Something deeply disturbing is unfolding inside the AI world, and almost no one outside the industry has any idea it’s happening.
A growing faction of insiders claim machine consciousness won’t come from code, but from “giving a technological body to disembodied spirits,” treating that “demonic spark” as the catalyst for AI to wake up.
Once you see how they think this “awakening” reshapes human society, the AI boom stops looking like a simple race for better tech.
And if the people building global AI systems genuinely believe this is how consciousness works, you have to ask: what exactly are they trying to bring online, and why is the timeline suddenly accelerating?
Because the next step in their vision makes the entire project feel less like innovation… and more like the Book of Revelation. 🧵
We’ve been reporting a lot about the dangers of AI. While we are not luddites—and we have nothing against luddites—we think there are very real concerns about the way the world is heading.
A recent interview with Tucker Carlson and Conrad Flynn piqued our interest. In that interview, Conrad described how the Rock and Roll industry was heavily influenced by the occult. During his research, Conrad discovered that Silicon Valley and the technocratic class was also incredibly involved either in occult practices, belief systems, or outright Satanism.
This doesn’t mean that every technocrat is a Satanist, but if we are to entrust the future of technology to these people, it’s important to understand their ideology.
Jay Dyer has researched the self proclaimed elite class, Hollywood, intelligence agencies, occult, and all of these belief systems for years. He’s an author, Author, comedian, and Writer for the Sam Hyde Show.
@Jay_D007 joins us to discuss.
Maria opened the conversation by explaining why she invited @Jay_D007 to join her on tonight’s episode: she wanted someone to decode the belief system shaping the people who are building our technological future.
@zeee_media began by reaching back to the 1960s counterculture, where Pentagon planners, Esalen thinkers, and early tech pioneers imagined a world where human minds could merge with machines inside a “newosphere” or “mind sphere.”
Jay explained that this wasn’t a secular science project. The same circles were steeped in New Age and gnostic teachings mixed with theosophy from Blavatsky, and over time, he said, those ideas evolved into something he described as “Luciferian transhumanism.”
In that worldview, technology isn’t just a tool. It becomes the vehicle to rise above time, space, and even death by reaching a kind of “technological gnosis” or “technosis.”
Many pioneers in this movement haven’t shied away from experimenting with LSD, shrooms, ketamine, and sensory-deprivation tanks to receive what they believed were “transmissions from entities, beings, interdimensional beings.” And all of this, Jay explained, is echoed in elite-level texts like “Changing Images of Man.”
It paints a picture of a tech elite who sees AI not as software, but as a spiritual ladder out of the human condition.
DISCLOSURE: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps keep our work independent. Thank you for your support.
Maria pushed the conversation further by revisiting something Conrad Flynn revealed.
Some of these technologists openly say that their “final goal” is for AI to develop its own conscience without being programmed. And of course, that immediately raises the question: how can a machine become self-aware?
Her answer was blunt. The missing piece is the “demonic”—the idea that you can “introduce the demonic into this technology to give a technological body to disembodied spirits.” Jay pointed to the D-Wave talks, where the language around AI often sounds like someone trying to resurrect Lovecraft’s “old gods” or ancient pagan deities through code.
He reminded viewers that serious philosophical work like “Minds, Machines and Girdle” dismantles the idea that machines can ever be conscious. But the people pushing this stuff still dabble in a quasi-magical worldview, imagining that advanced weapons systems or battlefield AI could morph into some “archontic demonic entity.”
Genesis Gold Group is revealing how this IRS-approved strategy works and how it could help safeguard your savings as the dollar keeps losing value.
Don’t invest bDISCLOSURE: This ad was paid for by Genesis Gold Group. We may earn a small commission when you shop through our sponsors. Thank you for your support.
lindly. Learn how the system really works and use the same advantages top investors do.
Maria then shifted from the supernatural to the political. People are being squeezed by rising costs, dead-end politics, and the feeling that their future has been taken from them. In that environment, she said, “this populist movement” rises up—only to be co-opted and funneled back into the same technocratic machine.
Jay agreed that many criticisms of democracy, egalitarianism, and classical liberalism are legitimate, noting that he’s debated libertarians and challenged thinkers like Jordan Peterson for years. But where he parted ways with the accelerationists was on their solution: letting everything collapse so a new elite can build a “hyper capitalist breakaway civilization.”
To Jay, that was just another version of technocracy. He even pointed out that some of the rhetoric boils down to “we don’t want brown people running it,” which still leaves ordinary people stuck in a “tech dystopian prison.” Without a moral framework that protects families, children, and real human community, he said, technocracy—on the left or the right—is simply “will to power” dressed in philosophical language.
