life hack Niche prompts 👇
this is the prompt bank that can make you $2k if you do it right 🧵
this is the prompt bank that can make you $2k if you do it right 🧵
RESEARCH PHASE PROMPTS (FOR CHATGPT)
science, psychology, mechanisms, constraint mapping
1. ROOT-CAUSE ANALYSIS OF A LIFE PROBLEM
“Break down the root causes of [LIFE PROBLEM] using:
PSYCHOLOGY
– cognitive biases involved
– emotional triggers
– habit loops
– motivation friction points
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
– physical setup
– social triggers
– decision fatigue
– time and energy leaks
SYSTEMIC FACTORS
– economics
– lifestyle demands
– cultural/social expectations
Finish with a short list of ‘invisible causes people never notice.’”
2. EVIDENCE-BASED LIFE HACK DISCOVERY PROMPT
“Generate a list of [NUMBER] evidence-based life hacks for [TASK/PROBLEM] supported by:
behavioral science
habit studies
cognitive load research
environmental design
productivity science
human decision-making
For each hack, include:
– the mechanism behind why it works
– the failure mode (when it stops working)
– what 95% of people do wrong
– a stronger alternative hack”
3. MICRO-SYSTEM CREATION PROMPT
“Design a repeatable micro-system for [TASK] that includes:
trigger/cue
environment setup
step-by-step loop
built-in friction reduction
built-in accountability
optimization for low-energy days
a 3-level version (bare minimum → normal → max mode)
Explain why this structure works psychologically.”
4. MYTH-BREAKER ANALYSIS PROMPT
“List the most common myths about [TOPIC], and for each:
explain where the myth came from
explain why it’s wrong
provide a correct, science-backed alternative
show who benefits from the myth staying alive
give a hack that replaces the myth”
5. FAILURE CASE DECONSTRUCTION PROMPT
“People try to improve [TOPIC] and fail. Break down:
the #1 misunderstanding
5 predictable failure patterns
emotional traps
cognitive miscalculations
environmental sabotage
social pressures
hacks that fix each failure point
Include 3 ‘blind spots’ most people never realize.”
science, psychology, mechanisms, constraint mapping
1. ROOT-CAUSE ANALYSIS OF A LIFE PROBLEM
“Break down the root causes of [LIFE PROBLEM] using:
PSYCHOLOGY
– cognitive biases involved
– emotional triggers
– habit loops
– motivation friction points
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
– physical setup
– social triggers
– decision fatigue
– time and energy leaks
SYSTEMIC FACTORS
– economics
– lifestyle demands
– cultural/social expectations
Finish with a short list of ‘invisible causes people never notice.’”
2. EVIDENCE-BASED LIFE HACK DISCOVERY PROMPT
“Generate a list of [NUMBER] evidence-based life hacks for [TASK/PROBLEM] supported by:
behavioral science
habit studies
cognitive load research
environmental design
productivity science
human decision-making
For each hack, include:
– the mechanism behind why it works
– the failure mode (when it stops working)
– what 95% of people do wrong
– a stronger alternative hack”
3. MICRO-SYSTEM CREATION PROMPT
“Design a repeatable micro-system for [TASK] that includes:
trigger/cue
environment setup
step-by-step loop
built-in friction reduction
built-in accountability
optimization for low-energy days
a 3-level version (bare minimum → normal → max mode)
Explain why this structure works psychologically.”
4. MYTH-BREAKER ANALYSIS PROMPT
“List the most common myths about [TOPIC], and for each:
explain where the myth came from
explain why it’s wrong
provide a correct, science-backed alternative
show who benefits from the myth staying alive
give a hack that replaces the myth”
5. FAILURE CASE DECONSTRUCTION PROMPT
“People try to improve [TOPIC] and fail. Break down:
the #1 misunderstanding
5 predictable failure patterns
emotional traps
cognitive miscalculations
environmental sabotage
social pressures
hacks that fix each failure point
Include 3 ‘blind spots’ most people never realize.”
NARRATIVE DEVELOPMENT PROMPTS (FOR CLAUDE)
turns science into story, friction into emotion, insights into relatability
6. THE “ONE MOMENT THAT BREAKS A HABIT” STORY PROMPT
“Turn the research below into a story about the moment someone’s life shifted.
