RESEARCH PHASE PROMPTS
FINANCIAL TOPIC FOUNDATION PROMPT
Create a comprehensive research foundation for [FINANCIAL TOPIC/STRATEGY/CRISIS] structured for 2-3 hour deep exploration:
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK:
Core financial principles and concepts involved
Economic theory underpinning the topic
Mathematical models and formulas (with intuitive explanations)
Historical development of these financial concepts
Academic vs. practical perspectives on the topic
Competing schools of thought (Keynesian, Austrian, Chicago School, etc.)
EMPIRICAL DATA COMPILATION:
Historical performance data and statistics
Market data across different time periods and conditions
Comparative analysis across markets/countries
Backtesting results and methodology
Real-world case studies with documented outcomes
Peer-reviewed research findings and meta-analyses
REGULATORY AND LEGAL LANDSCAPE:
Current regulatory framework affecting the topic
Historical regulatory changes and their impacts
Geographic variations in regulation
Legal precedents and court cases
Compliance requirements and considerations
Pending legislative changes and their potential effects
MARKET MECHANICS:
How specific markets or instruments function
Key players and their roles (institutions, retail, regulators)
Price discovery mechanisms
Liquidity considerations and constraints
Transaction costs and practical frictions
Market microstructure relevant to topic
RISK ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK:
Specific risks associated with the topic
Historical risk manifestations and outcomes
Risk measurement methodologies
Risk mitigation strategies and their effectiveness
Tail risks and black swan considerations
Behavioral risks and psychological factors
PRACTICAL IMPLEMENTATION:
Step-by-step execution requirements
Technology and platforms needed
Cost structures and fee considerations
Tax implications (with jurisdiction notes)
Time commitments and skill requirements
Common implementation mistakes and solutions
Focus on verifiable data from reputable sources: academic journals, regulatory filings, established financial institutions, and recognized financial data providers. Clearly distinguish between theoretical models and practical reality.
FINANCIAL CRISIS/EVENT DEEP RESEARCH PROMPT
Develop comprehensive analysis of [FINANCIAL CRISIS/EVENT] suitable for 2-3 hour narrative exploration:
PRE-CRISIS CONDITIONS:
Economic environment leading to event (5-10 years prior)
Monetary policy stance and interest rate environment
Credit conditions and lending standards
Asset valuations and bubble indicators
Regulatory framework and enforcement
Warning signs identified (or missed) by analysts
KEY PLAYERS DOCUMENTATION:
Central banks and their decision-makers
Government officials and regulators
Major financial institutions involved
Individual traders or executives central to events
Victims and those affected by crisis
Whistleblowers or early warning voices
CRISIS MECHANICS:
Exact sequence of events with precise timeline
Triggering event(s) and initial market reactions
Contagion mechanisms and transmission channels
Liquidity dynamics and funding stresses
Feedback loops and accelerating factors
Breaking points and system failures
RESPONSE AND INTERVENTION:
Government policy responses and their timing
Central bank actions (rate cuts, QE, lending facilities)
Regulatory changes and emergency measures
Private sector responses and adaptations
International coordination efforts
Political dynamics affecting response
FINANCIAL IMPACT QUANTIFICATION:
Market losses across asset classes
Bank failures and bailout costs
Employment and economic output effects
Wealth destruction and distribution effects
Fiscal costs to taxpayers
Long-term economic scarring
AFTERMATH AND REFORMS:
Regulatory changes implemented
Structural market changes
Shifts in financial industry practices
Legal consequences and prosecutions
Policy lessons learned (or not learned)
Ongoing effects visible today
COMPETING NARRATIVES:
Official explanations from authorities
Industry perspectives and defenses
Academic analyses and critiques
Conspiracy theories vs. actual evidence
Ideological interpretations from different schools
What remains disputed vs. consensus
Compile data from regulatory reports, congressional testimony, court documents, academic papers, financial data providers, and investigative journalism. Note credibility levels of different sources.
