I have question… why would anyone for any good reason even put a limit on how far back you look into grooming gang cases?
Why not twenty or thirty years to be absolutely sure regardless and to be thorough?
My first thought is someone wants something covered up that happened over fifteen years ago.
My first thought is someone wants something covered up that happened over fifteen years ago.
Tony Blair left office as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom over 18 years ago
And right here is exactly why we look back further.
On his watch.
It only looks like Labour are trying not to take any blame.
Sometimes the blatantly obvious is just that.
Good question…. I’m not sure if Epstein falls under the grooming gang category I will have to look into it.
Recent news reports have confirmed that former Prime Minister Tony Blair met with Jeffrey Epstein in Downing Street in 2002, six years before Epstein was convicted of soliciting prostitution from a minor.
Roughly 22 years ago.
Just saying.
It states here:
Yes, Jeffrey Epstein engaged in extensive grooming
Yes, Jeffrey Epstein engaged in extensive grooming
If it looks like a duck and it quacks like a duck, it’s a duck.
Someone explain to me why you would use qubits that cross and disrupt the blood brain barrier as actioning potentials relating to optogenetic mind control for to combat a virus?
It makes no sense at all unless…
The virus was qubits as well get it.
Yeah it just clicked alright.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
