Noel Ceta Profile picture
Nov 3 โ€ข 11 tweets โ€ข 3 min read โ€ข Read on X
The $500/month SEO agency destroyed a client's 10-year-old domain in 4 months.

The $8K/month agency grew their traffic 340% in the same timeframe.

Here's why quality SEO can't be cheap: ๐Ÿงต
1/ The math doesn't lie:

Quality SEO requires real labor hours:

Minimum monthly deliverables:

- Technical audit & fixes: 12 hours
- Keyword research & strategy: 8 hours
- Content creation (4 articles): 40 hours
- Link building (15-20 links): 30 hours
- Reporting & analysis: 6 hours
- Client communication: 4 hours

Total: 100 hours/month minimum
2/ Breaking down the real costs:

At 100 hours monthly with qualified team:

SEO Strategist ($100-150/hr): 20 hrs = $2,000-3,000
Content Writer ($50-80/hr): 40 hrs = $2,000-3,200
Link Builder ($60-90/hr): 30 hrs = $1,800-2,700
Technical SEO ($80-120/hr): 10 hrs = $800-1,200

Labor alone: $6,600-10,100/month

Before tools, overhead, or profit margin.
3/ Tool costs are non-negotiable:

Professional SEO stack:

- Ahrefs: $399/month
- Semrush: $229/month
- Screaming Frog: $29/month
- Surfer SEO: $219/month
- Google Workspace: $30/month
- Project management: $50/month
- Misc tools: $150/month

Total tools: $1,086/month

These aren't optional for quality work.
4/ What $500/month SEO actually gets you:

The budget breakdown:

Total: $500
Tools: -$200 (bare minimum)
Overhead: -$100 (20%)
Profit: -$100 (20%)
Labor budget: $100

That's 2 hours of work per month at $50/hr.

What can you do in 2 hours? Almost nothing meaningful.
5/ The cheap SEO tactics:

How $500/month agencies "deliver":

โŒ Automated content spinning
โŒ PBN links (blackhat)
โŒ Keyword stuffing
โŒ Mass directory submissions
โŒ Blog comment spam
โŒ Article spinning services
โŒ Outsourced to $5/hr contractors

Result: Penalties, lost rankings, wasted time recovering.
6/ Real case study comparison:

Company A: Hired $500/month agency

6 months later:

- 23 manual penalties
- Traffic dropped 78%
- Lost 340 ranking keywords
- Cost to recover: $45K + 12 months
- Total damage: $200K+ in lost revenue

Company B: Hired $8K/month agency

6 months later:

- Traffic up 340%
- 890 new ranking keywords
- DR increased from 42 to 68
- Revenue attributed: $2.4M
7/ The $5K-10K monthly breakdown:

What this budget actually delivers:

Strategy & Management (15%): $750-1,500

- Monthly strategy planning
- Competitive analysis
- Performance reporting

Content Production (40%): $2,000-4,000

- 8-12 high-quality articles
- Content optimization
- Editorial oversight

Link Building (30%): $1,500-3,000

- 20-30 editorial links
- Outreach campaigns
- Relationship building

Technical SEO (15%): $750-1,500

- Monthly audits
- Implementation support
- Performance monitoring
8/ When you can spend less:

SEO under $5K/month works if:

โœ“ You're DIY with in-house team (just tools cost)
โœ“ Highly niche market (low competition)
โœ“ Maintenance mode (not growth phase)
โœ“ You do content, they do technical/strategy
โœ“ Local SEO only (different dynamics)

But for competitive B2B/ecommerce? $5K+ is baseline.
9/ The ROI justification:

SEO at $8K/month:

Annual investment: $96K

Conservative results (Year 1):

- 5,000 new organic sessions/month
- 3% conversion rate = 150 conversions
- $2,000 average deal value
- Monthly revenue: $300K
- Annual revenue: $3.6M

ROI: 37ร— return on investment

Good SEO pays for itself 40ร— over.
10/ Quality SEO costs $5K+ monthly because:

โœ“ Requires 100+ expert hours
โœ“ Professional tools cost $1K+
โœ“ Content quality matters (AI detection)
โœ“ Editorial links take time to earn
โœ“ Technical expertise isn't cheap
โœ“ Strategy requires experience
โœ“ Results compound over time

Cheap SEO = expensive mistakes.

Good SEO = investment that compounds.

Choose based on whether you want results or regrets.

Save this before your next SEO budget meeting

โ€ข โ€ข โ€ข

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
ใ€€

Keep Current with Noel Ceta

Noel Ceta Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @noelcetaSEO

Nov 3
A local HVAC company was getting 30 leads per month from their website.

18 months later: 200+ qualified leads monthly.

