Post

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Dec 2, 2025 • 28 tweets • 11 min read • Read on X

Scrolly

The Hepatitis B vaccine is mandated for children to attend public schools in 46 states.

Hepatitis B is transmitted via needles or sexual contact, yet this vaccine is pushed on babies on their first day of life.

Why?

We finally have some answers.

Here’s the real reason every newborn is forced to get it—and why that could finally be changing. 🧵

For decades, @MidwesternDoc has tried to answer the question:

Why do we inject a vaccine meant for adult risk groups into every newborn?

The truth reveals a story of shaky science, ignored safety signals, and hidden agendas.
midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-is-every…

@MidwesternDoc The debate isn’t new. The hepatitis B vaccine has been hotly debated for years.

But the debate is getting a little more, shall we say, weird.

Check out this clip from @HighWireTalk featuring none other than Dr. Demetre Daskalakis.

Just weeks ago, former CDC director Susan Monarez seemed unable to explain why we vaccinate newborns for hepatitis B.

The hepatitis B virus is, after all, a bloodborne pathogen with transmission typically occurring through unprotected sex, blood exchanges like shared needles, and mother-to-child transmission during childbirth.

Only one of these risk factors is relevant to a newborn, but expectant mothers are typically screened for hepatitis B during their prenatal care anyway.

So why exactly do we give it to newborns? Does anyone know? Are we protecting them for a lifetime of unprotected sex and drugs? Does any protective effect from the vaccine even last that long?

The many concerns surrounding giving the hepatitis B vaccine to newborns are not unfounded. The concern is not simply a matter of being anti-vax. And concern about this vaccine certainly isn’t anti-science.

Let’s take a look at the science.

The vaccine was first introduced in the 1980s. And early warnings came fast.

Respected vaccine researcher Bohn Dunbar exposed the pattern of autoimmune complications after her own brother was injured by the hepatitis vaccine in 1994.

A 1998 article in the journal Science highlighted the growing concerns surrounding the vaccine, including the fact that attorneys representing more than 15,000 people sued France’s government for downplaying the risks and exaggerating its benefits.

France then suspended hepatitis B vaccination in schools.

A 1999 Congressional hearing laid it out:

• Numerous severe adverse reactions including death, seizures, autism, dysautonomia, MS, rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes, and liver cancer.

• Adverse reaction reports were ignored or dismissed, and short trial durations missed delayed reactions.

• Parents were not informed of the risks, newborns were vaccinated without parental consent, and parents were threatened with intervention from social services.

• Vaccinating low-risk newborns for an adult-associated disease is just plain inappropriate.

• The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program was denying most claims.

That same year, fewer than 100 U.S. children under age 2 got hepatitis B.

The math doesn’t add up. It never has.

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk Also in 1999, back when it was actually possible to find a little truth about Big Pharma on TV, ABC News aired an entire program addressing the hepatitis B vaccine.

They even included vaccine-injured patients and parents of severely injured children.

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk The untold history of the hepatitis B vaccine is jaw-dropping.

From contaminated trials to secret CDC rationales—it’s all here in @MidwesternDoc's full report:
midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-is-every…

The science is and has been stacked against this vaccine.

Studies showed hepatitis B vaccination increased the risk of MS, lupus, arthritis, and other autoimmune conditions.

In France, cases of MS spiked 65% after a national campaign. A CDC dataset showed a 12X higher autism risk when given in the first 30 days of life!

Why does the hepatitis B vaccine cause so much damage?

Autoimmune conditions caused by the vaccine are likely due to its antigen having a significant overlap with human myelin.

The molecular mimicry of the vaccine was denied because it couldn’t be proven.

A 1994 Institute of Medicine (IOM) report noted that, although preliminary data existed for many of the reactions attributed to the hepatitis B vaccine, no further research had been conducted.

Wow, thanks IOM.

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk The trials were a joke.

