HoCStaffer Profile picture
Nov 13 10 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Well folks, look like mockery worked.

2 days later the Liberals are backing away from this ill planned & poorly designed scheme. 🧵 Image
Currently 4,384 ppl in Supp. Reserve.

Govt would increase to 300,000 w/ no plan. 😂 Image
Next year I guess we should be honouring bureaucrats on Remembrance Day? Image
Chief of Defence Staff:

our plan didn't prioritize civil servants.

Chief of Defence Staff's plan:

prioritize civil servants

🤦‍♀️ Image
The actual reserves was to jump from 23, 561 to 100,000 under the plan.

And by plan I mean pixies and fairy dust. Image
Here's the plan:

400,000 total Canadians in Reserves & Supplementary Reserves.

Ok. How do you get that number? How much will this cost? How long will it take?

🦗 Image
Oh, & we'll consult with Finland.

Finland? The country with mandatory male conscription? Image
Oh! And last but not least, planning began in June on this near-boondoggle bureaucrat army recruitment scheme.

No announcement. No mention in the campaign. No budget.

This was so poorly planned & delivered you'd think it was still Trudeau in charge. Image
Here's the full read: ottawacitizen.com/public-service…
I can't remember the last time a half baked govt idea was backtracked so quickly.

But I guess a combo of total public mockery combined with probably tons of bureaucrats in the defence minister's riding complaining about it led to a phone call from the min's office to DND telling the CDS to wear this.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with HoCStaffer

HoCStaffer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @HoCStaffer

Nov 10
Must be one of the funniest headlines I have ever read. And not the @TheBabylonBee either. Image
"Entry standards wouldn't be strict."
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

I'm lol'ing in my office. Image
A "tiger team." 🤣 Image
Read 5 tweets
Aug 5
Immigration in Canada.

Who wants to talk about it?

Conservatives do. In fact they have a 2-hour meeting today to clarify policy on it.

Since about half of the CPC Caucus follows me on here, it's a good place to drop your comments on Canada's immigration policy.

I'll start👇
Everyone knows it's an issue, but there are disagreements in Caucus about how strong a stance needs to be taken.

Today's meeting may do it, or there may be more to come. Everyone needs to sing off the same hymn sheet.

It will take work.

Provinces - even regions and cities in the same province - are really different when it comes to immigration needs or lack thereof.
Just one such example: high seasonal tourism areas rely on TFWs. Often the local real estate market is geared towards second homes & rentals. There isn't affordable real estate for actual Canadians to live and work there with hospitality wages.

Agricultural areas - especially fruit and vegetables - suffer from a need for massive numbers of pickers for like a month or two. That's all. Sometimes it can be locals, but the picking season corresponds usually with the school year. Not entirely feasible to do it only with locals.
Read 13 tweets
Jun 25
Correspondence to an MP.

Just want to highlight a few things & give some clarity to folks about it.

I welcome feedback & happy to try to answer any questions folks have about day-to-day life on the Hill.

Small 🧵 on sending emails to MPs👇

First point about correspondence:

1) If you're not from the riding we don't care.Image
Now, that's not to say your issue is not important, but MPs can get hundreds of emails a day. Some original, many automated ones.

They - or more specifically their staff - have more than enough to do without answering messages from outside the riding.

Fun fact: MPs are answerable to their constituents, not ALL Canadians.
2) The actual MP almost never answers your email.

Occasionally if they know the person or it's a quick "hey MP, I'm happy you voted this way," the MP may send a quick reply. But 99+% of the time it is staff sending the email.

Oh? Your reply was signed by the MP?

Lol. No it wasn't. Staff have access to the "MP" accounts and send emails on the MP's behalf with the MP's signature.

(All MPs have their own private parl accounts which are not public for important correspondence)
Read 16 tweets
Jun 4
Ever wonder why an MP doesn't just create a Bill for something?

Or did you see a loopy Bill and worry it may get passed?

Well, the "Results of the draw for Private Members’ Business" should interest you then.

This not-so-exciting sentence actually plays an important role in determining which Private Members' Bills make it to a vote.

It's a pretty misunderstood part of the parliamentary process, so here is a small (& somewhat nerdy & procedural)🧵 for you:
I see a lot of stuff online where people freak out over some Bill (like guaranteed annual income) because they 1) don't understand the difference between Government and Private Members' Bills (PMB) and/or they don't understand the PMB process.
Before we tackle PMBs, let's get Government Bills out of the way.

Government Bills start with C-1 (Commons-1) and go from there.

They went as high as C-79 in the last Parliament.

These Bills are put forward by the government and have the full weight of the government behind them.

They also get the most debate time in the House.

They are for your standard things like the budget, changes to laws etc.

60 of them passed in the last Parliament.
Read 11 tweets
Apr 21
🚨Absolutely SHOCKING report quietly released by the Government in January which predicts what Canada may look like in 15 years.🚨

A must read!

I've seen some references to it on here, but no summaries of the whole report. I decided to dig a little deeper. 🧵👇 Image
First things first, thanks to @hollyanndoan of Blacklock's Reporter for bringing it to the public's attention. It's how I discovered it.
The document was released by Policy Horizons, which is a bit of an internal Think Tank for the gov't. Image
Read 27 tweets
Apr 17
Alright folks.

🚨Here it is!🚨

Finally found some time to review all the messages and do some checking on the Do You Believe the Polls sweater people.

I'm still missing some pieces, so feel free to comment or DM me. I will keep it anonymous.

Here we go 🧵👇 Image
First of all, the man and woman on the right are Paul and Shara Micucci. They are husband & wife and are the Chair and the Founder of the Meadowvale Business Association (MBA) in Mississauga. Some others have some resemblance to others in Association photos, but I can't be as certain.Image
Paul and Shara (and much of the MBA) have a close relationship with Doug Ford and the Progressive Conservative Party of Ontario (PCPO). Image
Image
Read 22 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(