The RSF's El Fasher massacre has killed thousands and famine threatens the lives of millions
Here is a layout of how we got to this point and why the West deserves much of the blame /THREAD
Western policy towards Sudan has been characterized by contradictions and incoherence
Intense engagement followed by disinterest, shifting attitudes towards perpetrators of violence/genocide and a tendency of abandoning the country when it needed support most /1
The story starts during the Cold War
The US was looking for additional bulwarks against communism to complement its robust foothold in Zaire and forays into the Horn of Africa (Somalia/Ethiopia in alternation) /2
Nimeiry faced a pro-Soviet coup in 1971 and became a convenient partner for the US
The US propped up his military dictatorship and Sudan became the largest aid destination in Africa (even as Jimmy Carter administration clashed with Congress on Zaire aid) /3
Nimeiry revelled in the assistance but flipped on the US by the early 1980s and became a partner with Libyan dictator Muammar al-Gaddafi
The US withdrew support for Sudan and Omar al-Bashir seized power in 1989 /4
Bashir's solidarity with Saddam Hussein during the 1990 Iraqi invasion of Kuwait and harboring of Osama Bin Laden caused the US to pivot to isolating Sudan
Economically crippling terrorism sanctions and aligments with anti-regime militias followed /5
Regime change was not achieved and Sudan merely pivoted towards Russian arms and Chinese investment
The US lightened up on Bashir when he became a War on Terror partner after 9/11 and spurred by Bush's evangelical allies, promoted peace in Sudan in 2005 /6
Once peace was achieved, the West took its feet off the gas
South Sudan seceded with oil resource competitions flaring and Libya descended into instability after a NATO intervention (this gave the RSF local allies in eastern Libya). But the West did not act /7
In fact, the West outsourcing policy towards Sudan to its Middle East partners (this is a common view amongst Sudanese civil society)
Bashir thawed relations with Turkey, Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Qatar as he broke with Iran and this propped up his regime until 2019 /8
In April 2019, mass protests and a military coup threw Bashir out of power
The West had an opportunity to fully support Sudan's civilian transition, swiftly lift sanctions and stem further turmoil but it dithered and offered half-hearted transition frameworks /9
This gave the Sudanese military structural edges and the Burhan/Hemedti rift caused external powers to align along this fault-line
Burhan got backing from Egypt and Saudi Arabia, Hemedti from Prigozhin in Russia and the UAE /10
This staged the path for a coup in October 2021 which emboldened both generals further
They got assurances of support from their external backers and were confident that they could win swiftly in an all-out war
This false confidence ignited the April 2023 war /11
While the US and Saudi Arabia rushed to push for peace, the foundations behind these efforts were hollow
Inadequate sanctions on the illicit gold trade that powered Hemedti and no new strategy in Libya or CAR or backing of democratic forces /12
To many Sudanese, Molly Phee became a symbol of a US policy that gave too much legitimacy and leeway to autocrats and shunned Sudanese civil society
This ensured that the proxy war in Sudan played out and a resolution to the conflict became impossible /13
USAID's gutting destroyed 80% of Sudan's emergency food kitchens and Britain's aid cuts prevented an efficient response to Sudan's catastrophe in El Fasher (even as intelligence warned of an imminent massacre)
A tragic chain of events that brought us to where we are today /14
Now is the time for urgent diplomacy, humanitarian aid and punishments of the enablers of this war
One has to hope that the external powers that fuel conflict in Sudan belatedly use their leverage to become peacemakers /END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Kazakhstan has officially joined the Abraham Accords
Here's the context behind that move and what it means /THREAD
Kazakhstan and Israel already have established ties, they date back to the immediate aftermath of the Soviet Union's collapse (1992 to be precise)
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu already visited Kazakhstan in 2016 /1
Kazakhstan has also maintained an equi-distant policy in the Gaza War and the prevailing view from journalistic pieces/research on Kazakh society is that it wants to be insulated from Middle East developments
So engagement with Israel is par for the course /2
A ceasefire has taken hold in Gaza and Israeli hostages are about to be released
Here's an overview of what will likely come next /THREAD
The ceasefire was driven by two key factors
The first was that Hamas saw no chance of outlasting Israel's military resolve and surviving as a governing power in the pre-2023 form
The second was that Israel also realized the complete annhiliation of Hamas was unachievable /1
Pressure on Israel from the US was also mounting
During my recent trip to Washington, Democrats framed Israel's war as a Netanyahu regime survival mission and Republicans were quizzical about whether Israel was trading short-term wins for long-term insecurity /2
Armenia and Azerbaijan have struck a peace agreement
There are still numerous unsettled issues but its a major geopolitical sea change
Here's what's likely to come next /1
The US's brokering of the Armenia-Azerbaijan final settlement deals a significant blow to Russia, Iran and Europe's status
Russia wanted the 3+3 format including itself, Iran and Turkey as well as Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia to achieve a breakthrough /2
The problem was that Russia was regarded as a power that was stoking the conflict to maximize its leverage
Selling arms to both sides before the 2020 war and there was widespread skepticism in Azerbaijan about the hegemonic intentions of Russian peacekeepers /3
This is the debate in Washington right now after Trump's pivot against Russia
In this thread, I break down what economic measures will work and won't work against Russia /THREAD
Trump's secondary tariffs against Russia are unlikely to be enforceable without escalating a trade war with China, torpedoing UAE investments and derailing a trade deal with India
Its not a viable approach even though if implemented to max, they would be devastating /1
Instead, the focus needs to be on closing key loopholes in the sanctions regime
While significant progress has been made against banks like Sberbank and Gazprombank, they are not the only front against Russia's SWIFT access
The Russia-China-Iran-North Korea authoritarian axis has been widely discussed since 2022
It has functioned effectively in Ukraine but flopped spectacularly in the Israel-Iran war
Some more details on what this means /THREAD
This authoritarian axis has often been framed as a bloc that is presenting a normative/geopolitical challenge to US hegemony and the Western liberal order
The 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine crystallized as the West isolated Russia, these powers backed Russian aggression /1
This framing is problematic for several reasons
First, these bilateral relationships were not created due to a changing world order
They formed during the Cold War, 1980s and 1990s /2
The US has launched major military strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities
Here are some thoughts on what might come next /THREAD
The US escalation reflects a middle ground between the two camps within the Trump orbit
It is an escalation that goes beyond what the voices of de-escalation (Carlson, Bannon, Gabbard) wanted but is short of the regime change war that the hawks (Graham, Cotton) likely want /1
The Trump admin views the US attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities as a bargaining chip to facilitate new negotiations with Iran being in a position of grave weakness
A delayed Iranian retaliation that targets Israel only and not US bases in a major way supports this /2