What if there was a consensus on the tax reforms the UK needs?
What if it was backed by policy experts from think tanks across the political spectrum, from the Adam Smith Institute to the Resolution Foundation?
The consensus is real. The question is: will anyone act on it?
Launching today is a series of proposals backed by the Adam Smith Institute, Bright Blue, CenTax, the Centre for Policy Studies, the Institute for Public Policy Research, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, the New Economics Foundation, Resolution Foundation, Tax Policy Associates.
Everyone in that list disagrees on the fundamental political question of the size and role of the state.
But we all agree on how the basics of how the tax system should work. The rate is up for debate - but that's the easy bit.
All the proposed reforms could be tax-neutral: not tax cuts, not tax increases. Tax reforms to make the system more rational and drive growth.
(Or executed as tax cuts or tax increases, per your political preference)
Here's the list:
1. Abolish stamp duty on land
2. Scrap VAT exemptions/zero rates and lower the main rate (whilst protecting vulnerable groups).
3. End the high marginal rates faced by people coming off universal credit, earning £60k ot earning £100k. Marginal rates of 60%+ are a disgrace.
4. Merge employer and employee NICs with Income Tax
5. Tax landlords fairly - on their actual net income, and at the same rate as labour income.
6. Reform capital gains tax so it taxes real gains actually accrued in the UK
7. Reform the corporation tax base. End the capital/income distinction. Provide "full expensing" for all investment. End the bias towards debt.
I can't recall anything like this happening before. In part a credit to @CPSThinkTank, @CenTaxUK, @ASI, @IPPR, @NEF, @jrf_uk, @WeAreBrightBlue, @LabourTogether.
But in part a sign of the dire state of the tax system.
@CPSThinkTank @CenTaxUK @ASI @IPPR @NEF @jrf_uk @WeAreBrightBlue @LabourTogether We're overdue a Budget which doesn't just scrabble around for new revenue, but delivers on pro-growth reform.
I hope this Government will step up and, if they don't, that others will.
Mandelson's firm, General Counsel, covered-up Mandelson's relationship with Epstein.
Here's Global Counsel's CEO and co-founder, preparing to tell the press that Mandelson barely knew Jeffrey Epstein.
Who did he check that line with?
Jeffrey Epstein.
They're responding to this Telegraph story, the previous day, revealing that Epstein planned to meet a British Government Minister in New York on the weekend of 12/13 December 2009.
The Telegraph had picked up on a 2009 court application by Epstein to be released from house arrest so he could meet a senior British government figure in New York.
On 31 March 2010, Lord Mandelson's principal private secretary sent him a note of a meeting between the Chancellor of the Exchequer and Larry Summers, US Treasury Secretary.
Lord Mandelson forwarded it to Jeffrey Epstein five minutes later.
This was a pretty detailed discussion. Epstein responded with suggestions as to how hedge funds should be taxed, and then detailed questions about the drafting of the new US rules ("may" vs "shall).
The next day, Lord Mandelson met Larry Summers himself.
Lord Mandelson's private secretary sent a note of the meeting to him at 1.22pm. Within two minutes, Lord Mandelson forwarded it to Jeffrey Epstein.
Who leaked this Number 10 discussion to Jeffrey Epstein? And are there consequences for the leaker?
It’s an internal discussion re. getting markets moving in the aftermath of the financial crisis. No doubt of great interest to Epstein and his financial market clients.
The name of the leaker is redacted. Could be any of Vadera, Pond, Heywood, Mandelson, or anyone they forwarded the email to.
I guess we'll never know the leaker's identity.
On a completely different subject, here's Peter Mandelson (a few months later) leaking an unrelated policy discussion to Jeffrey Epstein.
New Epstein emails show Peter Mandelson secretly advising JPMorgan’s CEO on how to fight Labour’s 2009 bankers’ bonus tax - even suggesting he “mildly threaten” the Chancellor.
Mandelson was Business Secretary at the time.
A year later, he was seeking work with JPM.
On 9 December 2009, Alistair Darling - then the Chancellor of the Exchequer - announced a one-off 50% tax on bankers’ bonuses.
On 15 December, Jeffrey Epstein asked Lord Mandelson if the tax could be amended so it applied only to cash bonuses (not the, much more valuable, non-cash elements such as share options).
Mandelson said that he was trying hard to amend the tax.