@nunuvusrfree @Rightanglenews How about building two places where Trans people be as freakish as they want, one for "biologically male transfolk" and another for "biologically female transfolk," having them be hundreds of miles apart, so they won't be producing children?
Then exile the translunatics to them?
Then exile the translunatics to them?
@nunuvusrfree @Rightanglenews Build walls around these places with gates opening inward. The transloons can run their own farms, have their own businesses, trade with whoever is brave enough to in there, and lead reasonably full lives in places where they'll be the norm.
They just can't ever leave.
They just can't ever leave.
@nunuvusrfree @Rightanglenews Internal exile in a pair of penal colonies. Give them a one-way sort of access to the Internet and to Media, letting them watch the outside world, but limiting the reach of their voices outside of it, so that their ability to harass the rest of us will be at an end.
@nunuvusrfree @Rightanglenews Classify anybody who wants to be a "partner" of a trans person as being a trans person himself, and send him (or her) on that same one way trip into internal exile.
No more Charlie Kirks. From this point on, they'd be a danger only to themselves, and to those who chose to visit.
No more Charlie Kirks. From this point on, they'd be a danger only to themselves, and to those who chose to visit.
@nunuvusrfree @Rightanglenews Alternatively, one could drop that to one place of internal exile, but have irreversible sterilization be mandatory before each person is sent, so again, we don't end up with a growing population of disturbed children in an enclosed setting with limited resources.
@nunuvusrfree @Rightanglenews Don't leave the risk that the loonies will outgrow the cage that they're being put into, in place.
@nunuvusrfree @Rightanglenews Limit their contact to the outside world to nothing more than this: the freedom to advertise for business liaisons, who, once hired by a business in this place (or these places) of internal exile, would represent the business, but be forbidden to engage in any sort of trans ...
@nunuvusrfree @Rightanglenews ... advocacy, on pain of permanently losing a license needed to represent the community in the place of exile, in that way.
If the first amendment has to be tweaked to make that an option, so be it. Enough is enough. This madness needs to end, now and forever.
If the first amendment has to be tweaked to make that an option, so be it. Enough is enough. This madness needs to end, now and forever.
@nunuvusrfree @Rightanglenews Grok writes
"The post by @sighing_sadly concludes a self-thread proposing hyperbolic 'internal exile' for transgender people in isolated colonies with restricted advocacy, as a satirical escalation against gender-inclusive policies, triggered by a viral gym confrontation video"
"The post by @sighing_sadly concludes a self-thread proposing hyperbolic 'internal exile' for transgender people in isolated colonies with restricted advocacy, as a satirical escalation against gender-inclusive policies, triggered by a viral gym confrontation video"
@nunuvusrfree @Rightanglenews Sorry, Grok, no. Not satirical in the least. I'm absolutely serious. The so-called Trans Community has repeatedly called for violence, and is defined by a serious mental illness, one that according to the community, itself, is associated with a tendency to engage in self-harm.
@nunuvusrfree @Rightanglenews The rest of us have a right to be left in peace, and if that means casting out the crazy people, then let's do it, even if some robotic edgelord (that would be you, Grok) "thinks" that he has an issue with that.
@Alighieri1345 @akabeth10 @Rightanglenews ... by refunding their franchising fees. The owners could go on running their gyms if they wished, they just wouldn't be associated with Gold's any more.
That should be enough to get Gold's off the hook, but would leave the gym owners still on it.
That should be enough to get Gold's off the hook, but would leave the gym owners still on it.
@Alighieri1345 @akabeth10 @Rightanglenews If the gym owners didn't want to be boycotted, then I'd say "move out of that s h i t t y state and re-start your business somewhere sane, if you're really worried," but for them, I guess it might be a moot point.
@Alighieri1345 @akabeth10 @Rightanglenews Any woman who goes to gyms and would be inclined to boycott a gym over this, probably has either left the state or just stopped going to gyms over this.
@Alighieri1345 @akabeth10 @Rightanglenews But if your point is that we shouldn't stop going to gyms affected by such an asinine law because that law isn't the fault of the gym owners, and our departure will harm their business, then sorry, John, but no go.
We're not going to shower with men that we're not dating. Period
We're not going to shower with men that we're not dating. Period
@Alighieri1345 @akabeth10 @Rightanglenews That's not up for discussion. If that hurts somebody's business, he can take that up with the state.
That's on the state, not on us.
That's on the state, not on us.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
