Post

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Dec 2, 2025 • 28 tweets • 11 min read • Read on X

Scrolly

The Hepatitis B vaccine is mandated for children to attend public schools in 46 states.

Hepatitis B is transmitted via needles or sexual contact, yet this vaccine is pushed on babies on their first day of life.

Why?

We finally have some answers.

Here’s the real reason every newborn is forced to get it—and why that could finally be changing. 🧵

For decades, @MidwesternDoc has tried to answer the question:

Why do we inject a vaccine meant for adult risk groups into every newborn?

The truth reveals a story of shaky science, ignored safety signals, and hidden agendas.
midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-is-every…

@MidwesternDoc The debate isn’t new. The hepatitis B vaccine has been hotly debated for years.

But the debate is getting a little more, shall we say, weird.

Check out this clip from @HighWireTalk featuring none other than Dr. Demetre Daskalakis.

Just weeks ago, former CDC director Susan Monarez seemed unable to explain why we vaccinate newborns for hepatitis B.

The hepatitis B virus is, after all, a bloodborne pathogen with transmission typically occurring through unprotected sex, blood exchanges like shared needles, and mother-to-child transmission during childbirth.

Only one of these risk factors is relevant to a newborn, but expectant mothers are typically screened for hepatitis B during their prenatal care anyway.

So why exactly do we give it to newborns? Does anyone know? Are we protecting them for a lifetime of unprotected sex and drugs? Does any protective effect from the vaccine even last that long?

The many concerns surrounding giving the hepatitis B vaccine to newborns are not unfounded. The concern is not simply a matter of being anti-vax. And concern about this vaccine certainly isn’t anti-science.

Let’s take a look at the science.

The vaccine was first introduced in the 1980s. And early warnings came fast.

Respected vaccine researcher Bohn Dunbar exposed the pattern of autoimmune complications after her own brother was injured by the hepatitis vaccine in 1994.

A 1998 article in the journal Science highlighted the growing concerns surrounding the vaccine, including the fact that attorneys representing more than 15,000 people sued France’s government for downplaying the risks and exaggerating its benefits.

France then suspended hepatitis B vaccination in schools.

A 1999 Congressional hearing laid it out:

• Numerous severe adverse reactions including death, seizures, autism, dysautonomia, MS, rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes, and liver cancer.

• Adverse reaction reports were ignored or dismissed, and short trial durations missed delayed reactions.

• Parents were not informed of the risks, newborns were vaccinated without parental consent, and parents were threatened with intervention from social services.

• Vaccinating low-risk newborns for an adult-associated disease is just plain inappropriate.

• The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program was denying most claims.

That same year, fewer than 100 U.S. children under age 2 got hepatitis B.

The math doesn’t add up. It never has.

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk Also in 1999, back when it was actually possible to find a little truth about Big Pharma on TV, ABC News aired an entire program addressing the hepatitis B vaccine.

They even included vaccine-injured patients and parents of severely injured children.

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk The untold history of the hepatitis B vaccine is jaw-dropping.

From contaminated trials to secret CDC rationales—it’s all here in @MidwesternDoc's full report:
midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-is-every…

The science is and has been stacked against this vaccine.

Studies showed hepatitis B vaccination increased the risk of MS, lupus, arthritis, and other autoimmune conditions.

In France, cases of MS spiked 65% after a national campaign. A CDC dataset showed a 12X higher autism risk when given in the first 30 days of life!

Why does the hepatitis B vaccine cause so much damage?

Autoimmune conditions caused by the vaccine are likely due to its antigen having a significant overlap with human myelin.

The molecular mimicry of the vaccine was denied because it couldn’t be proven.

A 1994 Institute of Medicine (IOM) report noted that, although preliminary data existed for many of the reactions attributed to the hepatitis B vaccine, no further research had been conducted.

Wow, thanks IOM.

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk The trials were a joke.

They monitored “side effects” for a mere 4–5 days. And the placebos they used? No, not saline—they were other vaccines or even aluminum adjuvants!

Are you kidding me??

Serious reactions—sometimes fatal—were reclassified as SIDS or coincidence.

If transmission is typically due to adult risk factors, why not give it only to adults at risk? Healthcare workers, IV drug users, and gay men with multiple partners…

Studies have shown that it can dramatically reduce cases in these groups.

Why infants? There is virtually no risk, and immunity does, in fact, wane.

So what is the point?

The CDC’s main argument is prevention of mother-to-child transmission.

But nearly all U.S. expectant mothers are screened for hepatitis B during pregnancy. And infection rates are under 0.5%!

By the numbers, millions of babies must be vaccinated to prevent a single severe outcome.

And that’s not an exaggeration.

And if mom’s status is unknown, it’s actually mandated in many states to screen newborns for hepatitis B anyway.

So why the universal newborn mandate?

A former ACIP insider revealed the dark truth:

It’s not about maternal transmission. It’s about capturing a “captive audience” in the hospital—before at-risk youth slip through the cracks later in life.

