Why do repo rates change and what do they have to do with reserves. This is a super technical issue and there are better folks to follow on this topic than me but I'll give it a go.
Firstly what are the two sides of a repo transaction and why do they want to interact.
One side is a guy with a bank deposit he wants to earn interest on. The other is a guy who wants to borrow money overnight and has assets he owns that he is willing to provide as collateral to the loan. We can go down a level on each side but for now let's keep it simple.
Most repo transactions are done with UST as the collateral and most UST collatarel used is TBills but. UST's are also highly common collateral but do to the marked to market risk they offer less borrowing capacity per unit of notional (higher haircut)
Anyway the repo occurs when a lender/saver lends cash to a borrower and the borrower pledges collateral. An interest rate is negotiated between the parties.
There are NO bank reserves involved in the transaction as the lender had a bank deposit which he hands to the borrower
While I just said no bank reserves are involved in the transaction I was talking about bank reserves in aggregate. Both sides of the transaction DO impact the bank reserves of their particular bank.
If JPM is the lender's bank and C is the borrowers' bank. JPM reduces reserves and C increase reserves to settle the deposit shift.
Because that could stress an individual bank whose depositors decide to enter repo transactions with borrowers at other banks reserve stress can occur. If there are abundant system wide reserves it's also pretty likely that individual banks have abundant reserves so reserves
matter for that reason. Less reserves with lots of Repo volume could mean some stress in individual banks
But before we deal with banks both from a greasing the skids standpoint and a party to a repo transaction let's step back to the simple example
A saver is constantly looking for the highest return on cash at all times. Most of these large savings involved in repo are large institutions which corporations and individuals provide their bank deposit to help them get interest. Perhaps the biggest most relevant institution
Is the MMF manager. They have four primary places to lend cash
Bills
RRP
Wholesale bank deposits
Repo market lending
Wholesale bank deposits are structurally low interest rate payers so those aren't used much
Bills are not overnight and so require MMF mangers to lock in rates for days weeks and months. RRP offers a low interest rate near or at the low end of the fed funds rate. Repo rates are the ones that fluctuate with supply and demand overnight. Bills fluctuate as well.
The MMF is constantly comparing those alternatives and directing money to the most attractive place.
During QT when the fed is getting paid back on maturing net debt the private sector is paying the fed back. The way they do that is with bank deposits if they are non banks
Though the mechanics is the deposit is spent and reserves move from the depositors bank to the Fed
MMF's pay the Fed back by reducing their RRP investment (thought they could also sell and asset to a bank or a non bank deposit holder or reduce repo lending
And banks of course pay the Fed back by sending a reserve.
But what happens in QT is lendable cash declines. Which reduces supply of cash to all who want to borrow it. But again it's not the reserve decrease its the investor who has cash and wants to lend that loses resources
That less lendable cash tends to raise repo rates AND Bills rates
The borrower also experiences changes in its desire to borrow money in the repo market. Let's talk about why the borrower is borrowing in the first place. Most repo borrowers are doing it because they want
Financial leverage to buy assets. Those assets could be anything at all. From real assets to meme stocks and crypto. It times of credit stress they also can need to borrow cash to pay other obligations that are suddenly coming due.
Any way borrowing demand fluctuates for
Many reasons.
Currently some big things have disrupted the supply and demand for Repo. Number 1 of course is the fairly sudden refilling of the TGA. That has gotten a bit high but not unusually so lately and in a mechanical way. That has consumed some supply of lending
On the demand side some credit stress seems to have occurred in BDC space which may have pushed up rates.
Of course borrowing for greed and momentum may also occurs but if I had to guess the issue is less lending supply due to residual QT and TGA build and some demand from
Debt paydown needs
Banks generally have no need to lend at crappy repo rates and have plenty of options to keep reserves at IORB but of course they can also jump in at elevated rates.
OTOH some banks may have scarce reserves particularly if they are exposed to credit risks
Or because their own clients are leaving for the repo market returns.