Include:
micro-details (environment, sounds, objects)
internal monologue
emotional conflict
the hack being discovered accidentally
a small win becoming a system
the hidden psychological mechanism revealed through storytelling
Research:
[PASTE CHATGPT OUTPUT]”
7. RELATABLE CHARACTER ARC PROMPT
“Use the research below to create a character-driven narrative featuring:
a protagonist who is overwhelmed and stuck
a specific sabotaging habit
a moment of humiliation or frustration
a discovery of an unexpected shortcut
incremental wins that build momentum
emotional payoff at the end
All insights should be embedded naturally via story.
Research:
[PASTE CHATGPT OUTPUT]”
8. EMOTIONAL CONTRAST PROMPT (BEFORE v AFTER)
“Using the research below, create a before/after narrative showing:
BEFORE:
– chaos
– stress
– friction
– emotional leakage
– wasted time/energy
AFTER:
– clarity
– control
– identity shift
– an elegant micro-system
Make it cinematic yet grounded.
Research:
[PASTE CHATGPT OUTPUT]”
9. “THE HACK THAT SHOULDN’T WORK BUT DOES” PROMPT
“Turn the research below into a story about a life hack that sounds stupid, feels wrong, or looks too simple — but ends up being transformational.
Highlight:
the skepticism
the breakthrough
the underlying mechanism
why this hack bypasses normal resistance
how it scales into a life system
Research:
[PASTE CHATGPT OUTPUT]”
turns science into story, friction into emotion, insights into relatability
6. THE “ONE MOMENT THAT BREAKS A HABIT” STORY PROMPT
“Turn the research below into a story about the moment someone’s life shifted.
Include:
micro-details (environment, sounds, objects)
internal monologue
emotional conflict
the hack being discovered accidentally
a small win becoming a system
the hidden psychological mechanism revealed through storytelling
Research:
[PASTE CHATGPT OUTPUT]”
7. RELATABLE CHARACTER ARC PROMPT
“Use the research below to create a character-driven narrative featuring:
a protagonist who is overwhelmed and stuck
a specific sabotaging habit
a moment of humiliation or frustration
a discovery of an unexpected shortcut
incremental wins that build momentum
emotional payoff at the end
All insights should be embedded naturally via story.
Research:
[PASTE CHATGPT OUTPUT]”
8. EMOTIONAL CONTRAST PROMPT (BEFORE v AFTER)
“Using the research below, create a before/after narrative showing:
BEFORE:
– chaos
– stress
– friction
– emotional leakage
– wasted time/energy
AFTER:
– clarity
– control
– identity shift
– an elegant micro-system
Make it cinematic yet grounded.
Research:
[PASTE CHATGPT OUTPUT]”
9. “THE HACK THAT SHOULDN’T WORK BUT DOES” PROMPT
“Turn the research below into a story about a life hack that sounds stupid, feels wrong, or looks too simple — but ends up being transformational.
Highlight:
the skepticism
the breakthrough
the underlying mechanism
why this hack bypasses normal resistance
how it scales into a life system
Research:
[PASTE CHATGPT OUTPUT]”
SCRIPT INTEGRATION WORKFLOW
how to go from facts → story → polished script
STEP 1 ChatGPT RESEARCH
Use: root-cause, evidence-based, myth-breaker, failure-case prompts.
STEP 2 Claude NARRATIVE
Feed the research into story prompts that create the emotional arc.
STEP 3 ChatGPT FACT-CHECKING PROMPT
“Fact-check the life hack script below for:
– pseudoscience
– oversimplified advice
– incorrect psychological claims
– outdated research
– exaggerated outcomes
– missing limitations
Output:
The false or shaky claim
Correction
Real explanation
Source (study or credible article)
Draft:
[PASTE CLAUDE OUTPUT]”
STEP 4 Claude REVISION PROMPT
“Rewrite the script to integrate the scientific corrections while keeping the storytelling and emotional rhythm intact.”
how to go from facts → story → polished script
STEP 1 ChatGPT RESEARCH
Use: root-cause, evidence-based, myth-breaker, failure-case prompts.
STEP 2 Claude NARRATIVE
Feed the research into story prompts that create the emotional arc.
STEP 3 ChatGPT FACT-CHECKING PROMPT
“Fact-check the life hack script below for:
– pseudoscience
– oversimplified advice
– incorrect psychological claims
– outdated research
– exaggerated outcomes
– missing limitations
Output:
The false or shaky claim
Correction
Real explanation
Source (study or credible article)
Draft:
[PASTE CLAUDE OUTPUT]”
STEP 4 Claude REVISION PROMPT
“Rewrite the script to integrate the scientific corrections while keeping the storytelling and emotional rhythm intact.”
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
