A big mistake I made in promoting the truth about feminine beauty was trying to do it all by myself. In this thread I'll explain why you need an army to change public opinion. In this case, an army of exceptionally charming women.
So, now that my amazing co-host Carmen @musecontour is posting on feminine beauty I see why doing it all myself was never going to work. She posts in a different style from a different angle, and it's going to reach different people.
I've gotten all the main facts and logic down in DISPELLING BEAUTY LIES. But this battle isn't about spamming logic in the public square, because what we're fighting against isn't competing logic but competing illogic. We're fighting against people's biases.
We need to get the truth through a psychological shield that women have built up. Even if my own voice were great at doing that (it's not), the same voice can't get through every shield, because they're all tuned a little differently. Everyone trusts different people.
Beyond that there's something we learned in covid. If R0>1 then an idea spreads by itself; if R0<1, it disappears unless you keep reseeding it. Well, the truth about feminine beauty has an R0<1. For now. We need superspreaders to keep reseeding it.
So, there's two reasons we need to recruit more influencers to the cause. One is that different communication styles reach different people, so to reach everyone we need many influencers with different styles. The other is a numbers problem. We need more people seeding the ideas.
Carmen didn't want to influence, but now that she's started doing it I think she's enjoying it more than she expected. All you have to do is say things you think are true or interesting using your own words. You don't have to do any beauty research, cause I've already done it!
So, if you're a reader who's benefited from reading DISPELLING BEAUTY LIES, why not try your own hand at evangelizing the truth about feminine beauty (and seduction)? It might be more fun than you think.
I realize my biggest fans are pretty shy. But you don't have to tell the public your personal details. Take a look at Carmen's account - she's not giving out personal details. And she's posting interesting and original things it wouldn't occur to me to say.
If you want to join our odalisque army and tell the public the truth about feminine beauty, you don't need to sign up officially. Just go for it. But if you want a helping hand, feel free to get in touch with either of us, or to use any of the resources in DISPELLING BEAUTY LIES.
Besides, now is a better time than ever. Public illusions are finally starting to weaken. More and more women are dipping their toes into the truth. Are you ready to pull them all the way in and conquer the world?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Readers, I have a confession. I've really struggled with the question of just how bad missionary position is and I'd like to get it right in the article. But because the data quality is so low, I have to be very vague to avoid giving wrong answers...
The problem is that the fairly large set of hentai videos I studied has basically NO missionary, but we know that can't be right. Logically, it's a position that just doesn't work well on video.
In surveys men seem to rate missionary reasonably well. But when I looked into surveys, they were all really bad quality. Usually they didn't break missionary out from any other front position. The one that did and had a big sample size gave some really implausible results.
In this thread I'm going to dig in and find out. Warning - not PG13.
First point to keep in mind is that wordless vocalization has a stronger impact than words. This is clear in erotic media for men. In some genres noises are continuous through the entire video. Hentai is a great example because there are voice actresses specifically to do this.
I can't emphasize the benefits of wordless vocalization strongly enough. So, if you haven't read it yet I suggest you click on the link in the next post and go through the examples and explanations included in my seduction advice.
Episode 6 of the DISPELLING BEAUTY LIES podcast is called "Market Forces." It explains why the most popular look isn't always the best, and why weird looks can be attractive. It also answers your burning questions about butt size and... harem animes! Listen now at the link below.
AI EXPLAINS WHAT WOMEN REALLY THINK ABOUT SYDNEY SWEENEY
I asked Grok whether women really understand Sydney's popularity or not. Here's what he said.👇
"Women generally recognize that Sydney Sweeney's popularity is driven by her large breasts relative to her slim frame."
Ok, so far so good. But we're not done.
"It's not a case of naivety; rather, they see the breast-centric narrative as the reality, with explanations like charm serving as a male rationalization."
Impressive insight. Maybe the world is changing. Maybe women are accepting reality? Or, maybe NOT....
WHY SYDNEY SWEENEY'S TRANSPARENT DRESS WILL CHANGE FASHION FOREVER
Catchy title, eh? Well, it's true. Breaking through the transparency barrier really will change the world. I'll explain in this thread, so keep reading!👇
Public decency standards have been steadily loosening for around 150 years, with brief steps back in the 1950s and 1980s. The changes have been slow and impacted different clothing elements, so you hardly notice them happening. But today a bright line has been crossed.
To simplify, immodesty progressed in three main stages.
1. During the 20th century, hemlines came up and necklines came down. This funny graph shows the progress.
Yes, I'm tired of being the most underappreciated writer on feminine beauty in the entire universe.
It's not immediately intuitive, but normalized transparency is very bad news for flat girls. That's because it cancels the one clear advantage they have at present: they can get away with a braless look that's been unacceptable for better-endowed women for decades.