Alex גדעון בן װעלװל Profile picture
Nov 5 20 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Some sober thinking for New York Jews and those sympathetic to us on a Mamdani win, a thread.
1) Mamdani won in a historically high turnout election. He won 50.4% of that vote and 49.6% of votes cast were not for him.

He beat a sex pest he had already beaten in the Democratic primary and a crazy cat guy who knew he was not viable.

This dynamic is unlikely to repeat.
Many voters think solely in terms of the who won or lost binary, but the margin of victory matters. Ambitious politicians who did not run in the mayoral race are paying attention to the margin of victory. Barely eeking out a majority is not a strong deterrent.
2) Mamdani's campaign is over. The next job is actually governing, making choices, prioritizing some issues, not delivering on others.

That will, in the best case scenario for him, still peel away some voters from his coalition.
On housing, the ballot proposals appear to have passed. This, along with the city of yes initiative, will start to alleviate the housing shortage in New York. On their own I do not believe they will solve the problem of insufficient housing entirely.
To Jews Mamdani ran an alienating and bad faith campaign on our safety in New York and Israel issues. But to most people who voted for him the cost of living issues resonated more.
Mamdani's plans for housing, taxes, free bussing, etc... involve legislation passing in Albany, where he had no success passing things as a member of the state assembly

More broadly, there isn't real low hanging fruit on taxes or gov spending. New York already does a lot of both
Where Mamdani does have more influence is in upzoning (letting private developers build more) and taking on the other large factors in why building anything in New York is so expensive: entrenched unions.

I don't expect him to pull either of those levers.
3) Many New York Jews are angered and alienated that Democrats would nominate someone so hostile to our needs. I share that anger, but it's worth asking: how many of you voted in that primary? I did and I did not see nearly as many kippot in line as I did in the general.
The primary is where we fight. Our smaller numbers have bigger impact there. A win there makes a win in the fall more likely as the candidate has a D next to their name will get party endorsements and favorable media coverage for months ahead of the general.
That means not indulging your anger towards Democrats but making a tactical calculation to register as one and actually show up to vote in the primary for a candidate who cares that Jews are the number 1 victim of hate crimes and the number is rising every year.
4) I see a great deal of catastrophizing about Mamdani winning. I believe we will have problems, but I believe they will be more subtle than the histrionics I see.
We saw the rhetorical aspect of it in this election. Mamdani constantly demonizes Israel but says the safety of New York Jews is important to him. It's a good rhetorical tool for seeming reasonable to people who don't understand that anti-Israel incitement gets Jews beat here.
When Mamdani's most fanatical anti-Israel supporters call for "flooding Crown Heights" as they did earlier this year, will Mamdani proactively deploy the police against his base? I doubt it. He will do it reactively and opt to sound reasonable about how hate has no home here
To people who are not Jewish, the connection will simply never be made between this politics and our safety. He will *sound* reasonable. Which means we have to adopt more sophisticated tactics.
There is a governor of New York who is more sympathetic to our needs. She has her own re-election campaign next year. New York mayors and governors routinely have tense relationships, but Mamdani needs Hochul to help him with his legislative agenda. She can act as a constraint.
When Mamdani fails to be proactive about our security needs, the governor is who we can turn to.

The same governor who did security theater by deploying the national guard to the subway can do that for Jewish neighborhoods Mamdani is not proactively protecting.
All of which is to say Mamdani faces real constraints from the system, from his voters, from other politicians he needs to work with, and from those of us who do not trust him and are prepared to act when he fails to meet our needs.
We lost. It happens. You can cry about it or you can do something about it. I strongly urge you to do something about it. I will.
@threadreaderapp unroll

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alex גדעון בן װעלװל

Alex גדעון בן װעלװל Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JewishWonk

Oct 24
I keep seeing leftist comedians who have a Jewish parent out for Mamdani doing the "AsAJew" shtick to mock our concerns and be volunteer tokens for this man. A thread on why I have particular contempt for these people.
1) If the only time in your life being Jewish is relevant is to disparage other Jews and their concerns, you're not behaving as a member of our community. You are playing for someone else's team *at our expense.*
I am a Jew when it's not convenient. I am a Jew wearing a kippah on Shabbat and have Jew haters with keffiyehs on more than one occasion in 2025 feeling safe spitting at me in the streets. Orthodox Jews in Brooklyn are dealing with violence from these pricks, not just disrespect.
Read 12 tweets
Oct 2
An old Soviet Jewish joke and then a take:

A long line forms outside the Гастроном (a Soviet state-run grocery store) because word spread that they’ll have meat

Hours pass. A Communist Party official steps out: Comrades, there will not be enough meat for all.

Jews, go home.
The line shortens. Hours later the official returns:

“Comrades, do not believe the rumors. There is even less than we thought. Everyone who is not a party member or a pensioner may leave.”
More leave. By evening, the official comes out again:
“Comrades, there is no meat at all. Everyone should disperse.”

The last man in line, Kolka, mutters bitterly: “Typical. The fucking Jews got to leave first and we are left with nothing.”
Read 13 tweets
Aug 18
The thing I would like for those who fixate on destroying Israel to understand is that this idea is corrosive. Not for Israel, but for the people who hold it. Incoming thread. Image
1) It is not feasible. You can invoke apartheid South Africa all you want to insult Israel. That regime came down with the collaboration of the whites. They had no memory of genocide. No memory of mass expulsion. No memory of forcible assimilation.
Israel, by contrast, is nothing like South Africa or French Algeria or you name it. The country has no parallels on this planet. Nobody has gathered a global diaspora and revived a language. Nobody has faced annihilation so frequently and come back from the brink.
Read 13 tweets
Aug 11
There is a fierce argument happening in Israel and across the Jewish world on whether to continue the war in Gaza or cut a deal to get the hostages home and end the war. I'd like to explain why I am in the end the war camp. Thread.
1) The war that Hamas started when they invaded Israel on 10/7 to rape, murder, and kidnap Israelis saw Israel develop two overarching war goals:

-Return the hostages
-Destroy Hamas as a political and military org

These two goals are in tension.
2) Israeli security leaders increasingly assess the two goals are not achievable at the same time. More explicitly, the ones who have retired and can speak freely say there is no more to achieve with warfare and that a deal is necessary.
timesofisrael.com/on-the-precipi…
Read 30 tweets
Aug 4
The interests and constraints preventing a conclusion of the war in Gaza, a thread.
1) Hamas still has hostages they kidnapped on 10/7.

Every day they remain captive, Hamas keeps leverage. It stalls ceasefire talks, splits Israel’s war cabinet and society, and keeps the war alive. The longer they hold them, the more volatile Israeli politics becomes.
2) Hamas planned a media strategy, not a viable military way to win against Israel.

Their goal was to provoke a massive Israeli response. They wanted to ignite the region, collapse normalization deals, and position themselves as the political leaders of the Palestinian cause.
Read 10 tweets
Jul 29
Some thoughts on the French initiative to recognize a Palestinian state, the UK's threats to join, and the second order effects of this.
1) We see headlines along the lines of "France to recognize Palestine." Their diplomacy is actually more ambitious. They are lobbying for coordinated EU or international recognition, aiming to give diplomatic weight to the idea of a Palestinian state even as war continues in Gaza
2) The French initiative is not particularly realistic if taken at face value. It doesn’t create borders, unify Palestinian leadership, or disarm Hamas

It bypasses a core problem: there is no functioning Palestinian state and no Palestinian consensus on what one would look like
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(