INVESTMENT STRATEGY COMPREHENSIVE RESEARCH PROMPT
Build complete research foundation for [INVESTMENT STRATEGY/APPROACH] across all necessary dimensions:
THEORETICAL BASIS:
Academic research supporting the strategy
Market inefficiencies or factors it exploits
Economic rationale for why it should work
Behavioral finance principles involved
Risk premia captured by the strategy
Theoretical limits to arbitrage
HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS:
Long-term backtested returns (20+ years if available)
Performance across different market regimes
Drawdown analysis and recovery periods
Risk-adjusted return metrics (Sharpe, Sortino, Calmar)
Correlation with major asset classes
Performance during various economic conditions
IMPLEMENTATION REQUIREMENTS:
Required capital and position sizing
Trading frequency and turnover
Technology and data requirements
Research and analysis needed
Time commitment for execution
Skill level and learning curve
COST STRUCTURE ANALYSIS:
Trading commissions and spreads
Management fees (if applicable)
Tax efficiency considerations
Slippage estimates
Financing costs (if leveraged)
Hidden costs and their impact on returns
RISK PROFILE DOCUMENTATION:
Volatility characteristics
Maximum historical drawdowns
Tail risk and extreme scenarios
Correlation breakdown in crises
Capacity constraints and scalability
Specific risk factors and sensitivities
PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS:
Account minimums and requirements
Geographic availability
Regulatory restrictions
Liquidity constraints
Rebalancing requirements
When strategy may not work
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS:
Similar strategies and key differences
Combination potential with other approaches
Complementary strategies
Competitive advantages and disadvantages
Evolution and adaptation over time
Future viability considerations
EXPERT PERSPECTIVES:
Practitioners successfully using strategy
Academic researchers studying approach
Institutional adoption and experiences
Criticisms and skeptical views
Innovation and improvements to basic strategy
Common mistakes and how to avoid them
Include specific numerical data, chart examples, and case studies demonstrating strategy in action.
MARKET PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL FINANCE RESEARCH PROMPT
Compile psychological and behavioral dimensions of [FINANCIAL TOPIC] for human-centered narrative:
COGNITIVE BIASES INVENTORY:
Specific biases affecting this financial domain
How each bias manifests in investor behavior
Market impact of collective bias effects
Historical examples of bias-driven outcomes
Individual vs. institutional bias differences
Debiasing strategies and their effectiveness
EMOTIONAL DYNAMICS:
Fear and greed cycles in this market/topic
Psychological stages of market participation
Emotional responses to gains vs. losses
Stress and decision-making under pressure
Euphoria and capitulation dynamics
Long-term psychological impacts of financial events
DECISION-MAKING PATTERNS:
How investors actually make decisions
Information processing and filtering
Heuristics commonly employed
When intuition helps vs. hurts
Group dynamics and herding
Expert vs. novice decision differences
NARRATIVE AND FRAMING EFFECTS:
How financial media shapes perception
Compelling narratives that drive markets
Framing effects on investment choices
Social proof and conformity pressures
Authority bias in financial advice
Recency bias and its consequences
INDIVIDUAL INVESTOR PROFILES:
Personality types and investment approaches
Risk tolerance variations and origins
Financial socialization and background effects
Age and generational differences
Gender differences in financial behavior
Cultural influences on money psychology
BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH FINDINGS:
Key studies and their implications
Prospect theory applications
Mental accounting effects
Disposition effect documentation
Overconfidence measurements
Successful behavioral intervention strategies
Gather from academic behavioral finance research, investor surveys, trading data analysis, and psychological studies of financial decision-making.
REGULATORY AND SYSTEMIC STRUCTURE RESEARCH PROMPT
Document regulatory framework and system architecture for [FINANCIAL TOPIC/MARKET]:
REGULATORY AUTHORITY MAPPING:
Primary regulators and their jurisdictions
Regulatory mandates and powers
Enforcement mechanisms and track records
International regulatory coordination
Self-regulatory organizations (SROs)
Historical evolution of regulatory structure
KEY REGULATIONS AND RULES:
Major laws governing the topic
Specific rules and their requirements
Disclosure and reporting obligations
Capital and margin requirements
Investor protection provisions
Exemptions and special cases
ENFORCEMENT AND COMPLIANCE:
Historical enforcement actions and penalties
Common violations and their consequences
Compliance costs and requirements
Monitoring and surveillance mechanisms
Whistleblower programs and protections
Legal precedents from court cases
SYSTEMIC INFRASTRUCTURE:
Clearing and settlement mechanisms
Payment and transfer systems
Custody and safekeeping arrangements
Technology infrastructure and standards
Backup systems and redundancies
Interconnections and contagion risks
INTERNATIONAL DIMENSIONS:
Cross-border regulatory harmonization
Regulatory arbitrage opportunities
Jurisdiction shopping and its limits
International standards and agreements
Extraterritorial application of rules
Emerging market regulatory differences
REFORM DEBATES:
Current regulatory proposals and debates
Industry lobbying positions
Consumer advocacy perspectives
Academic expert recommendations
Political dynamics affecting reform
Potential future regulatory changes
Include specific regulation citations, enforcement statistics, and documented cases illustrating regulatory impact.