Here's the complete local SEO transformation: ๐Ÿงต
1/ Starting point (Month 0):

Business: HVAC services in Phoenix metro

Website metrics:

- 840 monthly organic sessions
- 30 leads/month (3.5% conversion rate)
- Ranking for 23 local keywords
- Google Business Profile: 4.2 stars, 87 reviews
- 3 service pages, 12 blog posts
- Zero local citations

Revenue from website: ~$45K/month
2/ The transformation strategy (7 pillars):

1. Google Business Profile optimization
2. Local citation building
3. Service area page expansion
4. Content strategy (local-focused)
5. Review generation system
6. Local link acquisition
7. Technical local SEO

Each pillar built on the previous foundation.
Read 13 tweets
Oct 31
Site architecture determines how much of your site Google can find and rank.

Most sites have terrible architecture.

Here's how to structure a site for maximum SEO: ๐Ÿงต

Repost + comment 'STRUCTURE' for my site architecture audit template.
1/ The Architecture Problem:

Bad structure symptoms:

โŒ Important pages 5+ clicks from homepage
โŒ Orphan pages (no internal links)
โŒ Flat structure (everything top-level)
โŒ Confusing navigation
โŒ Poor internal linking

Google struggles to crawl.
Pages don't rank.
2/ The Ideal Structure:

Hierarchical pyramid (for big sites):

Level 0: Homepage
Level 1: Main categories (5-7)
Level 2: Subcategories (3-5 per category)
Level 3: Individual pages
Level 4: Supporting content (if needed)

Every page โ‰ค3 clicks from homepage.
Read 14 tweets
Oct 31
500 articles analyzed to find what predicts ranking success before publishing.

A scoring system emerged with 87% accuracy for top 10 rankings.

Here's the exact framework: ๐Ÿงต
1/ Why most content fails:

People publish blindly:

No pre-publication quality check
Guessing what will rank
Inconsistent standards
No predictive metrics

A system was needed to know if content would succeed BEFORE hitting publish.
2/ The Content Success Score (CSS):

A 100-point system across 5 categories:

Technical SEO (20 points)
Content Depth (25 points)
User Intent Match (20 points)
Authority Signals (20 points)
Engagement Optimization (15 points)

Score 70+: 87% chance of top 10 ranking
Score 50-69: 52% chance of top 10 ranking
Score <50: 18% chance of top 10 ranking
Read 12 tweets
Oct 30
I ran a 6-month experiment: $10K on new content vs $10K on updating existing content.

The ROI difference was shocking.

Here's the data on why content updates win: ๐Ÿงต
1/ The experiment setup:

Two identical budgets, different strategies:

Strategy A (New Content):

$10,000 budget
40 new articles created
2,000-2,500 words each
Promoted equally

Strategy B (Content Updates):

$10,000 budget
120 existing articles updated
Added 500-1,000 words each
Same promotion effort

6 months later, results measured.
2/ Strategy A results (New Content):

40 new articles published:

Traffic impact:

4,200 new monthly sessions
Average position: 18.7
23 articles ranking in top 20
8 articles ranking in top 10
Time to rank: 90-120 days

ROI: 42% traffic increase
Cost per ranking article: $1,250
Read 15 tweets
Oct 30
I scaled SEO operations from 5 sites to 50+ without additional hires.

The key wasnโ€™t working harder. It was building efficient processes.

Here's the framework for SEO processes that actually scale: ๐Ÿงต
1/ The scaling problem most SEO teams face:

You're stuck in the execution trap:

Doing all keyword research manually
Writing all content yourself
Building links one by one
Fighting fires daily
No documentation
Can't delegate

You are the bottleneck. Process fixes this.
2/ What makes a process "scalable"?

A scalable process is:
โœ“ Documented (anyone can follow it)
โœ“ Repeatable (same result every time)
โœ“ Measurable (clear success metrics)
โœ“ Improvable (data-driven optimization)
โœ“ Delegable (doesn't require you)

Without these 5 elements, it won't scale.
Read 14 tweets
Oct 29
Merged 87 weak articles into 12 comprehensive guides.

Organic traffic increased 156% in 90 days.

No new content. Just strategic consolidation.

Here's the exact content merging framework: ๐Ÿงต
1/ Why content consolidation works:

Google rewards depth over quantity.

Problems with thin content:

Keyword cannibalization (pages competing)
Diluted authority (weak links spread thin)
Poor user experience (scattered information)
Lower rankings (insufficient depth)

One strong page beats 10 weak ones.
2/ The content consolidation audit process:

Step 1: Export all URLs and metrics

Use Screaming Frog + GSC to gather:

All published URLs
Organic traffic per page
Ranking keywords per page
Backlinks per page
Word count per page

Build a master spreadsheet with this data.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(