In that case the bank has a few options. It needs reserves cuz they're low. Reserves can be borrowed using repo or via SFR or DW. But the next step
Is when do they raise permanent reserves. That can take time. But unless the situation escalates the cost to the stress bank is very modest and can be minimized by jumping into SFR. They'll. Do that if they are struggling to rebalance their reserves
On the other hand IF and only if system wide reserves are indeed suddenly scarce more aggressive action by the Fed would be needed. What's happening is a little interbank rebalance and a little credit stress and a little system tightens for TGA. It will all work itself out fine.
If it doesn't the rates will have to stay elevated and and escalate and SRF will have to grow rapidly. Before that it's mostly worth ignoring
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Some thoughts on 10 year notes since Powell guided for a restart of the cutting cycle at Jackson Hole. Trying to answer what the bond market is saying
Nominal yields have fallen 33bp
Note yields are driven lower by
1)Falling real GDP expectations
2)Falling Inflation expectations 3) Falling "risk" of owning assets 4) Improving supply/demand balance vs expectations.
In attributing nominal yield changes to these 4 things unfortunately market prices don't
Easily demonstrate these things. For instance 3&4 are only able to be measured via a model which estimates risk premiums or the expected return over holding cash
Even Breakeven inflation and real TIPS yields have risk premium buried in there market yields. However we can try
SPX has a trailing earnings yield of 4% with expected 1 year earnings growth of 11.7%. What's the bull case? For me the bull case is a combination of simply collecting the earnings accrual
and having the multiple expand slightly. In that case a 16% return would occur which is roughly 1 std higher and happens 1 out of 6 timer.
The big driver of equity returns is the accrual of earnings. Over the last 5 years earnings accrual has dominated historic returns
As long as companies continue to grow earnings they will go up over the long term.
Multiples rise and fall and as can be seen in the chart can dominate performance of equities in the short term. Furthermore multiples are impacted by interest rates
I YR return Asset bull cases part 1a
10 Year notes
10 year notes yield 4% today. What's the bull case? Let's talk about an unusually good absolute return that would happen 1 in 6 times this year meaning 1STD or more. That would be a 6% price rise Along with a 6% price move
One would also get a 4% coupon generating a 10% return and an excess return over cash of 6.5%. That's pretty good and could be leveraged 2.5x to have the same risk as SPX and generate 16.25% return.
What would that mean mechanically?
A 6% price move would require 9 year yields which are roughly 3.95% to be 3.22
A year from now.
The bull case for bonds depends on whether the odds of 3.22% yields occuring is 1:6. If the odds are higher the bonds are a buy if lower then bonds are a sell.
By far the most important one is they become insolvent
An insolvent company has negative equity. Its assets are worth less than its debt. For a bank the largest debtor is the depositor but other debtors exist as well.
Banks risk insolvency due to higher leverage of their equity relative to any other non financial company
Bank assets are also subject to sudden repricing when the loans and securities banks own default or like in the "Banking Crisis of 2023" the assets reprice rapidly due to a change in the risk free interest rate.
This chart Should not be new to anyone that has my work since 2022. @SteveMiran used and credited my work to write his paper on ATI which probably helped him get the Fed Governor Gig😅.I have presented my work to many Fed staffers and senior treasury officials many times. BUT 🧵
The Fed bears only partial responsibility to the muting of QT. QT impact is two fold reducing reserves HAS occurred. Though not much and mostly just reduced pseudo reserves in the form or RRP reduction to zero.
BUT by far the biggest impact of QT is the forcing of the private
Sector to absorb duration. As written in my DSR of 3/14/2022 before QT had even formally been announced I described how choosing runoff vs outright sales when implementing QT was handing monetary policy to the treasury. dampedspring.com/wp-content/upl…
I raised cash yesterday by selling 20% of my liquid net worth of assets holdings. I sold gold, long term bonds and stocks without view on one asset vs another. Just raised cash while keeping my asset allocation roughly constant.
I now hold 50% of my AUM in cash. Why would I do that. What makes me want less of an asset portfolio I'll refer to now as Beta and more cash.
Well my decision hinges on various factors and all are based on expectations
For centuries and certainly recently policymakers have debased their currency which makes holding assets more attractive than holding cash currency. But we all know this. So to trigger a change in one's portfolio you have to expect a different amount of debasement relative