The old exportweltmeister has been dethroned -- and its economy is suffering at the hand of the new exportweltmeister (China).
That is the story told by both a new ECB paper and the FT in an excellent new piece
1/
Put simply, Germany is the most exposed large G-7 economy to the second China shock (Japan has been buffered by an incredibly weak yen).
2/
The impact of the second China shock is in all the relevant data sets -- & it reflects a clear Chinese policy choice: “As a country, the Chinese have been in the last years much better, more proactive, more consistent in going after the big technologies and conquering them”
3/
Germany's industrial economy has been in a 6 year slump, which corresponds well with China's pivot during the pandemic from an investment driven toan export driven economy
4/
That corresponds with a swing in the euro area's trade with China -- falling exports (absolutely and relative to EA GDP,), a rising bilateral deficit that corresponds with a falling global surplus once Irish tax distortions are stripped out
5/
The FT highlights the swing in Germany's capital goods balance with China -- an important point. The euro area's overall auto balance with China has also swung ...
6/
Germany of course was the one major economy that really relied on exports to China from 2008 to 2018 -- so it is simply more exposed to the second China shock. Exports to China and HK are down a full p. point of German GDP
7/
And German auto exports to China are on a trajectory that takes them to zero ... or at least back to the levels last seen when China was still quite poor
8/
As an aside, auto imports are now down to about 2% of China's auto market (lots of import substitution) while China's exports are least 15% of non-Chinese auto demand globally if the closed US market is excluded (7m v 45m market)
9/
The FT story focuses on what Germany itself needs to do to respond to the new China shock (defense spending alone won't quite cut it, the internal EU market needs to be reinforced with a less "naive" / VW driven trade policy)
The ECB's paper highlights the global dimension to Germany's industrial angst -- by highlighting how China's internal imbalances have fueled its export surplus (in a much clearer way than the IMF has ... )
The ECB paper uses China's goods trade data (memo to the IMF, you cannot just use China's self reported current account numbers any more) to show that export growth and import growth have diverged, bigly
12/
That divergence maps well to the real depreciation of the Chinese yuan by the way -- Germany cannot afford to ignore currency issues any more (incidentally, the ECB paper largely ignored this, which is my only real criticism of a v good piece)
13/
Europe incidentally has not been rewarded for its relatively restraint (compared to the US) on trade protection -- China's imports from the EU have fallen by as much China's imports from the US since the pandemic (v trend)
14
The ECB paper also highlights something that is obvious in the data but that neither the IMF nor the WTO has been able to state clearly, namely that China is the deglobalizer in chief (import growth has massively lagged GDP growth)
15/
And the ECB finds that China's exports are outperforming the domestic economy across the board -- but especially in sectors where the domestic side of the Chinese economy is weak ...
16/
The ECB's paper more than justifies France's plan to make the return of global imbalances a focus on its G-7 Presidency next year
And the FT's Big Read should raise questions at the IMF about whether or not Germany is really still a big contributor to global imbalances (exports are falling, and domestic spending is set to increase) let alone a bigger contributor than China
And it also should raise questions about the IMF's advice to China over the last 2 or 3 years, which more or less was to export your way out of the property crash more aggressively (monetary easing & long-term fiscal consolidation = weaker CNY). More later
19/19
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Germany needs to fully wake up (it is happening but too slowly)
China's auto export growth did not slow in October.
825K vehicle exports (an annualized pace of close to 10m), likely over 700K passenger car exports (8.5m annualized). Crazy numbers
1/
Overall export growth slowed in October, but auto exports were surprisingly strong (2024 forecasts that China's export book was set to fizzle out haven't been born out, export growth actually reaccelerated)
The vehicle surplus now exceeds $100b
2/
The acceleration in exports is clearest in volume terms, but it shows in dollar terms as well -- and imports are being pushed out of the Chinese market (auto imports are now less than 2% of Chinese domestic sales ... )
The first relatively weak Chinese trade data release in a while -- October is usually down v September, but y/y growth in exports and imports also stalled. If October is a leading indicator for q4, the goods surplus will stabilize at (gulp) around $1.2 trillion
1/
There is a standard seasonal fall in export in October tied to the mid-autumn festival -- and that dip may be a bit pronounced this October. But y/y volume growth looks close to flat (after a surprisingly strong 11-12% increase in Sept)
2/
Averaging the monthly data (October is an estimate) would suggest export volumes are growing ~ 5% -- still faster than global trade, but a deceleration from most of 2024 and the first part of 2025
Somehow, the US has ended up with a tariff structure for many goods that doesn't really encourage a shift in production out of China. Quote is from Sean Stein of the US-China Business Council, in a new piece from @AnaSwanson
To be sure, the legacy 25% 301 tariff on lists 1-3 does discourage final assembly of those goods in China -- but the term 2 tariffs haven't added to that penalty ...
The bulk of current US imports from China have a 301 tariff of either 7.5% (many household/ consumer goods) or zero (electronics) and now face a 20% tariff (10 reciprocal, 10 fentanyl) -- which isn't much different from the 19 or 20% tariff on SE Asia.
3/
Jason Douglass and Jonathan Cheng in the WSJ -- the Trade War Didn't Change China.
In fact, China's economy is more unbalanced and more reliant on exports for the demand than it was when section 301 case first started
1/
Open trade failed, spectacularly, to liberalize China's political system.
More restricted trade if anything led China to double down on its manufacturing intensive, channel capital to industry model
2/
I think it is fair to say that China has weaponized the chokepoints generated by its control over the supply of critical inputs (rare earths, magnets, legacy chips, processing of chips) quite effectively --
China's goods and services data on a balance of payments basis is now effectively out for q3 (with the September monthly data) -- and on a balance of payments basis, exports jumped up a bit in q3
1/
The q2 surplus using China's (whacky) BoP methodology was well below the q2 customs surplus -- but the q3 BoP surplus is strong, and up v q2 (while the customs surplus is down)
2/
So my estimate for the q3 current account surplus is just over $200b ($800b annualized) -- or well above q2 ...
There needs to be a better consensus number for the tariff on China. The effective tariff rate (Tariff paid/ imports) was 37-38% in July and August. It should fall to under 30% with the recent deal.
As @EtraAlex notes, that is still higher than the effective tariff rate on most other countries (India is a bit of an outlier, but there should be a deal) -- the electronics exclusion lowers the effective tariff on SE Asia ...
2/
There of course is a lot of sectoral variability in the tariffs -- all sorts of 232s that knock out the reciprocal tariffs, and in some cases (electronics/ chips & pharma) that has really lowered the actual applied tariff (same for the USMCA exclusion)
3/