They monitored “side effects” for a mere 4–5 days. And the placebos they used? No, not saline—they were other vaccines or even aluminum adjuvants!

Are you kidding me??

Serious reactions—sometimes fatal—were reclassified as SIDS or coincidence.

If transmission is typically due to adult risk factors, why not give it only to adults at risk? Healthcare workers, IV drug users, and gay men with multiple partners…

Studies have shown that it can dramatically reduce cases in these groups.

Why infants? There is virtually no risk, and immunity does, in fact, wane.

So what is the point?

The CDC’s main argument is prevention of mother-to-child transmission.

But nearly all U.S. expectant mothers are screened for hepatitis B during pregnancy. And infection rates are under 0.5%!

By the numbers, millions of babies must be vaccinated to prevent a single severe outcome.

And that’s not an exaggeration.

And if mom’s status is unknown, it’s actually mandated in many states to screen newborns for hepatitis B anyway.

So why the universal newborn mandate?

A former ACIP insider revealed the dark truth:

It’s not about maternal transmission. It’s about capturing a “captive audience” in the hospital—before at-risk youth slip through the cracks later in life.

So, because the CDC was failing to reach inner-city teens, they decided to vaccinate every baby in America.

It was never, ever medically justified—it was bureaucratic convenience disguised as science.

Let that sink in.

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk The hepatitis B vaccine’s dark history will leave you speechless.

Were you vaccinated for hep B? What about your children?

@MidwesternDoc's full report is a must-read.
midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-is-every…

The history is disturbing.

The first hepatitis B vaccines were plasma-derived—actually using infected human blood. It even involved chimpanzee-human blood exchanges.

This was during the early AIDS crisis in New York, San Francisco, and LA. Remember: HIV is considered to have come from a chimpanzee virus. Sounds risky.

Merck then rushed out the first recombinant GMO vaccine in 1986.

From the start, the hepatitis B vaccine was expensive—about $145 for three doses compared to $2 for other vaccines.

Uptake was low among the high-risk groups it was meant for.

So regulators shifted strategy: add it to the childhood schedule, where government funding guaranteed sales.

By 1991, ACIP mandated hepatitis B vaccination for all newborns. By 1999, it expanded to all children and adolescents.

Parents objected. Pediatricians resisted. Even gay activists called it a failure of public health outreach.

But the CDC pressed forward—insisting it was “safe and effective” for day old newborn babies, despite what the science said.

Decades later, the outcome couldn’t be more clear.

Acute hepatitis B cases declined—but chronic hepatitis B rates never budged.

The very condition the program was supposed to eliminate hasn’t even changed since 1976.

Severe injuries from the vaccine, however, skyrocketed.

So was it worth it?

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk For the first time in decades, the ACIP is actually doing its job and reconsidering the hepatitis B newborn mandate.

This is our chance to demand change.
midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-is-every…

This isn’t just about one vaccine.

It’s about how “safe and effective” became a slogan.

How risk-benefit ratios were buried.

How the human cost was swept aside.

And how bureaucrats forced a medical intervention on every newborn infant—not for health, but for control and profit.

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk The hepatitis B saga is a warning.

When government health policy is driven by politics and profit instead of evidence, children always become collateral damage.

For decades, parents were never told the truth. Now, the cracks are showing.

This is a once-in-a-lifetime chance to correct the terrible course we’ve been on.

If you care about medical freedom, informed consent, and protecting children, now is the time to act.

Read the full report. Spread the word. Contact your Senators. Watch the ACIP hearings.

This could be the turning point.

For 30 years, America’s newborns were sacrificed to a policy that never made sense.

Will the ACIP finally end it?

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk Thanks for reading! This information was based on a report originally published by @MidwesternDoc.

