By 1410 the civil war raging in France caused by the infirmity of the mad King Charles led to both sides seeking help from England.
In AD 1413 Henry V was crowned king upon the death of his father and reasserted the claim to the throne of France that stemmed from his โmost famed of famous ancestorsโ Edward III.
The French manoeuvred to block Henryโs crossing of the Somme, and Henryโs smaller force of around 8,500 men was being shadowed by the much larger French force of around 15,000 while the French were still trying to recruit yet more men from nearby lords.
On the 24th of October the two forces camped near each other, and the French tried to negotiate to stall for time while they recruited more men.
Henry knew he couldnโt wait while the French army grew in size and advanced to battle on the next day!
Henry deployed his 1,500 men-at-arms in three groups in a defile between two woods with one group led by himself, another by his cousin Edward, Duke of York, and the third by Thomas Camoys.
On either side of the men-at-arms, he split his 7,000 bowmen led by Sir Thomas Erpingham. The position of the bowmen was protected sharpened stakes.
Henry would greatly benefit by the torrential rain that had soaked the muddy field of Agincourt.
After hours of inaction and re-deployment the French charged the English archers and met stiff resistance.
The French knights didnโt charge at their full strength - perhaps their haste was to try and catch the archers mid-deployment - and when they reached the archers they were kept at bay by the defensive stakes!
It is unclear exactly what damage the arrows could do to the best armed of the French knights but at the very least, their horses were wounded!
The knightsโ charge and retreat had the effect of churning up the soaking wet soil beneath them, strengthening the position of the archers even more.
Next came the main French assault through the muddy field and the French were again met with a hail of arrows.
When they finally reached the lines of English men-at-arms, they managed to push it back but were subsequently shot at point range on their flanks by the English archers!
When they ran out of arrows, the famed longbowmen of England and Wales charged the French on both flanks with hatchets, swords and daggers, and even the mallets they had used to drive their steaks into the ground!
The bowmen were lightly armoured and could more adeptly move through the churned up field of mud and blood as they assailed the heavily armoured French.
The French became increasingly hemmed in as they were attacked from the front and on both flanks.
The French at the rear pushed into the back of their comrades to reach the fighting and only added to the crush!
They were stuck! Exhausted by the fighting which was exacerbated by the weight of their arms and armour as they battle raged on!
At one point, Henryโs youngest brother Humphrey was wounded and Henry rushed in person to stand over his body with his household men, fighting off the French while his brother could be carried off the safety!
Henry came to think that the French were regrouping for another assault by their rearguard, and that the captured French, who outnumbered their captors, would join them. Henry ordered all but the most senior prisoners be killed!
With the French fought off and the prisoners cowed, the battle was over.
Around 6,000 French fighting men were killed including 100 lords and other prominent figures. Estimates of those captured are between 700-2,200.
In the aftermath of the battle the French were in disarray and the truce between the factions in their civil war broke down. Henry initially returned to England to celebrate his victory but invaded Normandy in 1417.
Thank you for reading this far.
All quotes in the thread are from Shakespeareโs Henry V.
If you enjoyed this thread and want to know what happened next, I have another which is a timeline of the entire Hundred Years War that you might like
It has been alleged that Alexios Komnenos betrayed the Crusaders and sat back while they fought his war for him.
But is that true?
To answer that we must look both at what he did and didnโt do during the First Crusade.
[Thread]๐งต
In AD 1095, the Turks had overrun most of Anatolia, Nicea had been lost, Anatolia was in chaos, and Turkic pirates were a serious threat in the Aegean.
Alexios Komnenos, having spent so many years fighting to bring stability back to the empire, had suffered a coup attempt in light of the situation in Anatolia.
He wrote to Pope Urban to request help and the Pope gave his famous speech at Clermont. This initiated what we call the First Crusade.
When the main crusade contingents arrived, most of the leaders swore an oath to Alexios to return imperial territory they captured. The details of this oath are not known and it is likely that neither sides fully understood each otherโs approach to such an oath.
โข What did Alexios do? โข
Alexios took a sizeable army to accompany the crusaders to Nicea. There they besieged Nicea and the crusaders expected to capture and plunder it. Alexios, not wanting a city that was part of the empire in the previous decade to be sacked, arranged for the city to surrender to his men.
To compensate the crusaders on the lack of plunder, he lavished them with gifts and their irritation was more or less abated.
From this point Alexios sent his armies into Western Asia Minor to clear out the Turks based around Smyrna.
John Doukas and Constantine Dalassenos were appointed to lead these campaigns while the main crusader army headed east through Anatolia on the way to Antioch and Jerusalem, accompanied by Alexiosโ deputy, Tatikios.
