The biggest changes in my life have been the complete collapse of popular literacy (it used to be cool to actually read books, hard to believe now) & the emergence of a totalizing cultural japanophilia. Growing up they said “put down the gamebox pokemans and read your harry potter”
In a sense, popular literacy only exists now in the millennial-YA-to-erotica pipeline & in manga readers (most of which is erotica). That whole world I grew up in of David Foster Wallace being presented as a rock star, which provided this sense that such a fate was even possible, gone
The appeal of the “alt right literary space” in the year 2015 was the notion that this would somehow maintain this (elite liberal) literary culture— but the collapse of literacy was so total that by the time it was even viable there was no longer a market for it.
The real market is for “podcasts”— but even podcasts are over in favor of every podcast becoming a video, if not a livestream video. To write a book is only meaningful now to the dwindling population of NPR liberals. Youth culture has no relation to books. There is no “zoomer harry potter.”
There are videos of Haz & I talking about whatever from years ago that have twelve times as many Youtube views as Knausgaard being interviewed on NPR. Literary “celebrity” does not exist. John Green was the last one.
The meme of the “performative male reader” is the end of it all. “Reading books” has become solely an “aesthetic”— a performance— because no one is entertained by books now. Books now are “going to the gym” which may be trendy but is only “an aesthetic”— alongside “bedrot”
People now have “movie watch lists” and act like watching movies is “work” in the way reading a book is “work.” Check out how many movies I’ve watched! Wow! That is the intellectual culture of today. Not even tenured professors are reading contemporary fiction.
If you go to a book store right now— take note in the new arrivals— how many books are japanese translations with a cat on the cover or in the title? The publishing industry has found that “lo-fi homework beats” japanese books with cats is the most profitable market for contemporary fiction.
Why is that? Because a cozy japanese book about cats framed next to your matcha is “a vibe” for your “dark academic” autumn instagram feed. This is what “reading books” means now.
(My friend is a translator of japanese literature & clued me in to this & now I count them every time. There were 12 most recently.)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Bugonia was very beautifully shot, great score etc— no complaints on a technical proficiency, acting performances were fantastic. It will probably be more beloved than Eddington for the same reasons I feel that it was not as good as Eddington.
I laughed a lot— but it’s really all in service of a very cheap sort of misanthropy. This misanthropy is in some sense complicated by a reverence for authoritarian structures over what is implied as the ultimately evil nature of “populism” — but it is not so much a reverence for Communism as it is reverence for the World Economic Forum. A Greek director who after the EU raped his country comes to the conclusion “humans are sick apes.”
Joe Cross in Eddington is sympathetic to a degree— pitiable— but the way Bugonia wants you to feel about its Joe Cross equivalent is basically the way a Nazi wants you to feel about shtetl jews.
I'm not here to moralize-- I'm just describing how our economy was set up to work. Most EBT recipients work-- they work, & their wages are not enough to pay for their cost of living & debt servicing etc. If you, as the state, intercede & cover their food costs (or subsidize them)-- that means there is more money from the wages that can go to "debt servicing" etc.
If, now, every working EBT recipient has to pay for all their food-- their new household spending will have to take more money from wages to pay for the food-- this means, less money is available for "debt servicing" etc. Maybe now all those klarna debts stop getting paid off.
The reason we subsidize food is because America is a net exporter of food. We subsidize demand for Cereal. That's the way you ought to think of it. Think of Cereal Boxes. Ok? So if a bunch of cereal boxes are bought with EBT every day-- that's the State writing checks to General Mills.
We simultaneously celebrate Individualism, & recognize that Individualism is actually deeply evil unless wedded with a Collectivist sense of individual self-sacrifice. This is the paradox of the "Anti-Christian" West. We play fast & loose with "Individualism"-- "Jesus Christ was a True Individualist"-- but Jesus Christ was a Communist...