Key details were streamlined and editorialized for clarity and impact. Read the original report here.
midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-is-every…

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk For a deeper dive into what modern medicine has overlooked—or intentionally buried—check out these other eye-opening reports by @MidwesternDoc:

What We’ve Learned from a Year of Vaccine Shedding Data
midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-weve-le…

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk What They Don’t Tell You About C-Sections
midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-the-don…

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk What’s The Healthiest Water To Drink?
midwesterndoctor.com/p/whats-the-he…

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk While you’re at it, give @MidwesternDoc a follow.

No one brings more research, clinical insight, or historical context when it comes to exposing the health myths we’ve all been fed.

This is easily one of the most valuable accounts you’ll ever follow.

--> @MidwesternDoc

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

More from @VigilantFox

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jul 10

Joe Rogan fell into stunned silence as Dr. Casey Means rattled off one disturbing health stat after another.

“We are getting destroyed, and it’s very recent, and it’s accelerating,” she warned.

• “74% of Americans are overweight or obese.”

• “Young adult cancers are going up 79% in the last 10 years.”

• “25% of men now under 40 have erectile dysfunction.”

• “50%, now, of American adults have type 2 diabetes or prediabetes. These were diseases where there was 1% of Americans in 1950 had type 2 diabetes. Now it’s 50% of Americans have prediabetes or type 2 diabetes.”

• “Alzheimer’s, dementia are going through the roof.”

• “Young adult dementias have increased, like, three times since 2012. So early onset dementias.”

• “One in two Americans are expected to have cancer in their lifetime now, one in two.”

• “One in [31] children has autism now, in the United States. That was one in 150 in the year 2000.”

• “In California, where I live, [Autism rates are] one in 22. One in 22 with a lifetime neurodevelopmental disorder.”

• “Infertility going up 1% per year.”

• “77% of young Americans can’t serve in the military because of obesity or drug abuse.”

• “Autoimmune diseases. Some studies are saying they’re going up 13% per year.”

• “Heart disease, which is almost totally preventable, is the leading cause of death in the United States, killing around 800,000 people per year.”

“It’s basically like all of us are a little bit dead while we’re alive,” Dr. Means said.

These aren’t unrelated crises. They share the same biological pattern — a body stuck in survival mode.

And once you understand what’s keeping your body there, the path to real healing finally makes sense. 🧵

What if what triggers chronic disease isn’t actually a malfunction?

Cells aren’t dead.

Or mutated.

Or broken beyond repair.
They’re just shut down.
What if our cells do that because they’re just trying to survive?

That single shift in perspective changes everything.

And it explains far more than modern medicine will ever admit.

It could even mean that modern medicine is going about healing all wrong.

When cells are exposed to overwhelming stress—things like toxins, infection, trauma, and immune overactivation—they do something deeply intelligent.

They conserve energy.

They reduce output.

They enter a low-function survival mode.
In the short term, this saves you.
But if your cells get stuck here, it becomes disease.

Because survival mode is not the same thing as health.

Read 27 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jul 9

For several years now, embalmers in multiple countries have reported unusual white fibrous structures being found inside the deceased.

The reports began appearing after the COVID injection rollout. Yet despite the public concern, there has been little visible effort from major health authorities to explain what these structures are, how common they may be, or what they could mean for the living.

Now, two peer-reviewed papers have pushed the issue into a more serious category. One documented survey reports from embalmers across multiple countries. The other analyzed the material itself and reported evidence consistent with amyloid-like, misfolded protein structures using Raman spectroscopy and other testing methods.

The unsettling part is not only that these structures may exist. It is that the question has been sitting in plain view for years while the institutions with the power, funding, and equipment to investigate it have largely stayed silent.

For tonight's special report, we are joined by journalist Wayne Crouch, U.S. embalmer Richard Hirschman, Major Tom Haviland, and organic chemist Greg Harrison. Together, they bring a rare mix of frontline embalming observations, multi-year survey work, investigative persistence, and analytical chemistry to one of the strangest unresolved questions of the post-COVID era. 🧵

The first major issue was the magnitude of the problem being ignored.