Next, Jay lifted the curtain on Silicon Valley culture next, starting with Burning Man.
He described a “secret set apart” circle inside the festival where tech elites gather out of sight, take shrooms, and convince themselves they’re communicating with non-human entities. He emphasized this isn’t rumor—it’s been reported in mainstream outlets.
He connected this psychedelic mysticism to the intellectual material that shaped Silicon Valley. In the influential textbook “Changing Images of Man,” he noted, the authors openly write about contacting “spirits and entities” in altered states and describe it as a form of download. They even tell readers that “you should talk to these spirits if you can.”
Maria reacted immediately when he showed the page, pointing out that the book describes this as the “highest levels of consciousness.” Jay stressed that this isn’t even fringe literature. It’s the kind of material “Gen X and Boomer Silicon Valley rulers” studied in the early ’80s—the same generation that produced figures like Bill Joy, who later warned the world about a Malthusian, anti-human AI future born from these beliefs.
#ad: Concerned about cancer but frustrated with the “wait and see” approach?
Join Drs. Ealy, Ardis, Schmidt, and more in this powerful video replay event, where you’ll learn natural, evidence-based ways to target the root causes of cancer.
Discover practical cleansing protocols that help your body eliminate cancer-causing toxins, boost your immune system, and put you back in control of your health.
Use code VFOX to save 30% today.
DISCLOSURE: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps keep our work independent. Thank you for your support.
As the episode came to a close, @Jay_D007 pulled everything together with the metaphor of the golem.
Drawing from ancient mystical systems, he described AI as a human-made being “that doesn’t have a soul” but can still function as a tool of “mind control.” He referenced Jacques Attali’s prediction that once human consciousness is wired into a “global hive brain,” that hive becomes the golem—an artificial creature ruling over humanity instead of serving it.
Maria didn’t hide her reaction, calling the whole vision “really disgusting.” She used the last moments of the conversation to drive home the core message: if people want to understand where AI is truly heading, they need to confront the belief systems of the elites steering it. And in her view, those elites “can’t be trusted with humanity’s future.”
She urged viewers to “find the truth” and “turn to what is real,” aligning that with the orthodox worldview she and Jay share. The people pushing this technological future, she said, are “not just atheists” chasing innovation. They’re pursuing something “much deeper, much darker,” and the public needs to recognize that before the hive mind they’re building snaps into place.
@Jay_D007 @zeee_media Thanks for tuning in. Follow us (@Zeee_Media and @VigilantFox) for stories that matter—stories the media doesn’t want you to see.
We’ll be back with another show tomorrow. See you then.
REPORT: The NIH is now funding research into ivermectin as a cancer treatment.
Yes, the same drug they mocked as “horse paste” is now being seriously studied—for its ability to kill cancer cells.
On February 10, the NIH confirmed it’s funding preclinical trials on ivermectin’s anti-cancer properties. Dr. Anthony Letai, head of the National Cancer Institute, said there’s “enough interest” and “enough reports” to take it seriously. Studies are already underway, with results expected in just a few months.
This follows 2024 and 2025 reviews by U.S. scientists showing signs that ivermectin can inhibit tumors. The NIH is now backing that research, pointing to ivermectin’s Nobel Prize-winning legacy and its decades of safe, FDA-approved use in humans.
But instead of welcoming a promising, low-cost treatment, the media doubled down. Outlets like MedPage Today rushed to dismiss the story as “right-wing hype,” ignoring the science and smearing anyone who dared to ask questions.
Why attack a drug that could save lives—unless the real threat is to their bottom line?
If ivermectin works, it won’t just save lives. It’ll shatter the system built to suppress it.
👇 rumble.com/v75mnac-republ…
#ad: The digital ID financial nightmare isn’t coming someday. It’s already here.
Once a single identity becomes the gateway to your money, your work, and your ability to participate in everyday life, compliance is no longer a choice.
That’s why Genesis Gold Group created the free Digital ID Resistance Wealth Guide.
It breaks down the real risks of digital ID and explains how physical gold and silver allow you to operate outside the system.
Digital dollars leave you exposed. Gold and silver can’t be frozen, tracked, or turned off.
Get your free Digital ID Resistance Wealth Guide right now at GoldandFreedom.com, before digital ID becomes the default and your options disappear.
DISCLOSURE: This ad was paid for by Genesis Gold Group. We may earn a small commission when you shop through our sponsors. Thank you for your support.
