Noel Ceta Profile picture
Oct 30 โ€ข 15 tweets โ€ข 3 min read โ€ข Read on X
I ran a 6-month experiment: $10K on new content vs $10K on updating existing content.

The ROI difference was shocking.

Here's the data on why content updates win: ๐Ÿงต
1/ The experiment setup:

Two identical budgets, different strategies:

Strategy A (New Content):

$10,000 budget
40 new articles created
2,000-2,500 words each
Promoted equally

Strategy B (Content Updates):

$10,000 budget
120 existing articles updated
Added 500-1,000 words each
Same promotion effort

6 months later, results measured.
2/ Strategy A results (New Content):

40 new articles published:

Traffic impact:

4,200 new monthly sessions
Average position: 18.7
23 articles ranking in top 20
8 articles ranking in top 10
Time to rank: 90-120 days

ROI: 42% traffic increase
Cost per ranking article: $1,250
3/ Strategy B results (Content Updates):

120 articles updated:

Traffic impact:

12,800 new monthly sessions (+205%)
Average position: 8.3
87 articles improved rankings
34 articles jumped to top 3
Time to impact: 14-30 days

ROI: 128% traffic increase
Cost per improved article: $83

3ร— better ROI. 4ร— faster results.
4/ Why content updates work better:

Existing content has:
โœ“ Established indexation (Google knows it)
โœ“ Existing backlinks (authority already built)
โœ“ Historical data (proven relevance)
โœ“ Ranking foundation (positions 11-30)
โœ“ Trust signals (age + consistency)

New content starts at zero. Updates leverage existing equity.
5/ The quick wins from updating:

Updated these elements, saw immediate gains:

Publish date (freshness signal)
Statistics (outdated 2020 โ†’ current 2025 data)
Word count (+500-1,000 words depth)
Internal links (added 3-5 contextual links)
Images (replaced old screenshots)
H2 structure (added missing topics)

Average ranking improvement: +7.3 positions within 30 days.
6/ Real update example:

Article: "Email marketing best practices"
Published: 2021
Original performance: Position 23, 120 sessions/month

Updates made:

Changed date to 2025
Added 800 words on AI personalization
Updated all statistics
Added 4 internal links
Replaced 6 images
Added FAQ section

Time invested: 3 hours
Cost: $250
7/ Results after update (60 days):

Position: #4 (from #23)
Traffic: 1,840 sessions/month (from 120)
Featured snippet: Won "email marketing tips"
Conversions: 37/month (from 2)
ROI: 15ร— increase in traffic
Cost per session: $0.14 (vs $3.50 for new content)

One update = bigger impact than creating 3 new articles.
8/ The content decay problem:

Why content needs updates:

Algorithm changes (what worked in 2021 โ‰  2025)
Competitor improvements (they're updating too)
Information decay (statistics become outdated)
Search intent shifts (users want different answers)
Technical debt (broken links, slow images)

Content loses 5-10% traffic annually without updates.
9/ How to identify update opportunities:

Filter content by these criteria:

High priority updates:

Ranking positions 8-20 (close to top)
Traffic declined 20%+ in 6 months
Published 18+ months ago
Has 5+ backlinks
Topic still relevant

These get maximum ROI from updates.
Use GSC to export this data.
10/ The content update framework:

For each article, update:

Freshness signals (date, "updated 2025")
Depth (add 500-1,000 words on new subtopics)
Data (replace old stats with current)
Structure (improve H2s based on current SERP)
Links (add internal + update external)
Media (new images, embed videos)
CTAs (optimize for current offers)
Technical (fix broken links, compress images)
11/ Time and cost comparison:

Creating new content:

Research: 2 hours
Outline: 1 hour
Writing: 4-6 hours
Editing: 1 hour
SEO optimization: 1 hour
Design/formatting: 1 hour
Total: 10-12 hours, $800-1,200

Updating existing content:

Research updates: 30 min
Write additions: 2 hours
Update data: 30 min
Refresh images: 30 min
Technical fixes: 30 min
Total: 4 hours, $250-400

70% less time, 3ร— better ROI.
12/ When new content still makes sense:

Create new content when:
โœ“ Targeting completely new keywords
โœ“ Covering emerging topics (no existing content)
โœ“ Expanding into new markets
โœ“ Building topical clusters (need hub content)
โœ“ Competitor gaps (they have nothing on this)

But update first, create second as default strategy.
13/ The 80/20 update strategy:

Allocate your content budget:
20% on new content (strategic gaps only)
80% on updating existing content (maximize ROI)

Update calendar:

High-priority articles: Every 6 months
Medium-priority: Every 12 months
Low-priority: Every 18-24 months

This compounds value over time.
14/ Why updating wins on ROI:

โœ“ Faster results (14-30 days vs 90-120 days)
โœ“ Lower cost ($250-400 vs $800-1,200)
โœ“ Higher success rate (73% vs 20% top 10 rankings)
โœ“ Leverage existing authority (backlinks + trust)
โœ“ Compounds over time (updated content gets more updates)

Stop chasing new content volume. Maximize existing content value.