NARRATIVE DEVELOPMENT PROMPTS
FINANCIAL THRILLER NARRATIVE ARCHITECTURE PROMPT
Design a 2-3 hour narrative structure for [FINANCIAL TOPIC] that creates thriller-like engagement:
OPENING SEQUENCE (0-8 minutes):
Hook with high-stakes financial moment (gain, loss, or crisis)
Introduce the financial mystery or challenge to be explored
Establish personal stakes - real people affected
Preview the journey and what viewers will master
Immediate practical relevance to viewer's financial life
ACT I: THE SETUP (8-45 minutes):
Explain the financial landscape and rules of the game
Introduce key concepts through relatable examples
Present the opportunity or threat viewers will understand
Character introduction: winners, losers, and strategic players
Building blocks laid for complex concepts coming later
End: The revelation that changes everything
ACT II PART A: THE RISE (45-85 minutes):
Deep dive into strategies and mechanisms
Success stories and how they were achieved
Building complexity with comprehensible progression
Warning signs that experienced players recognize
Psychological dimensions becoming apparent
End: Peak moment before reversal or major complication
ACT II PART B: THE FALL/CHALLENGE (85-125 minutes):
What can go wrong and why
Risk manifestation and crisis development
Competing strategies and their outcomes
Psychological pressure and decision-making
System stress and breaking points
End: Critical decision point or revelation
ACT III: RESOLUTION AND MASTERY (125-180 minutes):
Synthesis of all concepts into unified understanding
Practical application framework for viewers
Long-term perspective and strategic thinking
Common mistakes and how to avoid them
Action plan viewers can implement
Future outlook and ongoing considerations
THRILLER ELEMENTS THROUGHOUT:
Information asymmetry creating suspense
Strategic thinking and chess-like positioning
High stakes and real consequences
Time pressure and urgency
Plot twists from surprising data or outcomes
Character-driven stories of triumph and disaster
PACING STRATEGIES:
Alternating between complex analysis and human stories
Building tension through escalating stakes
Strategic use of shocking facts or revelations
Cliffhangers at major transition points
Reward moments validating continued attention
Rhythm matching content intensity to cognitive load
Design for edge-of-seat engagement while delivering substantive financial education.
WEALTH-BUILDING JOURNEY FRAMEWORK PROMPT
Structure [FINANCIAL TOPIC] as a wealth-building journey viewers can follow across 2-3 hours:
JOURNEY STAGE MAPPING:
Stage 1: Foundation (0-40 minutes)
Current financial reality assessment
Mindset shifts required for wealth building
Fundamental concepts and terminology
Common myths debunked with evidence
Quick wins to build momentum
Foundation laying for advanced strategies
Stage 2: Strategy Development (40-90 minutes)
Core wealth-building principles in depth
Multiple strategic approaches compared
Matching strategies to personal circumstances
Risk management and protection strategies
Tax optimization fundamentals
Building systematic approach
Stage 3: Advanced Tactics (90-140 minutes)
Sophisticated strategies and their application
Scaling principles for growing wealth
Multiple income stream development
Advanced tax and legal structures
Dealing with complexity and higher stakes
Avoiding advanced mistakes
Stage 4: Wealth Preservation and Legacy (140-180 minutes)
Protecting accumulated wealth
Portfolio construction for longevity
Estate planning considerations
Behavioral discipline at higher wealth levels
Teaching next generation
Ongoing learning and adaptation
PERSONALIZATION FRAMEWORK:
Different paths for different starting points
Age-based strategy variations
Risk tolerance accommodation
Income level adaptations
Geographic and regulatory considerations
Time availability optimization
ACTIONABLE MILESTONE SYSTEM:
Specific actions viewers should take
Checkpoints for progress assessment
Celebration moments for achievements
Course corrections when needed
Progressive complexity in actions
Timeline expectations for realistic results
REAL EXAMPLE INTEGRATION:
Case studies at each journey stage
Different paths to same destination
Failure examples and lessons learned
Unusual success stories and their factors
Average scenarios and normal progress
Outlier outcomes and their causes
PSYCHOLOGICAL JOURNEY:
Emotional challenges at each stage
Mindset evolution required
Overcoming fear and greed
Building discipline and patience
Handling setbacks and volatility
Maintaining motivation over years
INTERACTION POINTS:
Self-assessment opportunities
Calculation exercises viewers can do
Decision frameworks to apply
Reflection prompts on personal situation
Planning worksheets and tools
Community connection opportunities
Create aspirational yet realistic journey that maintains hope while being honest about challenges and timelines.
