1. You are a total disgrace running a coverup in real-time & plain sight
2. This might have worked to prevent the release of files in Florida, Pam. But Federal law is different. The “active investigation” excuse is a FOIA exemption and FOIA applies to the public, not to Congress
3. Congress can demand documents whether or not DOJ claims there is an investigation.
4. The DOJ cannot use an investigation to refuse a valid congressional subpoena.
5. If you try to claim “ongoing investigation” as a reason the files cannot be released despite a legislative mandate, Congress can still:
—Issue subpoenas
—Hold officials in contempt
—Litigate in federal court
—Pass laws compelling production
6. Federal courts almost never allow the executive to use a fake or pretextual investigation to obstruct constitutionally mandated oversight powers.
What if Trump orders Pam to classify the documents?
Um…he could try that, sure, but:
a. Congress can declassify information by law.
This is not theoretical — Congress has done this *many* times, including on:
•The JFK files
•Russia intelligence
•The 9/11 report
•The CIA torture program docs
b. If Congress passes a law ordering the release, the president cannot veto the release itself.
He can only veto the law, and Congress can (and likely will) override him on this one.
How about if Trump simply tells the DOJ and/or FBI not to cooperate?
Again, he can and likely will try to stonewall in every way imaginable, but:
Congress has a multitude of tools/powers the public forgets about
These include:
—Inherent contempt (Sergeant-at-Arms can physically detain noncompliant officials)
—Civil enforcement (federal courts force DOJ to comply)
—Appropriations power (Congress can cut budgets until compliance)
—Impeachment and removal of any & all obstructing officials
When Congress wants something badly enough, they get it.
And here’s the key point:
The House is not voting to *obtain* the files from the DOJ. They are voting to release files Congress ALREADY HAS — files gathered during prior federal cases, grand jury materials, court filings, sealed exhibits, investigative records & communications, etc.
Bottom line:
No, Trump cannot retroactively lock down materials that are already in congressional custody (Sorry, Pam)
ALSO:
A fake “new investigation” has absolutely ZERO legal relationship to:
• Files already archived
• Files already transmitted to congressional committees
• Files already reviewed by House legal counsel
• Sealed exhibits Congress already voted to access
Here’s how Congress can still release the files even if Trump tries this stunt, which he certainly seems gearing up to:
Congress has three fully viable mechanisms to compel the release of the files
A. Pass a statute mandating the release of the files
Congress can pass a law that says:
“All files in possession of the U.S. gov relating to Jeffrey Epstein shall be released within 30 days, except for redactions required to protect minors.”
If he vetoes it, they can override.
B. Release files directly from committees
House and Senate committees have the authority to publish documents unilaterally.
Classified or unclassified.
They’ve done it before (e.g. The Pentagon Papers, The torture report, etc.)
DOJ has literally no say.
C. Release through the Speech or Debate Clause
Members of Congress can read documents into the Congressional Record on the floor of their respective chambers.
That makes them INSTANTLY PUBLIC.
And the best part of that method? The Constitution explicitly protects them from:
Trump’s WH is in full-blown panic mode because the Epstein Files bill just crossed the one threshold that changes everything: Adelita Grijalva provided the 218th signature needed to force a House floor vote.
Here’s what happens next, and why it UTTERLY TERRIFIES THEM [Thread 🧵]
218 signatures = the dam officially broke.
Quisling Mike Johnson stonewalled on swearing in Rep. Grijalva for 7 weeks FOR THIS EXACT REASON
With her signature, Massie & Khanna’s discharge petition FORCES a House vote PUTTING ALL MEMBERS ON RECORD on releasing the Epstein files
Now the House will vote on the bill itself.
Every member goes on the record as standing with the victims or the perpetrators.
And @POLITICO says Republicans are bracing for MASS DEFECTIONS.
Given 4 already bucked leadership just to force this, the floor vote is likely to pass.
Let’s walk through all the reasons this is a terrible idea.
1. As I stated above, this is not “giving money to the people.” It’s DISMANTLING THE ENTIRE STRUCTURE that makes health insurance even *remotely* affordable.
2. Those “hundreds of billions” aren’t handouts to insurance companies. They’re premium subsidies and cost-sharing reductions that go directly to lowering people’s bills.
Truman rebuilt the interior after it literally fell apart
FDR expanded the West Wing to improve workspace
Kennedy restored historic art & furniture
Obama made the building more energy efficient
None of them BULLDOZED AN ENTIRE WING to build themselves a $200 million ballroom
Trump isn’t just knocking down walls — he’s defacing our history. The White House IS NOT HIS to redecorate/destroy. It belongs to the American people. Every inch of it represents democracy, continuity, and the sacrifices made to preserve it.
Bulldozing part of the East Wing to build a personal $200 million ballroom is a grotesque display of ego and ownership. Presidents are temporary stewards of that building — not kings building a palace to immortalize and glorify themselves.
1. House Republicans pushed through an extremist reconciliation bill that has poison-pill provisions — including one that lets ACA subsidies expire at year’s end, yanking affordable health coverage from ~15 million people and hiking costs for millions more
2. The bill also included deep cuts to programs that tens of millions of Americans rely on to LIVE like SNAP, Medicaid, and renewable-energy investments — all designed to appease the MAGA hardliners and Freedom Caucus (even though MAGA actually gets screwed the *most* by these).