A new important study in Frontiers in Immunology shows that repeated SARS-CoV-2 infections are beginning to display the same patterns seen in chronic viral infections - narrowing of the T-cell repertoire, exhaustion, and loss of immune flexibility (!)🧵
The immune repertoire doesn’t fully recover after infection. Diversity shrinks, and with reinfection the system no longer returns to balance.
The study analyzed T-cell receptors in people after a first infection and after reinfection with SARS-CoV-2.
The result?
Reinfection isn’t just another infection - it leaves a measurable imprint on the immune system.
T cells are the core of immune memory.
Each carries a unique receptor (TCR) that recognizes specific viral fragments.
The diversity of these receptors = the body’s ability to respond to new threats.
After infection, this diversity was significantly reduced - and didn’t recover after reinfection.
The immune system responded, but with a narrower library of T cells - less flexible, less precise.
Reinfected individuals showed higher antibody (IgG) levels,
but their T-cell repertoire was poorer and less stable.
Antibodies raise the alarm, T cells are the strike team - and that team is thinning out.
Each group showed a distinct TCR signature
primary infection - TRAV24/TRAJ42
reinfection - TRAV27/TRAJ42
healthy convalescents - TRAV35/TRAJ42
Same virus, different recognition routes - and not all lead to protection.
Healthy convalescents kept stable T-cell clones = lasting protection.
Reinfected patients lost these clones - their immune memory was rewritten and responded less effectively next time.
Loss of T-cell diversity means the body
recognizes fewer viral variants,
controls latent viruses (EBV, CMV) less well,
and is more prone to exhaustion or autoimmunity.
After one infection, recovery is possible.
But after three, four, or five covids, it may become cumulative immune wear and tear.
Each infection rewrites immune memory a bit more - reducing flexibility.
The study shows
Reinfections aren’t biologically neutral.
The T-cell repertoire can narrow permanently.
TCR diversity could serve as a biomarker of reinfection or long-COVID risk.
Zeng et al., Distinct characteristics of T-cell receptor repertoire associated with SARS-CoV-2 reinfection. Frontiers in Immunology 2025. frontiersin.org/journals/immun…
What’s most concerning is that Zeng’s team isn’t describing a one-time effect, but a shift in the overall immune architecture - a gradual change in the immune resilience of the population itself.
We’ve seen this before - and we know where it leads.
HIV and CMV = textbook examples of immune narrowing
Chronic immune stimulation leads to
reduced TCR diversity,
dominance of large T-cell clones,
loss of recognition for new antigens.
Chronic activation = silent immune fatigue
Each reinfection re-activates inflammation:
PD-1 / TIM-3 / LAG-3 signaling (T-cell exhaustion)
reduced T-cell renewal
shift toward Treg & Th2 profiles
The same shifts appear in long-term HIV, EBV.
What takes years with HIV or CMV, SARS-CoV-2 can partially induce after only a few reinfections - because it targets the same regulatory and metabolic axes of immunity.
This isn’t just about individual reinfections.
It’s about a slow, measurable erosion of immune diversity - a rewriting of the body’s defenses that affects everyone exposed often enough.
SARS-CoV-2 is quietly reshaping human immunity.
The question is whether we notice it in time.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A study from Krakow followed hospitalized COVID-19 patients for five years to see if their initial immune profiles - T, B, and NK cells - could predict who would
die in the following years, or develop long COVID.🧵
Out of 103 patients from 2020, researchers followed 80 over 54 months.
23 had died, 57 were alive - and about half of those survivors (29 people) still lived with long COVID symptoms.
That’s one of the longest immune follow-ups after COVID-19 so far.
During the acute infection, those with severe disease showed a collapse of T and NK cells.
Their total T cells dropped to a median of 340 per µl (vs 705 in milder cases).
CD4+ helper T cells fell to 183 vs 452, and CD8+ cytotoxic T cells to 109 vs 227.
Even NK cells were lower (107 vs 157).
Meanwhile, the proportion of B cells was paradoxically higher - 18.5% vs 12.5%.
A new preprint from Aarhus University shows something striking:
people with post-COVID, MCS, and functional disorders all share the same brain pattern -
split hemispheres, weakened bridges between left and right (!),
overloaded smell and sensory circuits🧵
The study scanned 57 women (post-COVID, MCS, FSD, controls) using diffusion MRI (DTI).
It didn’t measure brain activity, but rather its wiring - the white-matter highways that carry information between regions.
Result.
Interhemispheric connectivity - the bridge between left and right hemispheres - was reduced by 70% in all three patient groups.
That means information flow across the brain is slower, less coordinated, and less efficient.
A new study strengthens the view that SARS-CoV-2:
disrupts brain homeostasis,
alters ionic & neurotransmitter balance,
and triggers lasting epigenetic reprogramming.
Researchers exposed human primary astrocytes to Delta and Omicron.
The results are striking🧵
Astrocytes were infected with Delta and Omicron at a very low viral load (MOI 0.2).
After just 6 hours, RNA-seq revealed major transcriptional shifts
Omicron deregulated 346 genes (197 ↑, 149 ↓)
Delta deregulated 341 (215 ↑, 126 ↓)
About half of the changes overlapped.
Even minimal exposure triggered broad molecular changes within hours.
Viral sensing and immune response.
Astrocytes primarily activated TLR2, but not RIG-I or NLRP3 - meaning they sensed the virus without launching a full antiviral storm.
Only 16 genes involved in interferon and interleukin signaling were affected.
Even though Omicron often causes milder illness, it leaves a clear metabolic footprint disrupting liver, immune, and energy metabolism.
A new study shows that even 2-4 weeks after recovery, the body does not return to normal metabolic state🧵
Researchers analyzed blood serum from 300 Omicron patients, 200 recovered, and 380 healthy controls.
Using LC-MS metabolomics, they tracked hundreds of molecules revealing how the infection affects the liver, mitochondria, and immune system.
Over 100 metabolites were significantly altered during infection - that’s expected in any acute illness.
What’s not expected?
Most of these changes did not return to normal even after clinical recovery.
For the first time ever, a human body was instructed to make lab-designed antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 - by itself - from synthetic DNA.
One shot.
No virus.
Protection lasting over a year.🧵
A new Nature Medicine study tested something called DNA-encoded monoclonal antibodies (DMAbs).
Instead of injecting ready made antibodies, scientists injected synthetic DNA that tells your cells how to make them.
Your muscle becomes a mini factory for antibodies.
The DNA carried blueprints for tixagevimab and cilgavimab - the antibodies used in Evusheld.
It was delivered intramuscularly, with short electric pulses (electroporation) that help DNA enter cells.
SARS-CoV-2 is not just a respiratory virus. It acts more like an epigenetic manipulator - a virus that rewires how our genes are read and expressed. A new study shows how the virus edits the body’s epigenetic code🧵
Instead of simply damaging cells, it reprograms the host’s immune system, changing the molecular instructions that guide how the body responds to infection.
This is why COVID-19 can leave such a deep biological footprint. The virus doesn’t have to remain active to keep affecting you - it can alter the settings of your immune and metabolic genes in ways that persist long after recovery.