The impetuous young emperor Alexios Komennos rushed to battle the Normans invading the Balkans and suffered a terrible defeat at the hands of Robert Guiscard.
At the Battle of Dyrrhachion!
[Thread]๐งต
By the mid-late 11th century the Roman Empire faltered from its medieval peak and was beset on all sides by new threats; Normans in Italy, Pechenegs and Rus on the Balkans, and Seljuk Turks in the east.
The Normans had completed their conquest of southern Italy and had invaded the Balkans in May 1081.
Just a month before, the young General Alexios Komnenos had seized power from his ineffectual predecessor by marching on Constantinople.
Robert Guiscard and his Norman host besieged Dyrrhachium, which held out valiantly because Alexios had sent a garrison to reinforce the city led by George Palaiologos who is said to have fought all day after being struck in the head by an arrow.
But the Normans were rapacious and even after being struck by disease they kept up the pressure.
Meanwhile Alexios raced toward the city when he realised the Normans were unperturbed by his efforts to thwart them.
The Witan, as was tradition in England, elected Harold Godwinson as King over the young Edgar รtheling, the cousin of the late King Edward.
But the William of Normandy claimed that Edward promised him the crown and even that Harold Godwinson had sworn him allegiance.
At the same time Harald Hardrada, now king of Norway, also claimed the throne.
Harold Godwinson marched north to destroy the army of Harald before marching back down to Hastings were they were slaughtered at the battle at Hastings in October 1066. Harold, his brothers, and much of the English aristocracy died.
โข ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ โข
After the battle the Witan chose the 15 year old Edgar รtheling as king but soon abandoned him when the triumphant William marched on London and defeated the resistance at Southwark
Despite being crowned on Christmas Day 1066, the English would not yet yield to William and resistance persisted.
Harold Godwinson and the noblest men of England put up a valiant last stand against the invading army of William the Conquerer!
The Battle of Hastings heralded the end of Anglo-Saxon England, & the start of the diabolical onslaught of the Normans!
[Thread]๐งต
In 1066, King Edward the Confessor was close to death and had not arranged for the succession.
He was so ill that he could not even attend the consecration of his most important building project, Westminster Abbey
The death of Edward the Confessor in January 1066 caused a deluge of claimants to the throne of England. Chief among them was Harold Godwinson, chosen as king by the English over the last remaining aetheling, young Edgar, son of the exiled Prince Edward recently returned from Hungary.
The First Crusade was one of the most momentous events in all of history, but also one of the most controversial.
In 1096 Christian armies travelled to the Holy Land to wage war.
But was the First Crusade justified?
[Thread]๐งต
โข Setting the Scene โข
In order to understand the First Crusade we must first understand the world in which the tensions between east and west were created.
In the early 7th century, Muslim armies from Arabia began attacking the Levantine territories of the east Roman Empire. This is known today as the Islamic Conquests.
Throughout the 7th century, the Muslim armies conquered the Levant, Egypt and North Africa, and then into Gothic Spain in the early 8th century.
These maps show the approximate position of the Roman Empire in AD 600 and the result of the Islamic Conquest. (The empire also suffered some territorial losses to other peoples like the Goths and Slavs).
After suffering a series of defeats from Spain to Constantinople and even to the borders of China, the initial phase of Muslim expansion ended and most of what was Muslim territory in the Middle Ages had been conquered.
After this point, the Umayyad Caliphate collapsed and its successors contended themselves with large scale raiding, especially for slaves in Western Europe, localised border warfare, and a few relatively small territorial gains like Sicily and Crete.
It is at this point where many people stop and decide that the crusades were just a response to these early conquests and subsequent warfare, but this is only part of a much more complex picture and it is crucial to understand what happened next.
Alexander the Great defeated Darius III for the second and final time at the Battle of Gaugamela.
The victory resulted in the complete conquest of the entire Achaemenid Empire!
[Thread]๐งต
The doom of the great Achaemenid empire was fated by the rise of the mighty Philip of Macedon, who campaigned tirelessly to establish hegemony over the Greek cities and created one of the greatest armies the world has ever seen in the process.
Never has the son so perfectly matched the greatness of the father than Alexander who succeeded Philip upon his assassination by the malefactor Pausanias.
Alexander, like his father, like all Greeks, had not forgotten the Persian attempts to conquer their ancestors.
In 334, ages just 22, Alexander invaded the Persian Empire and then dealt a savage blow when he defeated Darius III and possibly the largest ancient army ever assembled at Issus.