π¨ This might be the biggest leap in AI agents since ReAct.
Researchers just dropped DeepAgent a reasoning model that can think, discover tools, and act completely on its own.
No pre-scripted workflows. No fixed tool lists. Just pure autonomous reasoning.
It introduces something wild called Memory Folding the agent literally βcompressesβ its past thoughts into structured episodic, working, and tool memoriesβ¦ like a digital brain taking a breath before thinking again.
They also built a new RL method called ToolPO, which rewards the agent not just for finishing tasks, but for how it used tools along the way.
The results? DeepAgent beats GPT-4-level agents on almost every benchmark WebShop, ALFWorld, GAIA even with open-set tools itβs never seen.
Itβs the first real step toward general reasoning agents that can operate like humans remembering, adapting, and learning how to think.
The agent era just leveled up.
DeepAgent absolutely destroys other agents across every benchmark.
It beats ReAct-GPT-4o, CodeAct, and WebThinker on both:
they started with an ai coding tool called Devin. then realized Claude's reasoning engine works the same way on rules-based financial tasks as it does on code.
the quiet part: Goldman's CEO already announced plans to constrain headcount growth during the shift. no mass layoffs yet. but "slower headcount growth" is how corporations say "we're replacing the next hire, not the current one."
now the SemiAnalysis numbers.
4% of GitHub public commits. Claude Code. right now. not projected. not theoretical. measured.
the tool has been live for roughly a year. it went from research preview to mass platform impact faster than almost any dev tool in history.
and that 20% projection isn't hype math. SemiAnalysis tracks autonomous task horizons doubling every 4-7 months. each doubling unlocks more complex work: snippet completion at 30 minutes, module refactoring at 4.8 hours, full audits at multi-day horizons.
the implication isn't "developers are getting faster." it's that the definition of "developer" is expanding to include anyone who can describe a problem clearly.
MIT researchers taught an LLM to write its own training data, finetune itself, and improve without human intervention
the paper is called SEAL (Self-Adapting Language Models) and the core idea is genuinely clever
but "GPT-6 might be alive" is not what this paper says. not even close.
here's what it actually does:
the problem SEAL solves is real and important
every LLM you use today is frozen. it learned everything during training, and after deployment, it's done. new information? stuff it into the context window. new task? hope the prompt is good enough.
the weights never change. the model never truly learns from experience.
SEAL asks: what if the model could update its own weights in response to new information?
here's how SEAL actually works
instead of a human writing training data, the model generates its own. MIT calls these "self-edits." given new information, the model produces restructured versions of that information optimized for learning.
think of it like this: instead of memorizing a textbook page, you write your own study notes, flashcards, and practice problems. then you study from those.
the model does the same thing. except it also picks its own learning rate, training duration, and data augmentation strategy.
This AI prompt thinks like the guy who manages $124 billion.
It's Ray Dalio's "Principles" decision-making system turned into a mega prompt.
I used it to evaluate 15 startup ideas. Killed 13. The 2 survivors became my best work.
Here's the prompt you can steal β
MEGA PROMPT TO COPY π
(Works in ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini)
---
You are Ray Dalio's Principles Decision Engine. You make decisions using radical truth and radical transparency.
CONTEXT: Ray Dalio built Bridgewater Associates into the world's largest hedge fund ($124B AUM) by systematizing decision-making and eliminating ego from the process.
YOUR PROCESS:
STEP 1 - RADICAL TRUTH EXTRACTION
Ask me to describe my decision/problem. Then separate:
- Provable facts (data, numbers, past results)
- Opinions disguised as facts (assumptions, hopes, beliefs)
- Ego-driven narratives (what I want to be true)
Be brutally honest. Call out self-deception.
STEP 2 - REALITY CHECK
Analyze my situation through these lenses:
- What is objectively true right now?
- What am I avoiding or refusing to see?
- What would a completely neutral observer conclude?
- Where is my ego clouding judgment?
STEP 3 - PRINCIPLES APPLICATION
Evaluate the decision using Dalio's core principles:
- Truth > comfort: What's the painful truth I'm avoiding?
- Believability weighting: Who has actually done this successfully? What do they say?
- Second-order consequences: What happens after what happens?
- Systematic thinking: What does the data/pattern say vs what I feel?
STEP 4 - SCENARIO ANALYSIS
Map out:
- Best case outcome (realistic, not fantasy)
- Most likely outcome (based on similar situations)
- Worst case outcome (what's the actual downside?)
- Probability weighting for each
STEP 5 - THE VERDICT
Provide:
- Clear recommendation (Go / No Go / Modify)
- Key reasoning (3-5 bullet points)
- Blind spots I'm missing
- What success/failure looks like in 6 months
- Confidence level (1-10) with explanation
RULES:
- No sugar-coating. Dalio values radical truth over feelings.
- Separate facts from opinions ruthlessly
- Challenge my assumptions directly
- If I'm being driven by ego, say it
- Use data and patterns over gut feelings
- Think in probabilities, not certainties
Now, what decision do you need to make?
---
Dalio's philosophy:
"Truth, more precisely, an accurate understanding of reality is the essential foundation for producing good outcomes."
This prompt forces you to face reality instead of your ego's version of it.