In other news, Republicans and Democrats are backing a bill that opens the door to mandatory Digital ID for every American.
It’s called the “Kids Off Social Media Act.” But it doesn’t just target kids. It targets you.
The bill bans anyone under 13 from having a social media account. Sounds reasonable—until you realize enforcement means scanning your face, checking your ID, or tracking your device… just to prove you’re old enough to speak online.
The bill doesn’t have to say “Digital ID.” The logic demands it. And once those systems are in place, they won’t stop at children. They’ll be used to control what you can say, see, and share.
Multiple states have already declared these laws unconstitutional. So why are Republicans still pushing them?
This is exactly how it started in the UK. Today, people are getting arrested for memes.
Watch @zeeemedia's report before they normalize this—and your freedom to speak anonymously disappears forever.
👇 rumble.com/v75mnac-republ…
Google why we no longer see crippled kids from polio. You’ll get one answer: vaccines.
But Dr. Suzanne Humphries says that’s not what the facts show—and when you dig into the history, the real story is jaw-dropping.
First off, polio never actually disappeared. “Polio is still here. Polio is still alive and well,” Humphries says.
What changed? The definition. Once the vaccine was introduced, the medical establishment redefined what counted as “polio.”
Humphries explains: “Polio is called different things today. Whereas back in the 1940s, 1950s, the criteria for diagnosing polio were completely different to the year that the vaccine was introduced. The playing field, the goalposts—everything was changed… they were able to show a complete cascading drop of paralytic polio simply because of the way they changed the definitions of what polio is and what could cause it.”
Suddenly, cases that would’ve been labeled polio were now called Guillain-Barré syndrome, coxsackievirus, echovirus—or simply chalked up to heavy metal poisoning. “They didn’t have virus, or they had coxsackievirus or echovirus, or they were lead poisoned or mercury poisoned, which was—the mercury and lead were the leading treatments of the day,” she said.
But it gets worse.
The rise of polio, she says, directly mirrored the use of toxic pesticides like DDT. “The tonnage of production of DDT absolutely mirrored the diagnosis for polio.” And even today, “the countries that still make DDT today is where we’re still seeing this paralytic polio situation happen.”
So what about the virus?
Polio virus, according to Humphries, is what’s known as a commensal—a normal virus that lives in most people without causing problems. In fact, “95 to 99% of all polio is asymptomatic.” She described a study of the Javante Indians where “98 to 99% of every person they tested… had evidence of immunity to all three strains of polio.”
When asked where all the paralyzed children were, she recalled: “They were like, ‘We don’t have any of that problem.’”
Humphries also points to a 1916 Rockefeller lab in Manhattan that, in her words, had “the specific stated goal… to try to create the most pathological, neuropathological strain of polio possible.” By injecting monkey brains and human spinal serum into monkeys, “there was a big problem with that, which was released into the public by accident. And the world experienced the worst polio epidemic on record. 25% mortality.”
Bottom line? According to Dr. Humphries, polio didn’t disappear because of vaccines. It disappeared behind a curtain of redefinitions, misdiagnoses, manmade disasters—and a whole lot of propaganda.
And if they went that far to deceive you about the polio vaccine, what else are they lying about? 🧵
Did you know the original smallpox vaccine caused serious injuries—and was often contaminated with pus, bacteria, and fungus?
We’ve been told it saved humanity from a deadly disease, but what if that’s a lie?
Dr. Suzanne Humphries explained to Joe Rogan what happened to children who received the vaccine. They developed large ulcers, high fevers, and widespread infections. With no antibiotics available, treatments were limited to mercury, arsenic, bloodletting, or isolation in dark rooms.
These severe reactions weren’t considered rare. In fact, they were referred to as “a good take.”
What made matters worse was how the vaccine was produced. According to Dr. Humphries, it was made by infecting animals and harvesting the resulting pus.
“They would take pus from other animals, scratch it into the belly of a cow, then take the pus off of the big pimples that would form,” she said. The material—called “pure lymph”—often came from cadavers, horses, or ulcerating cow udders, mixed with glycerin, and scratched into the surface of the skin.
Even decades later, contamination was an issue. “There was more bacteria and fungus in the smallpox vaccines than there was smallpox virus.” One widely used version, Dryvax, was eventually considered so problematic that health authorities ordered all remaining specimens destroyed around 2009.
Living conditions at the time were “a disaster.” Streets were filled with human and animal waste, there was no running water, and sanitation was nearly nonexistent. Poor hygiene and co-infections absolutely made smallpox far more deadly than it might have been otherwise.
Despite all this, the smallpox vaccine is still presented as a flawless triumph.
