After listening to @AuronMacintyre & @JoelWBerry on Timcast, the difference between "constitutionalist" conservatives and the new right really boils down to the fact that the new right understands the mechanisms of politics, whereas the constitutional conservatives do not 🧵
People like Joel Berry claim that there's a somewhat easy way back to a constitutional republic, but really their entire view of governance and politics are nothing more than carefully crafted propaganda pushed upon republicans in the 20th century.
Every time these debates happen, the constitutional conservative side always talks about people just finding faith, being in their Bibles, then a mass awakening will happen. Whereas the new right understands that you must actually take action to achieve your political goals.
The first step before taking effective action is actually understanding how something works, but the constitutional conservative cannot break out of the fake system that the modern American political myth is.
The constitutional conservative needs to admit that they don't understand the mechanics of politics. It's like a child trying to work on an engine. They think they can fix it, but in reality they have no understanding how it works so they just say it will "get fixed" in faith.
This is an appeal to dad, Dad will come in and fix the engine, then it will suddenly work. Dad may even say the child "fixed" the engine with their faith, but in reality Dad did the work. In the constitutionalist conservative's case, they say God will just fix it.
If you point out that God works through people and that action needs to be taken, it is treated as a lack of faith. It, is a very childlike understanding of the situation. God can fix our political situation, but it will be through great men.
The new right, really the old right, is willing to admit that modern conservatives have a complete misunderstanding of power. We have done the reading and comprehend what needs to change.
But this is where discourse breaks down, the constitutional conservative sees this as an attack on America, on the myth about our political process, and essentially an attack on God, even though it isn't, they are just ignorant.
The new right doesn't hate constitutional conservatives... until those constitutional conservatives start trying to destroy the new right by using leftist tactics and an appeal to leftist moral standards to cancel the right.
If these constitutional conservatives actually did the reading to understand what the new right is saying, I think they would figure things out because our values are aligned.... unless they are bad actors of course.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The entire point of the term "woke right" was to shut down dissent, and excommunicate emergent right wing enemies.
James Lindsay overestimated how much influence he had and the only people that backed him were devout liberals who were never right wing to begin with. 1/🧵
There were many boilerplate conservatives that backed Lindsay out of pure ignorance. It's okay, some people make mistake, but the talking heads that pushed it drew the same friend enemy distinction they claimed was evil. 2/
Now, James Lindsay is saying he was essentially cancelled, even though he was employing the same tactic himself. I guess he lost in the marketplace of ideas this go around. 3/
They do all of this under the veil of a biblical technicality that would not apply to 99.99% of real world cases. It's not about wise advice, it is consistently about appeasing women and humiliating men.
This humiliation ritual emasculates men who are not strong and holds young men back from maturing.
If a husband doesn't listen to this advice he has to sit down with a "Christian" marriage counselor and be told he is wrong in every way.
I want to bridge the gap between Boomers and Young people.
Young people are frustrated because inflation is significantly under reported by CPI and if you don't own assets, you are getting crushed. Over the past 10 years, inflation is close to 100%, not 31% like CPI says🧵
Over the past 10 years, CPI sets inflation at about 31%, in reality it is probably closer to 70-100%. This is because CPI has a few critical flaws in it:
The first major flaw is substitution. It assumes if beef is more expensive, you will buy chicken instead. This is still a reduction in quality of life, but CPI uses this trick to make inflation seem lower than it actually is.
A few thoughts on the Jubilee video that just dropped. I think this video is a good example of why rightwing rhetoric online doesn't always translate well to debates, the normiesphere, or many elite circles. 🧵
I'll start off by saying this is not any attack on anyone in the video, and I haven't watched it entirely. I'm sure many of the participants are frens. My main point is that you have to know your audience and what you are trying to achieve.
From what I watched, it seemed like most of these right wingers were trying to be edgelords similar to how they are online. This is normal because under pressure you default to your base mode of operation and they don't have much experience in the public sphere like this.
Rambo 4 is actually an incredible movie that shows just how disconnected Westerns are from understanding foreign cultures. 🧵
The movie starts off with some optimistic Christian aid workers who want to save a village in Burma from the brutal dictator/military force occupying the region.
Rambo warns them that this will solve nothing. That the only answer to the problem is removing the bad actors through force and that if they aren't willing to do that they should just go back.
How discounted cash flow analysis and time value of money has destroyed America's long term decision making.
TLDR, the value of cash 20 years or more in the future is treated as almost worthless so we never invest in critical civilizational projects. 🧵
First, what is discounted cash flow analysis and how does it work?
Discounted cash flow analysis helps companies/investors figure out what an investment is worth today based on how much money it’s expected to make in the future.
Since money today is more valuable than the same amount in the future, the model “discounts” future cash flows to their present value using a rate of return. The goal is to help investors/companies decide if the expected returns are worth the cost.