So, because the CDC was failing to reach inner-city teens, they decided to vaccinate every baby in America.

It was never, ever medically justified—it was bureaucratic convenience disguised as science.

Let that sink in.

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk The hepatitis B vaccine’s dark history will leave you speechless.

Were you vaccinated for hep B? What about your children?

@MidwesternDoc's full report is a must-read.
midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-is-every…

The history is disturbing.

The first hepatitis B vaccines were plasma-derived—actually using infected human blood. It even involved chimpanzee-human blood exchanges.

This was during the early AIDS crisis in New York, San Francisco, and LA. Remember: HIV is considered to have come from a chimpanzee virus. Sounds risky.

Merck then rushed out the first recombinant GMO vaccine in 1986.

From the start, the hepatitis B vaccine was expensive—about $145 for three doses compared to $2 for other vaccines.

Uptake was low among the high-risk groups it was meant for.

So regulators shifted strategy: add it to the childhood schedule, where government funding guaranteed sales.

By 1991, ACIP mandated hepatitis B vaccination for all newborns. By 1999, it expanded to all children and adolescents.

Parents objected. Pediatricians resisted. Even gay activists called it a failure of public health outreach.

But the CDC pressed forward—insisting it was “safe and effective” for day old newborn babies, despite what the science said.

Decades later, the outcome couldn’t be more clear.

Acute hepatitis B cases declined—but chronic hepatitis B rates never budged.

The very condition the program was supposed to eliminate hasn’t even changed since 1976.

Severe injuries from the vaccine, however, skyrocketed.

So was it worth it?

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk For the first time in decades, the ACIP is actually doing its job and reconsidering the hepatitis B newborn mandate.

This is our chance to demand change.
midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-is-every…

This isn’t just about one vaccine.

It’s about how “safe and effective” became a slogan.

How risk-benefit ratios were buried.

How the human cost was swept aside.

And how bureaucrats forced a medical intervention on every newborn infant—not for health, but for control and profit.

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk The hepatitis B saga is a warning.

When government health policy is driven by politics and profit instead of evidence, children always become collateral damage.

For decades, parents were never told the truth. Now, the cracks are showing.

This is a once-in-a-lifetime chance to correct the terrible course we’ve been on.

If you care about medical freedom, informed consent, and protecting children, now is the time to act.

Read the full report. Spread the word. Contact your Senators. Watch the ACIP hearings.

This could be the turning point.

For 30 years, America’s newborns were sacrificed to a policy that never made sense.

Will the ACIP finally end it?

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk Thanks for reading! This information was based on a report originally published by @MidwesternDoc.

Key details were streamlined and editorialized for clarity and impact. Read the original report here.
midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-is-every…

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk For a deeper dive into what modern medicine has overlooked—or intentionally buried—check out these other eye-opening reports by @MidwesternDoc:

What We’ve Learned from a Year of Vaccine Shedding Data
midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-weve-le…

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk What They Don’t Tell You About C-Sections
midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-the-don…

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk What’s The Healthiest Water To Drink?
midwesterndoctor.com/p/whats-the-he…

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk While you’re at it, give @MidwesternDoc a follow.

No one brings more research, clinical insight, or historical context when it comes to exposing the health myths we’ve all been fed.

This is easily one of the most valuable accounts you’ll ever follow.

--> @MidwesternDoc

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

More from @VigilantFox

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Mar 21

RFK Jr. told Tucker Carlson the CDC buried its own internal study showing a 1135% INCREASE in autism risk from hepatitis B vaccination.

The researchers were shocked.

So they covered it up.

How?

“They got rid of all the older children essentially and just had younger children who are too young to be diagnosed [with autism].”

Imagine discovering evidence of catastrophic harm and making sure no one ever found out.

Then telling everyone it’s “safe.”

Forget what Dr. Fauci or your AI chatbot tells you.

Here’s what the real data shows about the risks and benefits of 11 vaccines still in use today. 🧵

The information in this report comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and eye-opening details, read the full article below:

midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-are-the…

If you think vaccines are perfect, you’ve bought into a myth.

Vaccines are marketed as safe and effective silver bullets. But many don’t prevent infection, fail to stop transmission, and carry real, underreported risks.

The bar for justifying most vaccines is nowhere near as high as it should be.

Read 42 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Mar 20

Something shocking just happened and barely anyone is talking about it.

Tucked within the 2026 Farm Bill is an alarming provision. Farmers who adopt AI and precision agriculture technologies will be reimbursed for it—90% of the total cost. And the standards governing this tech won’t be set by the USDA, but by the tech industry itself.

