🚨 BREAKING:
There was an active federal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s alleged co-conspirators all the way until September 2025 — and then it abruptly stopped.
Now a Maryland lawmaker, Rep. Jamie Raskin, is demanding answers from the DOJ about who shut it down and why.
1
Raskin sent a formal letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi asking why the DOJ ended the probe after survivors, prosecutors, and FBI agents spent years building it, only to have it suddenly transferred to DOJ headquarters and halted.
Photo of Raskin
2
In his words:
“Why has the DOJ abandoned the women and girls abused by Mr. Epstein, Ms. Maxwell, and their co-conspirators… and ceased its investigation into one of the largest sex trafficking rings in history?”
3
He points out what makes this stunning and what I have been shouting about nonstop.
Nearly 50 survivors spoke to the FBI and SDNY prosecutors.
They provided names, locations, flight logs, financial links, methods of recruitment, and at least 20 men they were trafficked to.
Prosecutors were allegedly still working the leads until fall 2025.
4
Then (without warning) SDNY prosecutors were told to transfer their Epstein files to DOJ HQ in D.C.
No explanation. No new charges. Nothing.
Several prosecutors were reassigned or removed from the case. Maurene Comey comes to mind. She was fired without warning or known cause earlier this year, after prosecuting Maxwell and also Sean “Diddy” Combs.
She has since filed suit, saying her firing was politically motivated.
5
Survivors’ attorneys are saying the investigation didn’t “finish” it was stopped.
And it wasn’t due to lack of evidence.
It was a decision. It was intentional.
6
The DOJ later put out a release saying there was no “client list” and no credible evidence to charge anyone else. Case closed.
But that directly conflicts with what survivors, FBI agents, and SDNY prosecutors said — many of them insist the investigation was still active and supported by detailed evidence when it was shut down.
7
Raskin says this isn’t just bureaucratic sloppiness, but it’s a betrayal.
Survivors gave the government names, evidence, and trust. In response, the DOJ shut down the investigation and sidelined prosecutors.
Now he’s demanding every memo, staffing record, and FBI interview that explains why this happened.
8
So here’s the real question:
Why did the Trump DOJ shut down an active investigation into powerful men accused of sexual crimes against minors… right as it was gaining traction?
Who benefits from silence?
9
I’ll be doing a deep dive on substack (link in bio) so make sure you’re following or subscribed 🖤
Other ways to support my reader-funded work, so I can keep doing this:
CashApp $AWSInvestigates
🚨UPDATE
A federal judge in the James Comey case said newly-appointed prosecutor Lindsey Halligan must turn over a full transcript of grand jury indictment proceedings, including her own statements.
1
This comes after Comey moved to dismiss the case, arguing selective/vindictive prosecution and claiming the prosecutor, Lindsey Halligan, was unlawfully appointed.
2
James Comey was indicted in late September on charges of making false statements and obstructing a congressional proceeding. He has pleaded not guilty.
His legal team argues the case is political retaliation from President Donald Trump.
Comey’s team argues Halligan, a former personal Trump attorney, was improperly installed as interim U.S. Attorney after Erik Siebert resigned under White House pressure and therefore the indictment is invalid.
🚨 BREAKING
Confirmed what I called out yesterday when I exposed “journalist” Jay Beecher for smearing Virginia Giuffre.
He was paid to do it. 🔥 I will find them all and call them out. For survivors. ✊🏼🖤
A thread
According to The Times, Beecher was paid £80,000, funded by Brian Basham (Ghislaine Maxwell’s PR ally) to help create a book aimed at discrediting Virginia.
Not my image but from right: Ghislaine Maxwell, Brian Basham, Virginia Giuffre and the man formerly known as Prince Andrew
“It’s a terrible thing that’s happened to the family… I feel badly for them.”
President Donald Trump expressed sympathy not for survivors and victims of Epstein, but for King Charles and the British royal family as they try to contain the fallout from Andrew’s ties to Jeffrey Epstein.
Photo not my own, taken during reporter questions
1
His comments came just days after King Charles took decisive action and stripped Andrew of his royal title and removed him from official royal duties.
2
Why now? The pressure. The royals have long known about the allegations from Virginia Giuffre about Andrew. They knew a young woman claimed he had sexually abused her and that she was trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell.
Still, it took newly uncovered emails showing Andrew tried to “catch up” with Epstein only months after Epstein was released from prison.
And it took Virginia speaking up one final time (her memoir was punished after her death earlier this year.)
Stripping a Prince of his title is not justice — it’s PR.
Call him Andrew whatever you want now.
I’m more interested in hearing: “The investigation is now criminal.”
1
Andrew kept his title through lawsuits, flight logs and settlements.
Only after the Queen died—after Virginia died—and her memoir hit the world, did the Palace act.
They knew. They waited. They chose silence over justice.
2
When Virginia first accused Prince Andrew, the response wasn’t investigation.
Instead, it was denial and victim character assassination. The Palace issued statements defending him.
British tabloids smeared her endlessly, calling her “money-seeking” and “fantasist.” There are still bot farms that attempt to smear her name anytime I post about this.
Perhaps they are more concerned about protecting the institution than justice for survivors.
Rep Thomas Massie is on the right track asking where the $1b from Epstein’s account went to after his death.
The answer: it didn’t disappear by accident. It was moved by design.
2
Two days before he was found dead, Epstein quietly signed a will.
In it, he transferred more than $577 million of his known assets into a secretive trust in the Virgin Islands called “The 1953 Trust.”
Why does that matter? Because trusts make assets harder for victims to reach, and it continues to pay people in Epstein’s network, even today.
3
The rest (an amount totaling over $1 billion in “suspicious transactions” flagged by JPMorgan) was already sitting in shell companies, offshore accounts, private LLCs and bank structures built to shield money from public view. It was a series of strategic moves by Epstein and his accountants and lawyers that made $1b “disappear.”
🚨NEW
Bloomberg’s drip release of Jeffrey Epstein’s email account is starting to expose the cover-up.
This week’s batch confirms a buried federal money-laundering investigation that could’ve brought Epstein (and his powerful enablers) down for good.
2
The latest details show that in February 2007, Assistant U.S. Attorney Marie Villafaña opened a money-laundering probe into Epstein and six of his companies.
She subpoenaed every financial transaction since 2003 — and warned her bosses not to close the sex-crime plea deal until the money trail was fully traced.