Thread by @mitter81

The question I would like to know is how come in 2023 the so called vaccines were given marketing approval?
Even today AI is giving a narrative answer of safe and effective despite what is being seen in reality, and contradicts itself when questioned on that.

https://twitter.com/mitter81/status/1416486187951394822

Governments & regulatory bodies that granted emergency marketing approval for COVID-19 vaccines haven't been held accountable for damages, primarily due to legal frameworks designed to shield both manufacturers and regulators during public health emergencies. This is a big issue.

Another issue I encountered when questioning the AI, is I got as far as it answering "The available data focuses on the safety of the vaccines for the individuals receiving them not on the health outcomes of their offspring" in regards to what is being seen within some cohorts...

when my VPN was attacked & I couldn't ask it further questions, my entire NS lookup was misdirected amongst other things on restart, I asked a question relating fertility has it been impacted? we know it has via various analytics yet AI says differently.

This is a major issue.

Like grok and other AI's, this one I was interrogating being called LEO, it gives major narrative responses until you start narrowing down specific questions to its response, at some point I triggered something to attack my public IP.

We the public are being slowly herded into a digital dystopia, we need a digital bill of rights and to thwart and kill the progression of singular digital identity frameworks.

These and AI reliance pose a great threat to us in multiple ways. I've written other threads and will also break this out. The internet is of great benefit, but not when it's being selectively abusive via automated censorship practices to quell dissenting questions.

@threadreaderapp unroll