Dan Neidle Profile picture
Nov 5, 2025 15 tweets 4 min read Read on X
What if there was a consensus on the tax reforms the UK needs?

What if it was backed by policy experts from think tanks across the political spectrum, from the Adam Smith Institute to the Resolution Foundation?

The consensus is real. The question is: will anyone act on it? Image
Launching today is a series of proposals backed by the Adam Smith Institute, Bright Blue, CenTax, the Centre for Policy Studies, the Institute for Public Policy Research, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, the New Economics Foundation, Resolution Foundation, Tax Policy Associates.
Everyone in that list disagrees on the fundamental political question of the size and role of the state.

But we all agree on how the basics of how the tax system should work. The rate is up for debate - but that's the easy bit.
All the proposed reforms could be tax-neutral: not tax cuts, not tax increases. Tax reforms to make the system more rational and drive growth.

(Or executed as tax cuts or tax increases, per your political preference)
Here's the list:
1. Abolish stamp duty on land Image
2. Scrap VAT exemptions/zero rates and lower the main rate (whilst protecting vulnerable groups). Image
3. End the high marginal rates faced by people coming off universal credit, earning £60k ot earning £100k. Marginal rates of 60%+ are a disgrace. Image
4. Merge employer and employee NICs with Income Tax Image
5. Tax landlords fairly - on their actual net income, and at the same rate as labour income. Image
6. Reform capital gains tax so it taxes real gains actually accrued in the UK Image
7. Reform the corporation tax base. End the capital/income distinction. Provide "full expensing" for all investment. End the bias towards debt. Image
I can't recall anything like this happening before. In part a credit to @CPSThinkTank, @CenTaxUK, @ASI, @IPPR, @NEF, @jrf_uk, @WeAreBrightBlue, @LabourTogether.

But in part a sign of the dire state of the tax system.
@CPSThinkTank @CenTaxUK @ASI @IPPR @NEF @jrf_uk @WeAreBrightBlue @LabourTogether We're overdue a Budget which doesn't just scrabble around for new revenue, but delivers on pro-growth reform.

I hope this Government will step up and, if they don't, that others will.
@CPSThinkTank @CenTaxUK @ASI @IPPR @NEF @jrf_uk @WeAreBrightBlue @LabourTogether Full details: centax.org.uk/tax-reforms-fo…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dan Neidle

Dan Neidle Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DanNeidle

Feb 5
Mandelson's firm, General Counsel, covered-up Mandelson's relationship with Epstein.

Here's Global Counsel's CEO and co-founder, preparing to tell the press that Mandelson barely knew Jeffrey Epstein.

Who did he check that line with?

Jeffrey Epstein. Image
They're responding to this Telegraph story, the previous day, revealing that Epstein planned to meet a British Government Minister in New York on the weekend of 12/13 December 2009. Image
Image
The Telegraph had picked up on a 2009 court application by Epstein to be released from house arrest so he could meet a senior British government figure in New York. Image
Read 9 tweets
Feb 4
Peter Mandelson is telling the truth on one thing: the idea he was bought for a $4k “bursary” or a $75k gift is ridiculous

The real incentive was a post-government payday - one so big he *rejected* a $3–5m-a-year offer

And Epstein enabled that payday

Here’s the evidence. 🧵 Image
The timeline is damning.

While still in office, Mandelson was warned by JPM’s Jes Staley (via Epstein) that sticking with Gordon Brown would be "bad form commercially".

Translation: It would hurt his future earning potential.

He got the message. Image
Just 48 hours after the government fell in May 2010, the "commercial" phase began.

Epstein immediately began brokering a role for Mandelson at Deutsche Bank.

("Petie" being Epstein's affectionate name for Mandelson) Image
Read 16 tweets
Feb 3
Epstein made $10k+ payments to Mandelson's partner around the time of the email leaks.

Mandelson says he thought the payments were bursaries from an educational foundation.

We're not allowed to say famous people are lying. But is Mandelson lying?

A 🧵 on the evidence: Image
The offer to help came from Epstein alone. No mention of a foundation/bursary. Image
Mandelson's partner sends payment details to Epstein personally. No sign of any foundation being involved. Image
Read 11 tweets
Feb 2
There's more.

On 31 March 2010, Lord Mandelson's principal private secretary sent him a note of a meeting between the Chancellor of the Exchequer and Larry Summers, US Treasury Secretary.

Lord Mandelson forwarded it to Jeffrey Epstein five minutes later. Image
Image
Image
This was a pretty detailed discussion. Epstein responded with suggestions as to how hedge funds should be taxed, and then detailed questions about the drafting of the new US rules ("may" vs "shall).
The next day, Lord Mandelson met Larry Summers himself.

Lord Mandelson's private secretary sent a note of the meeting to him at 1.22pm. Within two minutes, Lord Mandelson forwarded it to Jeffrey Epstein. Image
Read 7 tweets
Feb 2
Who leaked this Number 10 discussion to Jeffrey Epstein? And are there consequences for the leaker?

It’s an internal discussion re. getting markets moving in the aftermath of the financial crisis. No doubt of great interest to Epstein and his financial market clients. Image
The name of the leaker is redacted. Could be any of Vadera, Pond, Heywood, Mandelson, or anyone they forwarded the email to.

I guess we'll never know the leaker's identity.
On a completely different subject, here's Peter Mandelson (a few months later) leaking an unrelated policy discussion to Jeffrey Epstein. Image
Read 13 tweets
Feb 1
New Epstein emails show Peter Mandelson secretly advising JPMorgan’s CEO on how to fight Labour’s 2009 bankers’ bonus tax - even suggesting he “mildly threaten” the Chancellor.

Mandelson was Business Secretary at the time.

A year later, he was seeking work with JPM. Image
On 9 December 2009, Alistair Darling - then the Chancellor of the Exchequer - announced a one-off 50% tax on bankers’ bonuses. Image
On 15 December, Jeffrey Epstein asked Lord Mandelson if the tax could be amended so it applied only to cash bonuses (not the, much more valuable, non-cash elements such as share options).

Mandelson said that he was trying hard to amend the tax. Image
Image
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(