red line).
In 2013, the median German voter was in favor of somewhat less immigration
But all the political parties were in favor of more mass immigration, and that's what Germany got. Every year since 2013, Germany has had more than a million immigrants, and in 2015 more than 2 million.
This is against what the people want, and it is a failure of democracy.
AfD is the party that is closest to the median voter on the topic of immigration, and yet in the press they are denounced as extremists, and there are attempts to declare the party illegal and ban it.
From 2013, instead of less immigration as the German voters wanted, they got immigration equal to more than 20% of the population!
This is extremist. Competely changing the country like this against the will of the voters is extremist.
The price of beef here in Denmark has risen by more than 70% over the last few years, and is now at about $20 per kg.
A main reason is a large greenhouse gas tax imposed by the Danish government, that especially hits beef, due to the methane emissions from cows.
But this is a misunderstanding. Emissions from cows form a cycle where they are emitted, broken down, and absorbed again by the crops. It doesn't add up over time, and in a timeframe of decades the impact on the climate will be essentially zero. Climate is impacted by emitting things into the atmosphere that are not in an ongoing cycle, ie fossil fuels.
Furthermore the government wants to force all farmers to give the cows the experimental enzyme inhibitor Bovaer, which changes the reactions in the cows gut to emit less methane. Which again, doesn't matter for climate change.
If a company buys goods and then sells them, it wouldn’t make sense to tax it on every sale without deducting the cost of the goods it purchased. This would make the business unviable.
The same logic applies to this emission tax: it charges for the greenhouse gasses emitted, but doesn’t give credit for CO₂ absorbed (carbon reuptake). It’s like taxing sales without counting the cost of purchases. Obviously non-sensible.
.@elonmusk here explaining that "Animals are not going to make any difference to global warming. None."
This is madness. Look at how much it took for the British authorities to save this girl from the Pakistani rape gangs.
She went to the police, gave a six hour report, and provided DNA evidence. Still nothing. Just back to being raped five times a day.
Having a system that is not able to protect 12-year-old-girls from being raped is very bad.
Having mass immigration of child-rape loving Pakistanis is very bad.
And having both at the same time is even worse
Even after the perpetrators were convicted, there has been complete failure. The rapists were out again after less than four years, threatening the victims, who receive no protection.
The Guardian and others who accused people of racism for calling out the Pakistani rape gangs have semen on their hands
The report criticizes the Home Office (which claimed the majority of offenders were White), saying it was hard to understand how the Home Office reached their conclusions.