Brad Setser Profile picture
Nov 12, 2025 19 tweets 6 min read Read on X
The old exportweltmeister has been dethroned -- and its economy is suffering at the hand of the new exportweltmeister (China).

That is the story told by both a new ECB paper and the FT in an excellent new piece

1/ Image
Put simply, Germany is the most exposed large G-7 economy to the second China shock (Japan has been buffered by an incredibly weak yen).

2/ Image
The impact of the second China shock is in all the relevant data sets -- & it reflects a clear Chinese policy choice: “As a country, the Chinese have been in the last years much better, more proactive, more consistent in going after the big technologies and conquering them”

3/
Germany's industrial economy has been in a 6 year slump, which corresponds well with China's pivot during the pandemic from an investment driven toan export driven economy

4/ Image
That corresponds with a swing in the euro area's trade with China -- falling exports (absolutely and relative to EA GDP,), a rising bilateral deficit that corresponds with a falling global surplus once Irish tax distortions are stripped out

5/ Image
The FT highlights the swing in Germany's capital goods balance with China -- an important point. The euro area's overall auto balance with China has also swung ...

6/ Image
Germany of course was the one major economy that really relied on exports to China from 2008 to 2018 -- so it is simply more exposed to the second China shock. Exports to China and HK are down a full p. point of German GDP

7/ Image
And German auto exports to China are on a trajectory that takes them to zero ... or at least back to the levels last seen when China was still quite poor

8/ Image
As an aside, auto imports are now down to about 2% of China's auto market (lots of import substitution) while China's exports are least 15% of non-Chinese auto demand globally if the closed US market is excluded (7m v 45m market)

9/
The FT story focuses on what Germany itself needs to do to respond to the new China shock (defense spending alone won't quite cut it, the internal EU market needs to be reinforced with a less "naive" / VW driven trade policy)

10/

ft.com/content/239eed…
The ECB's paper highlights the global dimension to Germany's industrial angst -- by highlighting how China's internal imbalances have fueled its export surplus (in a much clearer way than the IMF has ... )

11/

ecb.europa.eu/press/economic…
The ECB paper uses China's goods trade data (memo to the IMF, you cannot just use China's self reported current account numbers any more) to show that export growth and import growth have diverged, bigly

12/ Image
That divergence maps well to the real depreciation of the Chinese yuan by the way -- Germany cannot afford to ignore currency issues any more (incidentally, the ECB paper largely ignored this, which is my only real criticism of a v good piece)

13/ Image
Europe incidentally has not been rewarded for its relatively restraint (compared to the US) on trade protection -- China's imports from the EU have fallen by as much China's imports from the US since the pandemic (v trend)

14 Image
The ECB paper also highlights something that is obvious in the data but that neither the IMF nor the WTO has been able to state clearly, namely that China is the deglobalizer in chief (import growth has massively lagged GDP growth)

15/ Image
And the ECB finds that China's exports are outperforming the domestic economy across the board -- but especially in sectors where the domestic side of the Chinese economy is weak ...

16/ Image
The ECB's paper more than justifies France's plan to make the return of global imbalances a focus on its G-7 Presidency next year

17/

ecb.europa.eu/press/economic…
And the FT's Big Read should raise questions at the IMF about whether or not Germany is really still a big contributor to global imbalances (exports are falling, and domestic spending is set to increase) let alone a bigger contributor than China

18/

ft.com/content/239eed…
And it also should raise questions about the IMF's advice to China over the last 2 or 3 years, which more or less was to export your way out of the property crash more aggressively (monetary easing & long-term fiscal consolidation = weaker CNY). More later

19/19

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Brad Setser

Brad Setser Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Brad_Setser

Feb 3
The Treasury has indicated that it will look at the activities of China's state banks in its next assessment of China's currency policies--

It is hard to see how this doesn't become a bit of an issue ... unless of course summitry gets in the way of analysis 1/ Image
It is quite clear that state bank purchases (and in 23/ early 24 sales) of fx have replaced PBOC purchases and sales and the core technique China uses to manage the band around the daily fx -- i.e. settlement looks like an intervention variable

2/ Image
My latest blog looks both at how fx settlement (a measure that includes the state banks) has displaced the PBOC's own reported reserves as the best metric for Chinese intervention & lat some of SAFE's balance sheet mysteries

3/

cfr.org/articles/the-p…
Read 10 tweets
Feb 3
A new blog on China's hidden fx intervention, which reached staggering scale in December 2025

1/

cfr.org/articles/the-p…
The blog is detailed and technical -- and thus probably best read by those with a real interest in central bank balance sheets, the balance of payments and how to assess backdoor foreign currency intervention

2/ Image
Drawing on historical data, I propose that the gap between fx settlement and the foreign assets on the PBOC's balance sheet (fx reserves + other f. assets) is a good indicator of hidden intervention --

3/ Image
Read 10 tweets
Jan 30
Obviously overshadowed by the news about a Fed nomination, but the Treasury released its delated October 2025 FX report today and it is worth reading -- not the least b/c of a clear warning to SAFE.

1/ Image
This seems clear

"An economy that fails to publish intervention data or whose data are incomplete will not be given any benefit of the doubt in Treasury’s assessment of intervention practices."

2/

home.treasury.gov/news/press-rel…
This report only covers the period between July 24 and June 25, so it misses the bulk of the 2025 surge in fx settlement (December = $100b plus). But this chart suggests the use of more sophisticated analytical techniques than those used in past reports --

3/ Image
Read 21 tweets
Jan 27
Can a country artificially weaken its currency by changing how it regulates its life insurance industry?

I think the answer is yes.

A new blog, one certain to increase my popularity with the Central Bank of China (Taipei)

1/

cfr.org/articles/taiwa…
A bit of background. Taiwan's lifers hold $700 billion in foreign currency assets abroad (more counting their holdings of local ETFs that invest heavily in foreign bonds) v ~ $200 billion in domestic fx policies -- so fx gap (pre hedging) of $500 billion

2/ Image
Taiwan's regulator (perhaps the most complicit regulator on earth) not allows the lifers NOT to mark their fx holdings to the fx market -- so the lifers are incentivized not to hedge (and they are rapidly reducing their hedge ratio)

3/ Image
Read 13 tweets
Jan 26
Japan is an interesting case in a lot of ways. It has a ton of domestic debt (and significant domestic financial assets) which generates heated concerns about its solvency/ ability to manage higher rates. But it is also a massive global creditor --

1/ Image
Japan's net holdings of bonds (net of foreign holdings of JGBs) is close to 50% of its GDP (a creditor position as big v GDP as the US net det position). That includes $1 trillion in bonds held in Japan's $1.175 trillion in reserves, + over $2 trillion in other holdings

2/ Image
That translates into big holdings of US debt -- the MoF's Treasuries all show up in the US TIC data, but the corporate bonds held by the lifers, postbank and the GPIF are only partially captured in the US data b/c of third party management/ the use of EU custodians

3/ Image
Read 14 tweets
Jan 23
More pressure to export?

Monthly exports of passenger cars increased from a 6m cars a year pace to 10m car a year pace over the course of 2025 ...

Project that would at exports will reach 14m cars at the end of next year! Image
14m cars would be roughly 1/4th of the global market for cars outside China (the Chinese market is ~ 25m cars) ... no way that doesn't have a disruptive impact.

China would go from 6 to 14m cars in a two year period if 2025 isn't an outlier ...

2/
Not clear that German/ European politics can caught up to the scale of China's export tsunami. And some European firms think they can profit from China's subsidies and strong local supply chain by producing in China for the European market

3/

ft.com/content/02a52b…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(