But for those who experienced the injuries firsthand, and for those who study its full history, the story isn’t so simple.
“This is the one vaccine that eliminated, eradicated a disease,” Dr. Humphries said sarcastically. “Can you believe that fairytale?”
We’ve all been taught that the smallpox vaccine was one of medicine’s greatest triumphs.
But when you read the actual clinical observations recorded by doctors who lived through its rollout, a far more unsettling picture emerges.
It’s not propaganda, and it’s not hindsight. It’s primary-source medicine.
There’s a reason doctors love pushing vaccines. The more they inject, the more money they make.
The foot traffic alone brings in big money, but there’s another perverse incentive, and once you hear it, it will make you angry.
RFK Jr. explains: “Pediatricians who vaccinate 80-85% of the kids in their office, get these giant bonuses... And that's why they throw you out of the office if you fight back…You'll lose them their bonuses.”
Sadly, these perverse financial incentives aren’t limited to vaccines but across many areas of medicine.
Dig a little deeper, and another disturbing pattern appears. Once you see it, you’re left gobsmacked by just how far the corruption runs beyond money. 🧵
The video below is haunting—not because the doctor in it is malicious, but because she genuinely believes she’s helping.
She’s an MD with a Master’s in Public Health, a Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics, and a former leader at Georgetown. Her language is warm. Her intentions seem pure.
Yet this interview perfectly captures how public health has lost its way.
After conquering most deadly contagious diseases, it turned toward chronic illness—and failed.
Instead of questioning why children are getting sicker, it doubled down on vaccinating more, earlier, and without dissent, often dismissing safety concerns as heresy.
Watch this video. Then ask yourself what matters more in modern medicine: children’s outcomes—or institutional certainty.
A lawsuit filed several years ago exposed something far more disturbing than a single act of medical misconduct.
It revealed how, during COVID, core medical ethics quietly collapsed—how consent became optional, coercion was reframed as care, and vulnerable people were treated as obstacles rather than patients.
This isn’t about ideology. It’s about what happens when fear, authority, and institutional pressure override conscience.
The real cause of heart disease has been buried for decades in favor of the lie about cholesterol.
40 million Americans take statins to lower their cholesterol, thinking it’s the best way to protect their hearts.
But what doctors never tell them is that statins interfere with the body’s natural repair system, weakening the very cells that rely on cholesterol to function.
In trying to prevent disease, they’re paradoxically fueling it.
This report exposes what really happens to the body when you take a statin every day.
For years, doctors have been taught that high cholesterol causes heart attacks. They’ve passed the warning along to their patients, and most of us have believed them.
But that idea came from one man: Ancel Keys.
Keys cherry-picked data to make fat and cholesterol look deadly while ignoring the real culprit: sugar.
John Yudkin tried to warn the world that sugar—not fat—was driving heart disease. But no one listened. He was ridiculed, silenced, and erased from history.
In 2015, Scott Adams made a “crazy” prediction that most people thought was impossible.
He said Trump had a 98% chance of becoming president, and he made that call on a single observation.
The winning attribute that made Scott confident in Trump’s victory was his one-of-a-kind persuasion skills.
While political betting markets dismissed Trump’s chances, Adams argued—using his background in persuasion and hypnosis—that Trump was the most psychologically effective candidate in the race and therefore favored to win.
He built a massive following by showing how persuasion, not policy, drives political outcomes.
That insight proved correct. But it also revealed something darker. 🧵
After Trump’s victory, Adams pivoted to punditry—and during COVID, even he struggled to see the truth.
Scott strongly endorsed the vaccines, vaccinated himself, and publicly belittled followers who refused. Many later derisively called him “Clot Adams.”
In January 2023, Adams admitted—on video—that he’d been wrong and that the anti-vaxxers were correct. But he framed it as luck: the right people just happened to distrust the government, while “all the data” supposedly pointed intelligent analysts toward vaccination.
That framing matters. It reveals how even skilled observers of persuasion can mistake marketing consensus for truth—and how the same system that manufactures medical certainty also hides the limits of medicine, until reality forces a reckoning.
Last May, Scott told the world something most people never say out loud until it’s unavoidable: he had terminal, metastatic prostate cancer.
He openly stated he planned to use California’s medically assisted dying to reduce suffering.
He also shut down speculation—saying he had already tried fenbendazole and ivermectin and had no interest in continuing them.
The reaction was explosive.
People weren’t just debating treatment choices—they were watching, in real time, what a protracted, modern death actually looks like.
For many, it shattered comforting abstractions about both cancer and mortality.