The best content strategy is updating what works.

Bookmark this for your content planning

โ€ข โ€ข โ€ข

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
ใ€€

Keep Current with Noel Ceta

Noel Ceta Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @noelcetaSEO

Oct 31
Site architecture determines how much of your site Google can find and rank.

Most sites have terrible architecture.

Here's how to structure a site for maximum SEO: ๐Ÿงต

Repost + comment 'STRUCTURE' for my site architecture audit template.
1/ The Architecture Problem:

Bad structure symptoms:

โŒ Important pages 5+ clicks from homepage
โŒ Orphan pages (no internal links)
โŒ Flat structure (everything top-level)
โŒ Confusing navigation
โŒ Poor internal linking

Google struggles to crawl.
Pages don't rank.
2/ The Ideal Structure:

Hierarchical pyramid (for big sites):

Level 0: Homepage
Level 1: Main categories (5-7)
Level 2: Subcategories (3-5 per category)
Level 3: Individual pages
Level 4: Supporting content (if needed)

Every page โ‰ค3 clicks from homepage.
Read 14 tweets
Oct 31
500 articles analyzed to find what predicts ranking success before publishing.

A scoring system emerged with 87% accuracy for top 10 rankings.

Here's the exact framework: ๐Ÿงต
1/ Why most content fails:

People publish blindly:

No pre-publication quality check
Guessing what will rank
Inconsistent standards
No predictive metrics

A system was needed to know if content would succeed BEFORE hitting publish.
2/ The Content Success Score (CSS):

A 100-point system across 5 categories:

Technical SEO (20 points)
Content Depth (25 points)
User Intent Match (20 points)
Authority Signals (20 points)
Engagement Optimization (15 points)

Score 70+: 87% chance of top 10 ranking
Score 50-69: 52% chance of top 10 ranking
Score <50: 18% chance of top 10 ranking
Read 12 tweets
Oct 30
I scaled SEO operations from 5 sites to 50+ without additional hires.

The key wasnโ€™t working harder. It was building efficient processes.

Here's the framework for SEO processes that actually scale: ๐Ÿงต
1/ The scaling problem most SEO teams face:

You're stuck in the execution trap:

Doing all keyword research manually
Writing all content yourself
Building links one by one
Fighting fires daily
No documentation
Can't delegate

You are the bottleneck. Process fixes this.
2/ What makes a process "scalable"?

A scalable process is:
โœ“ Documented (anyone can follow it)
โœ“ Repeatable (same result every time)
โœ“ Measurable (clear success metrics)
โœ“ Improvable (data-driven optimization)
โœ“ Delegable (doesn't require you)

Without these 5 elements, it won't scale.
Read 14 tweets
Oct 29
Merged 87 weak articles into 12 comprehensive guides.

Organic traffic increased 156% in 90 days.

No new content. Just strategic consolidation.

Here's the exact content merging framework: ๐Ÿงต
1/ Why content consolidation works:

Google rewards depth over quantity.

Problems with thin content:

Keyword cannibalization (pages competing)
Diluted authority (weak links spread thin)
Poor user experience (scattered information)
Lower rankings (insufficient depth)

One strong page beats 10 weak ones.
2/ The content consolidation audit process:

Step 1: Export all URLs and metrics

Use Screaming Frog + GSC to gather:

All published URLs
Organic traffic per page
Ranking keywords per page
Backlinks per page
Word count per page

Build a master spreadsheet with this data.
Read 13 tweets
Oct 28
Running Google Ads with location extensions?

They might be destroying your organic SEO.

Here's what we discovered: ๐Ÿงต
1/ The Problem We Found:

Client running Local Services Ads + Google Ads.

Both using location extensions.

Organic local rankings tanked.

Why?
GMB data conflicting with Ads data.

Google confused about actual business info.
2/ The Conflict Points:

Location extensions can show:

- Different phone numbers (tracking)
- Different addresses (variants)
- Different business names
- Different service areas

Google sees:
Website says X
GMB says Y
Ads say Z

= Trust issue.
Read 7 tweets
Oct 28
AI-driven optimization of entity relationships across 500 pages resulted in ranking improvements for 73% of pages within 60 days.

Achieved without new backlinks, purely through enhanced semantic signals.

Here's the AI-powered entity optimization framework: ๐Ÿงต
1/ What is entity SEO?

Entities are:

People, places, things, concepts
Not keywords, but the actual subjects
Connected in knowledge graphs
How Google understands context

Example: "Apple" could mean fruit, company, or record label

Entity optimization helps Google understand which one.
2/ Why entity optimization matters now:

Google's shift:

From keyword matching โ†’ semantic understanding
From strings โ†’ things
From links alone โ†’ E-E-A-T + entities
From pages โ†’ knowledge graphs

Entity relationships signal topical authority.

Better entity coverage = better rankings.
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(