This is simply to say-- that we celebrate Evil, & simultaneously collect rents for preaching against Evil. Everyone is very loose with this arrangement. Everyone's got an evil side-hustle. Evil 6 days out of the week, but going to Church, touching home base, on the 7th.
This is across denominations, affiliations, etc. This is just the ethics of the West. Democrat, Republican, Mormon, Scientologist-- it is the same pattern-- there is the 6 days of evil, washed away by the 7th day of institutional forgiveness.
Racism is not some universal thing-- racism is always particular, because race does not transcend history. For Americans, China *must* be imagined as "pre-historical" ie: as the "Heathen Chinee" who have not yet "entered history" under the dominion of the Catholic Church/The West (etc). Americans do not think that the Chinese are less innately capable than themselves (in fact, they fear that they are more capable, even the White Supremacists have to make copes about how median population IQ doesn't matter *that* much etc)-- they simply say "the Heathen Chinee do not know good from evil in the way we do"-- this means that they are also not capable of the evil we are capable of (& here-- to impose your will by evil means & get away with it is simply called WINNING). The Heathen Chinee are considered "naive"-- this is a distinct type of racism compared to, let's say, the racism against Indians...
The racism against China is "they are not creative"-- this means, really, they are not as comfortable with evil. Creativity is infernal, really-- the arts are a "deal with the devil"-- Lucifer, Angel of Music-- Tubal-Cain, the creator of the arts-- this is, in truth, what the West prides itself on. In "not following the rules"-- in "anarchy"-- in "individualism"-- in "faustianism" as Spengler called it. In making deals with the Devil. An extreme fascination with evil, unparalleled in any other society.
I do not think "True Crime" is popular in China. Is that racist? There are population differences, historically produced, materially constructed distinctions in human adaptation to differing socio-political environments. I am simply describing what China looks like to the Folk Cosmos of the American Civic Religion.
How deeply I wish the average reader of Dostoevsky's Karamazov understood the scope of its intended sequel. Knausgaard misunderstands the parable of the Grand Inquisitor here-- & also Dostoevsky's proto-communism-- because he just lacks the context of the work.
Knausgaard is not a very "political" thinker-- so he doesn't grasp that Dostoevsky was actually sentenced to death for revolutionary activism before the sentence was commuted (V. Nabokov's grandfather gave him books when he was imprisoned).
The Grand Inquisitor is not a *materialist*-- he is a CATHOLIC-- which to the Slavophilic Dostoevsky-- is to say a WESTERN SUPREMACIST-- the Orthodox Church does not have a "Grand Inquisitor"
The funniest thing in OBAA is that the fascists & the "revolutionaries" have completely parallel structures-- funniest scene is Pat having to demand to "talk to the manager" of a low level call center revolutionary. It actually equates the Fascists & Revolutionaries multiple times. It's fundamentally apolitical-- in the sense that "being personally invested" in politics, individually & narcissistically, is presented as evil. The only noble characters are "just living their lives" which so happen to include "acts of resistance"-- all the Latinos are not "being revolutionary" -- their lives have just incorporated routine escapes from las migras-- Benicio, the Sensei, is never stressed or concerned about any of it. It's just another day in his life. He's not shouting "VIVA LA REVOLUCION" he smirks & raises a fist like he's humoring a child. It is the white chauvinists & black chauvinists who make "the revolution/counterrevolution" about *themselves* personally that are presented as being in the wrong. They are in the wrong because they do not subject "politics" to the interests of Family.
Really, the low-key message to it is that the mixture of Black & White (ie: the becoming of the Latin American "cosmic man" mixture of the peoples into a new ethnogenesis) is the solution to the dialectic of White / Black Supremacists. This is more obviously the case when one considers that PTA's children are mixed race, his wife is mixed race, etc.
PTA deflates the African American ethnonarcissism by noting that the Indigenous have been "occupied" for longer than the slave plantations even existed. The Latinos are presented as the solution to America's racial antagonisms. Everyone can just become Latino.