The embalmer survey paper did not treat the white fibrous clot phenomenon as a one-off claim from a single funeral home or a small group of activists. It gathered multi-year responses from embalmers in five countries, including the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand.

Across four years of surveys, 808 embalmers reportedly took part. Of those, 608 said they had seen the white fibrous structures. That’s more than 75% of respondents.

Even more striking was the reported frequency. These were not described as rare findings showing up once in a while under unusual circumstances. The average reported occurrence was around 23% of corpses.

That number is the kind of figure that should immediately trigger serious follow-up. Even if the exact cause remains disputed, even if some findings require further confirmation, even if additional controls are needed, the claim being raised is too large to ignore. When experienced embalmers say they began seeing something unfamiliar in bodies after 2021, the responsible response is not silence. It is investigation.

The timing also mattered. Some embalmers reported seeing unusual clotting in 2020, during the COVID era but before the vaccine rollout. However, the larger reported increase appeared in 2021, after the rollout began.

That distinction is important because it keeps the question broader than a single theory. The issue being raised is not only whether the injections played a role, but whether spike protein exposure from infection, injection, or both may be connected to abnormal clotting and protein misfolding.

At this stage, the survey did not prove causation. But it did document a pattern that many embalmers said they had not seen during decades of prior work.

And that is exactly why the matter should not be left to online debate alone.

Unless you have explicitly told your financial advisor to pull your money out of tech, you are fully invested in the AI bubble right now.

Nobody asked for your permission. Nobody had to.

Your 401(k) is on autopilot, and autopilot means the biggest names on Wall Street get to use your retirement to fund their AI bets. Larry Fink’s BlackRock alone manages $12 trillion of money just like yours.

If it pays off, they take the fees. If it pops, you hold the bag.

But there’s a way to opt out of the AI bubble, and Genesis Gold shows you how.

They put together a free guide with the whole picture. How exposed your retirement really is. What happens after the crash. And how to get your hard-earned money out before the bomb goes off.

Get it now at DailyPulseGold.com. That’s DailyPulseGold.com.

Read 10 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jul 6

A New York Times reporter did the unthinkable and exposed the “worst test in medicine” — the one that five decades of evidence says doesn’t work.

The research is damning: continuous fetal monitoring raises C-sections by 66% and instrumental deliveries by 16%, with no drop in infant deaths or disability.

It flags a problem that usually isn’t one, and doctors rush to cut the baby out.

It’s not just a false flag problem; it’s a money incentive. Sarah Kliff says the quiet part out loud:

“Nobody gets sued for doing the C-section. You only get sued for not doing the C-section.”

Doctors are so terrified of legal consequences that they’ll push unnecessary surgery on their patients, not for the baby’s health, but to protect their pocketbooks.

That’s how the cascade starts. In a hospital delivery, one intervention triggers the next. It’s like an avalanche that can’t be stopped.

Next thing you know, you’re recovering for weeks from a major surgery you never needed.

If someone you love is about to have their first baby, share this before they ever set foot in a labor and delivery unit.

@MidwesternDoc investigated what hospitals don’t tell you about birth outcomes, and it only gets worse from here. 🧵

For most of human history, childbirth happened at home, guided by a midwife who had already done this hundreds of times.

Today it’s one of the most heavily monitored, medicated, and surgical events in modern medicine.

Something clearly changed, and it’s not women’s bodies. They’re just as capable today as they were thousands of years ago.

But today, most parents walk into a delivery room having no idea what may happen next—or why.

This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below.
midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-hidden-d…

Read 34 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jul 5

Big Pharma is “terrified” of Vitamin D, and Dr. Pierre Kory says he could spend a whole hour on this topic.

Why so scared?

Because “It threatens the DISEASE MODEL.”

