New content starts at zero. Updates leverage existing equity.
5/ The quick wins from updating:
Updated these elements, saw immediate gains:
Publish date (freshness signal)
Statistics (outdated 2020 → current 2025 data)
Word count (+500-1,000 words depth)
Internal links (added 3-5 contextual links)
Images (replaced old screenshots)
H2 structure (added missing topics)
Average ranking improvement: +7.3 positions within 30 days.
6/ Real update example:
Article: "Email marketing best practices"
Published: 2021
Original performance: Position 23, 120 sessions/month
Updates made:
Changed date to 2025
Added 800 words on AI personalization
Updated all statistics
Added 4 internal links
Replaced 6 images
Added FAQ section
Time invested: 3 hours
Cost: $250
7/ Results after update (60 days):
Position: #4 (from #23)
Traffic: 1,840 sessions/month (from 120)
Featured snippet: Won "email marketing tips"
Conversions: 37/month (from 2)
ROI: 15× increase in traffic
Cost per session: $0.14 (vs $3.50 for new content)
One update = bigger impact than creating 3 new articles.
8/ The content decay problem:
Why content needs updates:
Algorithm changes (what worked in 2021 ≠ 2025)
Competitor improvements (they're updating too)
Information decay (statistics become outdated)
Search intent shifts (users want different answers)
Technical debt (broken links, slow images)
Content loses 5-10% traffic annually without updates.
9/ How to identify update opportunities:
Filter content by these criteria:
High priority updates:
Ranking positions 8-20 (close to top)
Traffic declined 20%+ in 6 months
Published 18+ months ago
Has 5+ backlinks
Topic still relevant
These get maximum ROI from updates.
Use GSC to export this data.
10/ The content update framework:
For each article, update:
Freshness signals (date, "updated 2025")
Depth (add 500-1,000 words on new subtopics)
Data (replace old stats with current)
Structure (improve H2s based on current SERP)
Links (add internal + update external)
Media (new images, embed videos)
CTAs (optimize for current offers)
Technical (fix broken links, compress images)
Research updates: 30 min
Write additions: 2 hours
Update data: 30 min
Refresh images: 30 min
Technical fixes: 30 min
Total: 4 hours, $250-400
70% less time, 3× better ROI.
12/ When new content still makes sense:
Create new content when:
✓ Targeting completely new keywords
✓ Covering emerging topics (no existing content)
✓ Expanding into new markets
✓ Building topical clusters (need hub content)
✓ Competitor gaps (they have nothing on this)
But update first, create second as default strategy.
13/ The 80/20 update strategy:
Allocate your content budget:
20% on new content (strategic gaps only)
80% on updating existing content (maximize ROI)
Update calendar:
High-priority articles: Every 6 months
Medium-priority: Every 12 months
Low-priority: Every 18-24 months
This compounds value over time.
14/ Why updating wins on ROI:
✓ Faster results (14-30 days vs 90-120 days)
✓ Lower cost ($250-400 vs $800-1,200)
✓ Higher success rate (73% vs 20% top 10 rankings)
✓ Leverage existing authority (backlinks + trust)
✓ Compounds over time (updated content gets more updates)
Stop chasing new content volume. Maximize existing content value.
The best content strategy is updating what works.
Bookmark this for your content planning
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I scaled SEO operations from 5 sites to 50+ without additional hires.
The key wasn’t working harder. It was building efficient processes.
Here's the framework for SEO processes that actually scale: 🧵
1/ The scaling problem most SEO teams face:
You're stuck in the execution trap:
Doing all keyword research manually
Writing all content yourself
Building links one by one
Fighting fires daily
No documentation
Can't delegate
You are the bottleneck. Process fixes this.
2/ What makes a process "scalable"?
A scalable process is:
✓ Documented (anyone can follow it)
✓ Repeatable (same result every time)
✓ Measurable (clear success metrics)
✓ Improvable (data-driven optimization)
✓ Delegable (doesn't require you)
Built and managed 40+ strategic SEO partnerships over 7 years.
12 generated over $300K in combined value, while 28 were discontinued after evaluation.
Here's the framework for partnerships that actually drive results: 🧵
1/ What is an SEO Partnership?
Not just link exchanges.
Real partnerships are:
Content collaborations
Co-marketing initiatives
Tool/data integrations
Joint research projects
Guest expert programs
Cross-promotion agreements
Mutual value creation, not one-sided asks.
2/ Why Most SEO Partnerships Fail:
Common reasons:
Misaligned incentives (one side benefits more)
No clear agreement (vague expectations)
Imbalanced effort (one partner does all the work)
Poor communication (assumptions vs clarity)
No measurement (can't prove value)
20-40% traffic drop is normal.
Takes 6-12 months to recover.
But I've done 3 domain migrations that GAINED traffic.
Last one: +47% traffic within 8 weeks.
It's rare. But possible.
Here's exactly how we did it: 🧵👇
1/ Why this migration was different
Old domain issues:
- Penalized in 2019 (recovered but never fully)
- Strange domain name (unrelated to business)
- No brand recognition
- Weird backlink profile
New domain:
- Exact match domain (keyword-rich)
- .com (vs old .net)
- Brandable name
- Fresh start
Sometimes a clean slate > damaged history.
2/ The pre-migration preparation (critical)
2 months before migration:
□ Built new site on new domain (not live)
□ Improved all content (30% more comprehensive)
□ Optimized all technical SEO
□ Better site structure
□ Faster hosting
□ Better UX/design
Key insight:
Don't just migrate. Migrate AND improve.
We didn't move a broken site.
We moved to a better site.