FINANCIAL CRISIS DOCUMENTARY NARRATIVE PROMPT
Develop documentary-style narrative for [FINANCIAL CRISIS/EVENT] balancing drama with analysis:
NARRATIVE STRUCTURE:
Prologue: The Calm Before (0-15 minutes)
World at apparent peak prosperity
Seeds of crisis hidden in plain sight
Voices of warning dismissed or ignored
Everyday people about to be affected
Irony and dramatic foreshadowing
Act I: The Building Storm (15-50 minutes)
Structural weaknesses becoming apparent
Key players making fateful decisions
Warning signs accelerating
Initial cracks in the system
Point of no return approaches
Act II: The Crisis Breaks (50-95 minutes)
Triggering events and initial panic
Contagion spreading through system
Emergency responses and their inadequacy
Personal stories of devastation
System on the brink of collapse
Desperate measures and tough decisions
Act III: The Battle for Recovery (95-145 minutes)
Stabilization efforts and their effectiveness
Political and economic battles
Who pays and who profits
Structural changes implemented
Justice and accountability (or lack thereof)
New normal emerging
Epilogue: Legacy and Lessons (145-180 minutes)
Long-term consequences still unfolding
What changed and what didn't
Lessons learned or ignored
Current vulnerabilities
Personal application of crisis lessons
Preparing for the next crisis
CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT:
Villains: Those who caused or profited from crisis
Heroes: Those who warned, fought, or helped
Victims: Real people bearing the costs
Observers: Journalists, academics analyzing events
Regulators: Enforcers who succeeded or failed
Survivors: Those who navigated successfully
INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM APPROACH:
Following the money and incentives
Uncovering hidden connections
Exposing frauds or negligence
Document analysis and data journalism
Expert interviews revealing inside knowledge
Synthesizing complex information clearly
BALANCE AND FAIRNESS:
Multiple perspectives on controversial decisions
Acknowledging complexity and trade-offs
Avoiding simplistic villain narratives
Presenting evidence for competing claims
Distinguishing negligence from bad luck
Ideological balance in analysis
VISUAL STORYTELLING:
Market data visualization showing crisis
Archival footage of key moments
Locations central to events
Visual metaphors for abstract concepts
Juxtaposition showing contrasts
Timeline graphics maintaining orientation
Create compelling narrative that serves both dramatic engagement and educational value about how financial systems can fail.
STRATEGY COMPARISON AND EVALUATION FRAMEWORK PROMPT
Structure [MULTIPLE FINANCIAL STRATEGIES] as systematic comparison across 2-3 hours:
COMPARISON ARCHITECTURE:
Introduction: The Question (0-20 minutes)
The fundamental financial challenge to address
Why different strategies exist
What viewers will be able to decide by the end
Framework for evaluation to be used
Personal factors affecting optimal choice
Strategy 1 Deep Dive (20-50 minutes)
Complete explanation of first strategy
Theoretical basis and why it should work
Historical performance and evidence
Implementation requirements and costs
Risk profile and worst-case scenarios
Ideal circumstances and user profiles
Strategy 2 Deep Dive (50-80 minutes)
Complete explanation of second strategy
Theoretical basis and contrasting logic
Historical performance and evidence
Implementation requirements and costs
Risk profile and worst-case scenarios
Ideal circumstances and user profiles
Strategy 3+ Deep Dive (80-110 minutes)
Additional strategies with same depth
Hybrid approaches combining elements
Contrarian or unconventional strategies
Emerging strategies with limited track records
Head-to-Head Analysis (110-145 minutes)
Performance comparison across timeframes
Risk-adjusted returns comparison
Cost and tax efficiency comparison
Behavioral difficulty comparison
Scalability and capacity comparison
Scenario analysis (bull, bear, sideways markets)
Synthesis and Decision Framework (145-180 minutes)
No universal "best" strategy
Matching strategies to personal circumstances
Combination and diversification approaches
Evolution over life stages
Implementation prioritization
Ongoing monitoring and adjustment
EVALUATION CRITERIA:
Expected returns with confidence ranges
Volatility and downside protection
Implementation complexity and costs
Time and attention required
Behavioral sustainability
Flexibility and adaptability
Tax efficiency
Alignment with personal values
