The Labor Channel Is Not a Causal Driver of Inflation: VAR Evidence from the United States
Thus, inflation and wages are not driven by labor conditions; they respond to the credit cycle and the associated demand and price dynamics. The NK causal chain is reversed.
Contribution
2. The Canonical New-Keynesian Model
2.3 Dynamic IS (Euler) Equation
Central Role of Labor in the NK System
Two core empirical claims are embedded:
3. Data, Empirical Strategy, and Identification
Why Services Inflation?
Baseline Empirical Approach
3.4 Identification Strategy
Hypotheses Tested
Estimation Tools
4. Empirical Results
Across all methods, the findings point to a unified conclusion: the labor channel does not causally drive wages or inflation.
4.2 Lead–Lag Correlations
4.3 Granger Causality Tests
Neither unemployment nor V/U predicts wages or inflation.
4.4 VAR Results
The causal chain runs from credit and demand conditions to prices and then to labor, not from labor to prices.
4.5 Local Projections
The labor channel is not dormant — it is absent.
4.8 Summary Causal Diagram
Empirical Verdict:
The NK chain is inverted and interrupted.
Slack neither drives wages nor prices.
Instead, slack follows price adjustments driven by credit and demand.
Inflation and wages are downstream of credit and demand, not labor-market slack.
The canonical NK transmission mechanism fails both theoretically and empirically.
5. Interpretation: Balance-Sheet Transmission and Policy Implications
Labor-market outcomes are responses, not initiators.
5.2 Why the NK Labor Mechanism Fails
5.3 Why Phillips-Curve Correlations Sometimes Look Valid
5.4 Policy Consequences
The labor market responds to inflationary cycles, not vice-versa
5.6 Avoiding Policy Error
5.8 A Model for the Modern Economy
Place labor market outcomes at the end of the chain, not the beginning
6. Conclusion
Using quarterly U.S. data from 1988–2024 and a comprehensive suite of empirical methods, we find no evidence supporting this mechanism. Instead, the data consistently show that credit expansion drives demand, services inflation responds first, and labor-market tightening and wage growth follow with lags.
A. Data Appendix
B. Econometric Appendix
C. Robustness
Table 1. Descriptive Statistics (1988Q1–2024Q2)
Table 2. Granger Causality Results
Table 3. VAR Significance Summary
Table 4. Local Projection (LP) Significance by Horizon
@ojblanchard1 @FrancoisGeerolf The canonical New-Keynesian three-equation model (NK Phillips–Euler–Taylor system) is not empirically salvageable because its core causal mechanism — slack-induced inflation — is reversed in the data.
@ojblanchard1 @FrancoisGeerolf Reversal of the New-Keynesian Inflation Mechanism: Evidence from Credit, Services Inflation, and Labor-Market Tightness
The Fed Tightened Into an Energy Shock: A Policy Error Explanation of the Global Financial Crisis
This interpretation challenges the standard NK narrative that the GFC was the result of exogenous financial frictions or regulatory failure alone (Bernanke, Gertler & Gilchrist 1999). Instead, it suggests that monetary policy itself was a causal amplifier of crisis dynamics.
....by tightening into a negative real-income shock, the Fed mechanically reduced household liquidity, which led to rising delinquency and default rates—first in adjustable-rate subprime mortgages and later system-wide as refinancing options collapsed (Gorton 2008).
...By relying on CPI-based inflation signals that masked energy cost dynamics and by ignoring balance-sheet fragility, the Fed tightened into a supply shock—an error similar in structure to the policy tightening that deepened the recessions following the oil shocks of the 1970s (Hamilton 1983; Blanchard & Galí 2007).
Appendix C. Triangulation and Hierarchy of Evidence: Debt, Assets, and the Monetary Function of the Balance Sheet
"Across all tests, posterior belief that financial assets perform the monetary function exceeds 99.5 %, satisfying the “decisive evidence” threshold."
The Three Axes of Empirical Proof
This establishes the creation mechanism of effective money.
Nominal purchasing power arises not from central-bank base money but from private and public credit issuance.
Balance-Sheet Structure (Ω): Assets as Money’s Internal Equivalent
Assets Are Effective Money: Empirical and Theoretical Evidence from Balance-Sheet Dynamics
This paper argues and demonstrates empirically that financial assets are effective money: their expansion drives aggregate demand, profits, and inflation with measurable lags and with statistical precision that far exceeds the explanatory capacity of conventional monetary aggregates (M1, M2, or base money).