“It’s a terrible thing that’s happened to the family… I feel badly for them.”
President Donald Trump expressed sympathy not for survivors and victims of Epstein, but for King Charles and the British royal family as they try to contain the fallout from Andrew’s ties to Jeffrey Epstein.
Photo not my own, taken during reporter questions
1
His comments came just days after King Charles took decisive action and stripped Andrew of his royal title and removed him from official royal duties.
2
Why now? The pressure. The royals have long known about the allegations from Virginia Giuffre about Andrew. They knew a young woman claimed he had sexually abused her and that she was trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell.
Still, it took newly uncovered emails showing Andrew tried to “catch up” with Epstein only months after Epstein was released from prison.
And it took Virginia speaking up one final time (her memoir was punished after her death earlier this year.)
3
In the U.S., some lawmakers are calling for Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor to testify before Congress about his relationship with Epstein. No subpoena yet, but pressure is rising.
4
In the U.K., Defence Minister John Healey confirmed that Andrew will also lose his final military title: Vice Admiral of the Royal Navy.
5
Trump, who has been hosted by King Charles for two state visits this year, has often spoken fondly of the monarchy.
He now appears to be defending the family during a time of public accountability.
6
Trump isn’t outside the story. Democrats recently resurfaced a 2003 birthday message to Epstein signed “Donald,” found in Epstein’s leather-bound birthday book. Trump denies having anything to do with it, but it’s well known the two men were socially connected for many years.
7
Earlier this year, activists projected images of Trump and Epstein onto Windsor Castle during his state visit. Four people were arrested.
8
So for anyone keeping track, we now have:
-King of England forced to act against his own brother.
- U.S. president defending the monarchy while facing Epstein-related scrutiny himself.
9
Once again, this is about power shielding itself from accountability.
Epstein may be dead, but his network, his secrets, and the people who enabled him are very much alive. The survivors are still fighting for transparency. And so am I. We aren’t finished yet
Subscribe to support my work and to access deep dives here and at substack (link in bio) because I’m unstoppable and will continue to bring you the truth.
I will continue to relentlessly track this story and stand with the survivors demanding truth and justice. But my work is reader funded so please invest.
🚨UPDATE
A federal judge in the James Comey case said newly-appointed prosecutor Lindsey Halligan must turn over a full transcript of grand jury indictment proceedings, including her own statements.
1
This comes after Comey moved to dismiss the case, arguing selective/vindictive prosecution and claiming the prosecutor, Lindsey Halligan, was unlawfully appointed.
2
James Comey was indicted in late September on charges of making false statements and obstructing a congressional proceeding. He has pleaded not guilty.
His legal team argues the case is political retaliation from President Donald Trump.
Comey’s team argues Halligan, a former personal Trump attorney, was improperly installed as interim U.S. Attorney after Erik Siebert resigned under White House pressure and therefore the indictment is invalid.
🚨 BREAKING:
There was an active federal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s alleged co-conspirators all the way until September 2025 — and then it abruptly stopped.
Now a Maryland lawmaker, Rep. Jamie Raskin, is demanding answers from the DOJ about who shut it down and why.
1
Raskin sent a formal letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi asking why the DOJ ended the probe after survivors, prosecutors, and FBI agents spent years building it, only to have it suddenly transferred to DOJ headquarters and halted.
Photo of Raskin
2
In his words:
“Why has the DOJ abandoned the women and girls abused by Mr. Epstein, Ms. Maxwell, and their co-conspirators… and ceased its investigation into one of the largest sex trafficking rings in history?”
🚨 BREAKING
Confirmed what I called out yesterday when I exposed “journalist” Jay Beecher for smearing Virginia Giuffre.
He was paid to do it. 🔥 I will find them all and call them out. For survivors. ✊🏼🖤
A thread
According to The Times, Beecher was paid £80,000, funded by Brian Basham (Ghislaine Maxwell’s PR ally) to help create a book aimed at discrediting Virginia.
Not my image but from right: Ghislaine Maxwell, Brian Basham, Virginia Giuffre and the man formerly known as Prince Andrew
Stripping a Prince of his title is not justice — it’s PR.
Call him Andrew whatever you want now.
I’m more interested in hearing: “The investigation is now criminal.”
1
Andrew kept his title through lawsuits, flight logs and settlements.
Only after the Queen died—after Virginia died—and her memoir hit the world, did the Palace act.
They knew. They waited. They chose silence over justice.
2
When Virginia first accused Prince Andrew, the response wasn’t investigation.
Instead, it was denial and victim character assassination. The Palace issued statements defending him.
British tabloids smeared her endlessly, calling her “money-seeking” and “fantasist.” There are still bot farms that attempt to smear her name anytime I post about this.
Perhaps they are more concerned about protecting the institution than justice for survivors.
Rep Thomas Massie is on the right track asking where the $1b from Epstein’s account went to after his death.
The answer: it didn’t disappear by accident. It was moved by design.
2
Two days before he was found dead, Epstein quietly signed a will.
In it, he transferred more than $577 million of his known assets into a secretive trust in the Virgin Islands called “The 1953 Trust.”
Why does that matter? Because trusts make assets harder for victims to reach, and it continues to pay people in Epstein’s network, even today.
3
The rest (an amount totaling over $1 billion in “suspicious transactions” flagged by JPMorgan) was already sitting in shell companies, offshore accounts, private LLCs and bank structures built to shield money from public view. It was a series of strategic moves by Epstein and his accountants and lawyers that made $1b “disappear.”
🚨NEW
Bloomberg’s drip release of Jeffrey Epstein’s email account is starting to expose the cover-up.
This week’s batch confirms a buried federal money-laundering investigation that could’ve brought Epstein (and his powerful enablers) down for good.
2
The latest details show that in February 2007, Assistant U.S. Attorney Marie Villafaña opened a money-laundering probe into Epstein and six of his companies.
She subpoenaed every financial transaction since 2003 — and warned her bosses not to close the sex-crime plea deal until the money trail was fully traced.