It’s a *structural* problem. The machine which spends billion of dollars to employ tens of thousands of “civic engagement coordinators” can dominate low turnout elections. Nothing more, nothing less.
The GOP has to accept this instead of taking any silly lessons away like “we lost because we didn’t compromise enough”
The GOP has to accept this instead of taking any silly lessons away like “we lost because we didn’t compromise enough”
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/1985880327034745299
The problem with Republican donors playing catch-up is that it's also structural.
If you gave me a hundred million dollars, I would have no idea how to spend it to mobilize voters.
But Open Society would know how to squeeze every last penny for maximum inpact.
If you gave me a hundred million dollars, I would have no idea how to spend it to mobilize voters.
But Open Society would know how to squeeze every last penny for maximum inpact.
As an example, look at Indivisible job postings (for context, Indivisible organized NoKings). Their postings speak an entirely different vocabulary of expertise which is foreign to anyone who's working in the private sector. 
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
