Thread by @hathyogi31

Behind the Curtain: Did CIA planned to eliminate PM Modi and Putin saved him?? Why PM Modi Skipped the ASEAN Summit?

Read the entire 🧵 to know 👇

In a move that has triggered global curiosity and social media storm, India’s Prime Minister announced that he would attend the ASEAN Summit virtually.

At first glance, this decision might seem like a logistical choice — but the deeper layers reveal a complex web of intelligence, geopolitics, and potential covert hostilities shaping South Asia’s strategic landscape.

This was not just any ordinary summit. It was the only occasion this year where India’s PM and President Trump were scheduled to share the same stage — a meeting that could have opened the door for a breakthrough in U.S.-India trade relations.

Yet, despite high expectations, India’s top leader chose to remain within national borders.

Why?

The answer may lie in a chain of mysterious events — events that began when the Prime Minister returned from the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) Summit months ago 👇

where he had hinted that there were serious threats to his security and even his life. Around the same time, intelligence chatter began pointing to covert destabilization attempts in India — allegedly orchestrated by powerful foreign agencies.

And just days after that hint, something shocking happened in Dhaka, Bangladesh.

The Death That Raised More Questions Than Answers

A senior U.S. military officer Terrence Arville Jackson, head of Special Operations in Asia and a veteran of over 20 years, was mysteriously found dead in a hotel in Dhaka. He wasn’t there on any official diplomatic visit. Officially, it was termed a “business trip.”

Bangladeshi authorities quickly labeled it a natural death, and no autopsy was conducted — an unusual move for an officer of such stature. Sources and independent analysts suggested otherwise: that he may have been poisoned using a rare chemical agent.

To make matters even stranger, the United States quietly suppressed the incident. No major media coverage, no congressional statement, no public inquiry. Silence.

That silence itself spoke volumes.

A Shadow Over South Asia

Around the same period, a political earthquake shook Bangladesh. Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina’s government collapsed, and suddenly Muhammad Yunus — long seen as having close ties to Washington — emerged as the head of an interim administration.

Parallel to these developments, former U.S. Ambassador Peter Haas made multiple visits to Bangladesh — six within a year — often meeting with student leaders who later played a role in anti-government movements. The pattern was too aligned to ignore.

The timing of all these events coincided with India taking a firm geopolitical stance:

▪️Standing by Russia despite Western pressure to reduce oil imports.

▪️Refusing to yield to U.S. tariff impositions on Indian goods.

▪️Strengthening ties with China and Japan through strategic dialogue.

It was during this phase that the Prime Minister’s light-hearted remark, “I just returned from China and Japan, and now I’m back safely”, caught the attention of millions. What sounded like a casual joke to the audience, to the politically aware, seemed like a coded message about something deeper — perhaps a veiled acknowledgment of the rising risks around him.

The Hidden Signals

Social media and independent analysts began connecting dots:

▪️Was there an American plan to destabilize India through regional operations in Bangladesh?
▪️Did Russian intelligence tip off India about a covert plot?
▪️Was the death of the U.S. Special Operations Commander in Dhaka linked to a counter-operation by Indian or allied intelligence?

No definitive proof exists — yet the alignment of these events cannot be dismissed as mere coincidence.

Even more telling is the Prime Minister’s reluctance to travel abroad since then. The decision to attend ASEAN virtually — despite the potential for a major U.S.-India trade dea, suggests a deliberate choice prioritizing national security over diplomacy.

America’s Uneasy Relationship with India

The United States has a long history of intervening in foreign nations under the guise of democracy and freedom — from Iran (1953) to Chile (1973), Indonesia (1965), and beyond. When regimes did not align with Washington’s strategic or economic interests, covert operations and “regime change” campaigns were set in motion.

India, however, is not a nation easily manipulated.
Unlike smaller allies, it has consistently refused to bend under Western pressure. Despite sanctions, diplomatic arm-twisting, and media propaganda — India has held its ground on buying Russian oil, standing firm on national interests, and building an independent foreign policy.

This has clearly unsettled Washington.

The rise of India as a global economic and military power poses a dual challenge:

1. It reduces America’s leverage in Asia.
2. It strengthens the emerging Russia-China-India axis that seeks to counterbalance U.S. dominance.

The Bigger Picture

Whether or not one subscribes to the “CIA conspiracy theory,” one thing is clear — the balance of global power is shifting. The U.S. no longer holds uncontested authority, and nations like India are charting independent courses that defy traditional Western control mechanisms.

For decades, America has attempted to mold narratives through global media, NGOs, and soft-power funding. But India’s internal resilience, driven by a billion-strong democracy and self-reliant economy, is proving to be an obstacle to such influence.

That explains the increasing pressure — economic, diplomatic, and possibly covert.