Ppl say 'I've had a bout of Covid'.
In a real bout, like boxing, fighters prepare well. Honing skills to try to defend themselves.
Most ppl do nothing to avoid Covid.
Boxing is typically 12 rounds and not infinite rounds like Covid, as each new wave swerves their defences.
1/🧵
But what people really don't get is that you sustain damage with each round.
You might not even perceive it or it might knock you down.
The damage may manifest later with people not even connecting the 'bout' they had to their worsening health or decreased cognitive ability.
2/
You see this in boxing too. Fighters can sustain damage in a fight and continue through to the end but then collapse after the fight is over or suffer brain damage years later from taking hits over a sustained career.
When boxers suffer in this way, people are never surprised.
3/
But in the same way, I am never surprised to learn that someone has suffered a stroke, heart attack, kidney damage, diabetes, memory loss, early onset dementia etc when they have had 'bouts' with Covid.
We know it's damaging blood vessels and causing inflammatory responses.
4/
We know it is compromising the immune system for some time after the bout is over too.
We know the virus can persist in tissues.
Why would it be a surprise?
The answer to that is simple; people are not informed of the truth.
They don't know the harms or long term implications.
5/
They most certainly don't seem to know that they're subjecting their children to this too on an ongoing basis.
If people knew, like boxers, they'd develop skills of damage avoidance; ducking & weaving the infection. Protecting themselves, having deep knowledge of the opponent.
6/
Boxers who learned how to be elusive and evasive with good foot movement, ringcraft and head movement have better odds.
That's what Covid informed people are like.
Through knowledge we learn to evade the virus as best possible. We get hit less often and suffer less damage.
7/
It seems people are happy to walk right onto every right hook or straight jab.
They get up (if they can) and do it all over again.
Sometimes several times a year.
Let's see how things look in 5 to 10 years from now.
I'd prefer to have less 'bouts'.
Protect yourself 😷.
8/end
@threadreaderapp please unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The fact that proper messaging about the harms of covid infection, long covid & effective ways to protect yourself has been left to members of the public to advocate for is a massive frustration to me.
People are generally unaware because of a total Public Health failure.
1/🧵
It isn't just a failure to provide the correct information; it's worse than that. It's a concerted effort to provide inaccurate info which is fed to the public through the media; the BBC for one who are entirely complicit in causing harm. Today's article is a prime example.
2/
I spoke to a contact I hadn't been in touch with for a while. It was clear that she was concerned about Covid and other infections for herself and her teenage kids. She told me one teen wears a neck gaitor over his mouth & nose and uses hand gel when travelling by train.
3/
An anecdote from me as a small business owner.
I see many more mistakes & mix ups from my clients than I've ever known.
Obvs I get more 'out of office ill' replies too but Covid affects the brain & it's noticeable imho.
Mistakes are increasing; sometimes financial ones.
1/🧵
Today for example, I had a company pay an invoice that was due to an entirely different company with that starts with the same letter. Refund issued.
Also today, another customer paid an invoice that they had already paid. Another refund issued.
2/
The burden of errors costs businesses. Not every company will be upfront about receiving mispayments but it's also taking our time up trying to reconcile accounts, having to deduce the issue, get bank details for customers and then go through the process of sending £s back.
3/
When Covid started, society largely came together.
A shared sense that we could act in a way that helped us all; especially the most vulnerable.
When Gov's realised this threat was here to stay they had 2 choices: 1) Lie 2) Be honest
Which do you think they chose?
1/
They effectively threw tear gas canisters into the crowd. They needed to break the togetherness and get people to disperse and back into their old way of life.
They knew it was airborne.
They knew it was, and remains debilitating and causes all manner of long term harms.
2/
But they needed people back at work & spending as usual. Kids back at school.
This could've been achieved by being honest but this would have required investments & unpopular mitigations.
Education & truthful messaging would've been paramount to success; yet it was possible.
3/
Badly designed studies give the wrong answers.
Here, air filters were used in *some* residents rooms; always on sleep mode.
In communal areas they were also hugely underpowered.
The level of air filtration is super-important.
Seemingly not to researchers designing studies.
1/🧵
2/ I'd expect honest reviewers to see the issues here immediately rather than report 'doesn't work'.
It's as simple as me studying whether heat can cook chicken.
I raised the chicken temp by 1 degree C.
Chicken remained raw.
Therefore heat does not work to cook chicken ❌.
2/
It's absolutely as obvious as that.
We'd then compare the untreated chicken and that where temperature was raised by 1 degree and find no significant difference.
Would anyone be at all surprised?
It's the same with air filtration; the amount matters. Like it really matters.
3/
Until the real harms from Covid infection are widely understood and accepted, pretty much nothing is likely to change.
Acknowledgement means everything else slots into place easily.
It would no longer be a fight for the obvious steps needed.
There would be a demand for them.
1/🧵
People would want to know how it's transmitted and how to avoid it.
The drive for clean air everywhere would face no push-back.
The thousands of nonsense arguments would be brushed aside.
There are still relatively few of us who know and understand the true harms.
2/
Perhaps society is too far gone and the denial is overwhelming but if everyone knew, and they knew because every Govs and public health department's disseminated this; if every healthcare worker they encounter tells them while wearing respiratory protection - it could change.
3/
I did a bit more digging about a recent BBC news article about how installing air quality monitors had a 'dramatic' effect on health.
It is an initiative by @sthelenscouncil and @WarringtonBC called the Healthy Air for Healthy Lungs project.
So what's it all about?...
1/🧵
The program targets households with kids aged 2 to 10 who have respiratory conditions.
Applicants get a home assessment of their IAQ situation.
Participants get advice on how to improve their home's air quality; guidance on cooking, cleaning, heating and ventilation practices.
2/
St Helens Council distributed 150 monitors and has a waiting list for new applications.
Shows me that when people embrace & understand the benefits of clean air, there's a demand for it.
Feedback has been extremely positive.
IAQ sensors give people info they can act upon.
3/