A meta-analysis out of Italy found what happens when people take Vitamin D, and the results are staggering:

Looking at data from 19 different studies and 1.26 million individuals, the meta-analysis revealed:

• Vitamin D showed about a 60% effectiveness against the incidence of COVID-19 in randomized control trials.

• Vitamin D showed about 40-50% effectiveness in reducing the incidence of COVID-19 in observational studies.

• For preventing severe COVID-19 cases requiring ICU care, vitamin D supplementation was about 70% effective.

We didn’t need to lock ourselves inside for years, live in fear, and vilify our neighbors for not wearing a mask.

That was literally the worst thing we could have done.

All we ever needed was to go outside, get sunshine, and raise our vitamin D, and everything would have been so much better.

But the sunshine story goes far beyond COVID. You think you’re doing your health a favor by avoiding the sun?

The data tells a very different story, and it starts with 29,518 women who did exactly that. 🧵

For decades, Americans were told to treat the sun like poison.

Avoid it. Block it. Fear it. Wear sunscreen every day, everywhere, even when it’s cloudy.

But sunlight isn’t just a lifestyle preference.

It’s a biological necessity.

And the campaign against it may be one of the most successful and profitable fear campaigns in modern medicine.

Their message is simple:

Sunlight causes skin cancer.
Skin cancer can kill you.
Therefore, avoid the sun.

That sounds reasonable until you ask one question: What kind of skin cancer are we talking about?
Because “skin cancer” isn’t just one thing.

And with that simple question, the narrative starts to fall apart.

Read 32 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jul 1

If you thought COVID was built on a web of lies, wait till you hear what they did with Alzheimer’s disease.

While Big Pharma poured billions into failed drugs and fake plaque theories, one neurologist quietly proved the decline could be reversed.

And he did it without a single pharmaceutical.

Dr. Dale Bredesen discovered Alzheimer’s has five root causes, not one.

And when you treat those root causes, patients recover. 🧵

This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below.

midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-great-al…

In 1906, plaques in the brain were identified as the cause of Alzheimer’s disease.

By the 1980s, scientists discovered that those plaques were primarily composed of amyloid proteins.

And then in 1991, genetic mutations in a protein that gives rise to amyloid beta were linked to inherited forms of Alzheimer’s disease.

Read 30 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jun 29

At 17, Amy Tippins was dying of liver failure. A transplant saved her life.

After the surgery, she noticed “some of my traits had changed.”

Amy suddenly found herself drawn to hands-on home projects she’d never cared about.

“What gives?” she thought. So she tracked down the obituary of the stranger whose liver she’d received and discovered something staggering:

“Not long after surgery, some things about myself and some of my traits had changed… I really started to love projects like replacing flooring on my own. I never saw flooring being put in. I never saw anything like that being done.”

“I knew he was 47 and that he had been killed in a car wreck in Columbus, Georgia. So I went to the library and I started looking up obituaries for that time. And I backed into his obituary.”

“What I discovered is he was a police officer. He was 47, and his name was Mike. His sister told me that he did a lot of his own home renovation. He also liked to work with his hands. He liked to do projects.”

“When I found out who my donor was, it made a lot more sense on why some things about myself and some of my traits had changed after transplant.”

Is a donated organ just an organ? Or can it actually change who you are?

Conventional medicine laughs at the idea. But is it really so crazy?

Let’s take a look at the evidence. 🧵

When organ transplantation became possible, doctors called it a miracle. And it is. Giving someone a second life through another person’s death is incredible.

But the full story isn’t quite so simple.

Oftentimes, something else seems to come with the organ. Something nobody signed up for.

The standard model is pretty straightforward. Your heart is a pump. Your kidney is a filter. Personality and memory live in the brain, and nowhere else.

Swap a failing organ for a healthy one and you’ve simply updated the plumbing, not the person.

But that’s been nothing more than an assumption.

For decades, a significant number of cases has been building up that say otherwise.

This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below.

midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-mystery-…

Read 30 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @VigilantFox

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!