Evidence quality supporting strategy
UNBIASED PRESENTATION:
Present each strategy at its best
Acknowledge legitimate criticisms
Avoid confirmation bias toward favorite
Financial incentive disclosure
Academic vs. practitioner perspectives
Data-driven rather than opinion-driven
PERSONALIZATION GUIDANCE:
Decision tree based on personal factors
Risk tolerance assessment integration
Time horizon considerations
Capital availability requirements
Knowledge and skill assessment
Preference and value alignment
Create framework helping viewers make informed decisions rather than prescribing one-size-fits-all solutions.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
RESEARCH PHASE PROMPTS
CASE SELECTION AND VIABILITY PROMPT
Evaluate and select [CRIME CASE] for standard-length true crime video (15-45 minutes):
CASE VIABILITY ASSESSMENT:
Availability of verifiable information and sources
Sufficient narrative complexity for engaging storytelling
Clear timeline of events that can be reconstructed
Resolution status (solved, unsolved, controversial)
Uniqueness factor distinguishing from covered cases
Ethical considerations for coverage
AUDIENCE APPEAL FACTORS:
Story elements creating natural engagement
Mystery or puzzle aspects maintaining interest
Human interest dimensions beyond crime details
Educational or cautionary value
Social relevance or cultural significance
Avoidance of over-covered cases unless new angle exists
SOURCE AVAILABILITY:
Court documents and official records accessibility
Media coverage (contemporary and retrospective)
Book or documentary previous coverage
Expert commentary availability
Family statements and public interviews
Archival footage or photography
ETHICAL SCREENING:
Recent enough that families may be affected
Cases involving minors (special care required)
Victim family wishes regarding coverage
Potential for causing additional harm
Exploitation risk assessment
Respect and dignity maintenance possibility
NARRATIVE POTENTIAL:
Clear beginning, middle, and end structure
Compelling characters (investigators, victims, perpetrators)
Unexpected twists or revelations
Dramatic tension naturally present
Resolution providing satisfying conclusion
Lessons or insights that can be drawn
DIFFERENTIATION STRATEGY:
What new perspective can you offer
Untold aspects of known cases
Lesser-known cases deserving attention
New evidence or information available
Unique storytelling approach
Connection to broader themes
Select cases that balance engagement with ethical responsibility and have sufficient source material for accurate coverage.
RESEARCH PHASE PROMPTS
HISTORICAL FOUNDATION PROMPT
Create a comprehensive historical foundation document for [HISTORICAL EVENT/PERIOD/FIGURE] structured for 2-3 hour deep exploration:
CHRONOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK:
Precise timeline of key events with exact dates
Preceding historical context (50-100 years prior)
Concurrent global events affecting the narrative
Immediate aftermath and short-term consequences
Long-term historical impact and legacy assessment
PRIMARY SOURCE DOCUMENTATION:
Contemporary written accounts (letters, diaries, official documents)
Archaeological evidence and material culture
Visual sources (paintings, photographs, artifacts)
Oral histories and testimony records
Government records and official documentation
HISTORIOGRAPHICAL LANDSCAPE:
Traditional historical interpretations
Revisionist perspectives and their evidence base
Current scholarly consensus vs. ongoing debates
Methodological approaches used by different historians
Evolution of historical understanding over time
GEOPOLITICAL CONTEXT:
Political structures and power dynamics
Economic systems and trade relationships
Military capabilities and strategic considerations
Diplomatic relationships and alliance structures
Geographic factors influencing events
SOCIOCULTURAL DIMENSIONS:
Social hierarchies and class structures
Cultural values and belief systems
Daily life conditions for different social groups
Religious influences and institutional power
Technology and material conditions of the era
MULTIPLE PERSPECTIVES:
Accounts from different national/ethnic viewpoints
Class-based perspective variations
Gender perspectives where documented
Marginalized voices and alternative narratives
Contemporary opposition and dissenting views
Focus on academic sources, peer-reviewed journals, reputable historians, and primary source archives. Note areas of historical consensus vs. legitimate scholarly debate.