🚨 BREAKING: State lawmakers in New Mexico are pushing to create a “truth commission” to investigate alleged crimes at Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch —nearly seven years after Jeffrey Epstein’s death and despite the property having been sold.
🧵 1
The ranch (a sprawling, remote estate once owned by Epstein in Santa Fe County) was sold in 2023 by his estate as part of a “fire sale.”
2
Lawmakers, led by Rep. Andrea Romero (D-Santa Fe), say survivors signalled abuse and trafficking activity at the ranch and that the state still lacks a full record of “what occurred or how officials responded.”
3
Proposed budget: $2.5 million for the commission to dig in.
4
So why now? Why only after the ranch was sold and many years after allegations surfaced? Why hasn’t this been done earlier when survivors first raised alarms? Many of the brave women who have spoken up about their experiences identified the ranch as a location of their abuse.
5
If we’re serious about truth and accountability, it’s not just about investigating the ranch 7 years later.
Survivors deserve for there to be a commission established including lawmakers, citizens and trauma professionals to review the full release the full Epstein files.
No more sealed documents, no more protected names, no more redactions in the name of ‘privacy’ while the public is kept in the dark.
Epstein purchased Zorro Ranch in 1993, reportedly for around $12 million, from the former New Mexico Governor Bruce King.
Epstein’s private pilot Larry Visoski (shown here arriving to court) has faced no charges in the trafficking operation, despite piloting thousands of flights—some with Epstein’s victims aboard.
He was gifted a 40 acre ranch of his own, originally part of Zorro Ranch, by Epstein.
Larry’s daughter was married at the ranch a few years ago
To support my reader-funded work subscribe here and at my substack (link in bio) for deeper dives. Or you can share my posts, tip or buy me a coffee at cashapp $AWSInvestigates or below
“We believe that this ranch was used by Epstein and others to facilitate the commission and prolonged concealment of his trafficking of children,” Clara Moran, the former chief deputy attorney general who’s now a district judge, wrote in a 2020 letter to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in New York City.
“I ask that any interests belonging to Epstein’s estate or co-conspirators be seized by federal authorities.”
So why now?
In a 2022 email about an investigation into Ghislaine Maxwell, one of the attorney general’s special agents wrote: “Several years ago, we began looking into this case and were asked to stop by DOJ as the FBI was investigating and they were prosecuting in NY.”
🚨UPDATE
A federal judge in the James Comey case said newly-appointed prosecutor Lindsey Halligan must turn over a full transcript of grand jury indictment proceedings, including her own statements.
1
This comes after Comey moved to dismiss the case, arguing selective/vindictive prosecution and claiming the prosecutor, Lindsey Halligan, was unlawfully appointed.
2
James Comey was indicted in late September on charges of making false statements and obstructing a congressional proceeding. He has pleaded not guilty.
His legal team argues the case is political retaliation from President Donald Trump.
Comey’s team argues Halligan, a former personal Trump attorney, was improperly installed as interim U.S. Attorney after Erik Siebert resigned under White House pressure and therefore the indictment is invalid.
🚨 BREAKING:
There was an active federal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s alleged co-conspirators all the way until September 2025 — and then it abruptly stopped.
Now a Maryland lawmaker, Rep. Jamie Raskin, is demanding answers from the DOJ about who shut it down and why.
1
Raskin sent a formal letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi asking why the DOJ ended the probe after survivors, prosecutors, and FBI agents spent years building it, only to have it suddenly transferred to DOJ headquarters and halted.
Photo of Raskin
2
In his words:
“Why has the DOJ abandoned the women and girls abused by Mr. Epstein, Ms. Maxwell, and their co-conspirators… and ceased its investigation into one of the largest sex trafficking rings in history?”
🚨 BREAKING
Confirmed what I called out yesterday when I exposed “journalist” Jay Beecher for smearing Virginia Giuffre.
He was paid to do it. 🔥 I will find them all and call them out. For survivors. ✊🏼🖤
A thread
According to The Times, Beecher was paid £80,000, funded by Brian Basham (Ghislaine Maxwell’s PR ally) to help create a book aimed at discrediting Virginia.
Not my image but from right: Ghislaine Maxwell, Brian Basham, Virginia Giuffre and the man formerly known as Prince Andrew
“It’s a terrible thing that’s happened to the family… I feel badly for them.”
President Donald Trump expressed sympathy not for survivors and victims of Epstein, but for King Charles and the British royal family as they try to contain the fallout from Andrew’s ties to Jeffrey Epstein.
Photo not my own, taken during reporter questions
1
His comments came just days after King Charles took decisive action and stripped Andrew of his royal title and removed him from official royal duties.
2
Why now? The pressure. The royals have long known about the allegations from Virginia Giuffre about Andrew. They knew a young woman claimed he had sexually abused her and that she was trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell.
Still, it took newly uncovered emails showing Andrew tried to “catch up” with Epstein only months after Epstein was released from prison.
And it took Virginia speaking up one final time (her memoir was punished after her death earlier this year.)
Stripping a Prince of his title is not justice — it’s PR.
Call him Andrew whatever you want now.
I’m more interested in hearing: “The investigation is now criminal.”
1
Andrew kept his title through lawsuits, flight logs and settlements.
Only after the Queen died—after Virginia died—and her memoir hit the world, did the Palace act.
They knew. They waited. They chose silence over justice.
2
When Virginia first accused Prince Andrew, the response wasn’t investigation.
Instead, it was denial and victim character assassination. The Palace issued statements defending him.
British tabloids smeared her endlessly, calling her “money-seeking” and “fantasist.” There are still bot farms that attempt to smear her name anytime I post about this.
Perhaps they are more concerned about protecting the institution than justice for survivors.
Rep Thomas Massie is on the right track asking where the $1b from Epstein’s account went to after his death.
The answer: it didn’t disappear by accident. It was moved by design.
2
Two days before he was found dead, Epstein quietly signed a will.
In it, he transferred more than $577 million of his known assets into a secretive trust in the Virgin Islands called “The 1953 Trust.”
Why does that matter? Because trusts make assets harder for victims to reach, and it continues to pay people in Epstein’s network, even today.
3
The rest (an amount totaling over $1 billion in “suspicious transactions” flagged by JPMorgan) was already sitting in shell companies, offshore accounts, private LLCs and bank structures built to shield money from public view. It was a series of strategic moves by Epstein and his accountants and lawyers that made $1b “disappear.”