An article from Fortune titled ‘The 2026 farm bill quietly hands big tech control over American farmland. Here’s the fine print’ reads:

Tucked inside the 2026 Farm Bill is a provision that would reimburse farmers 90% of the cost of adopting AI and precision agriculture technologies—15 percentage points above the normal EQIP cap.The private sector standards governing those technologies would be set not by the USDA, but by the tech industry itself.This could be a Trojan horse of sorts for something called “precision agriculture” and artificial intelligence (AI), which big tech firms will be able take advantage of farmers and further wrest control over the food system from them.

The article goes on to describe precision agriculture, saying:

Not only is precision agriculture defined, but it is complemented by a list of what are deemed appropriate technologies, including GPS, yield monitors, data management software, and the particularly strange sounding, “Internet of Things and telematics technologies.”That last bizarre phrase, which most would probably consider a typo, is actually a concept that abounds in tech company circles. One definition from an industry leader notes that the “Internet of Things,” or IoT, is the “network of physical objects — “things” — that are embedded with sensors, software, and other technologies for the purpose of connecting and exchanging data with other devices and systems.”

You read that right. They’re connecting your food to AI.

Paired with this definition is the government opening the way for corporations to have, well, a “field day” with precision agriculture, including for AI. Tucked away in the Rural Development Title, is the “promoting precision agriculture” subsection. AI, we are told particularly, is to be guided by “private sector-led interconnectivity standards, guidelines, and best practices.”

In short, this is a Big Tech takeover of our food supply.

But what does that really mean?

According to the proponents of Agenda 2030, of which Big Tech are, they want us to consume zero meat and zero real dairy, everything must be bioengineered, and our food must contain vaccines.

While we’ve seen legislative efforts to stop that from occurring, but when private companies with billions of dollars to spare on lawsuits seize control of the food supply and you have no options left, guess what happens?

mRNA lettuce. And bioengineered everything.

They even admit the aim is to have the food connected to AI. Thus, consuming it would presumably connect you and your loved ones to AI, too.

Not only is this a privacy and complete control nightmare technocrats of old could have only dreamed of, this opens up a range of issues for a whole host of diseases humans will undoubtedly start to suffer from, because this will not be real food.

Joining us now to discuss one of the solutions to metabolic health and the increased threat on it is Ryan Richardson. 🧵

Maria opened the interview by asking a bigger question, why does it feel so hard for people to actually get healthy?

She pointed to recent efforts to change vaccine schedules being blocked and said it feels like “everything is poised against humanity” when it comes to breaking free from what’s making people sick in the first place.

From there, she shifted the focus to what people are experiencing outside that system. More and more individuals, she explained, are finding answers elsewhere, which suggests something important isn’t being addressed.

That’s when Ryan stepped in and brought it down to something much more basic.

He explained that a lot of what we’re dealing with today may come down to what’s missing, not just what’s wrong. Using vitamin B17 as his example, he said it used to be naturally present in everyday foods—for generations. But it has largely disappeared from our modern diet.

And in Ryan’s view, that’s not just a small detail.

It’s the starting point.

He believes several nutrients have been stripped from our food over time, but one stands above the rest in terms of impact.

“Vitamin B-17 is the most important.”

#ad: Want protection from surveillance, hacking, and even electromagnetic threats?

The elite Faraday bags at escapezone.com/pulse block GPS, Bluetooth, RFID skimming, and EMF—perfect for phones, laptops, wallets, and more.

Their premium ballistic backpack even combines Faraday shielding with Kevlar armor, giving you the upper hand in an unpredictable world.

Want to shield your body, too? Try their EMF-blocking beanies and blankets—because protection shouldn’t stop with your phone.

Whether it’s for you, your family, or someone you love—don’t leave it to chance.

Shop now at escapezone.com/pulse and protect what matters most.

DISCLOSURE: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps keep our work independent. Thank you for your support.

Read 9 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Mar 20

The 50-Year-Old Cancer Miracle Hiding in Plain Sight

Back in 1968, the FDA discovered something incredible: a common dye combined with DMSO (Dimethyl Sulfoxide) could destroy cancer cells without harming healthy ones.

Instead of fast-tracking this breakthrough, they chose to bury the evidence.

But now, as @MidwesternDoc shows, doctors have proven this combination works—safely treating otherwise “incurable” cancers. 🧵

DMSO—or Dimethyl sulfoxide—was discovered in the 1960s and quickly gained medical recognition.

It turns out DMSO has a shocking ability to treat everything from inflammation and stroke to autoimmune diseases and even cancer. midwesterndoctor.com/p/hundreds-of-…

The dye used in combination with DMSO was Hematoxylin, a natural extract traditionally used for staining tissue under a microscope.

When doctors combined it with DMSO, they witnessed something extraordinary: aggressive, recurring cancers began to vanish.

It worked even in cases where standard treatments had failed. The results were so promising, they should’ve launched a new era of cancer care.

Read 35 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Mar 19

This 75-year-old, who had been blind since birth, suddenly regained his sight after using DMSO to cure sinusitis.

Ten years ago, doctors gave up on him: “There’s really nothing I can do.”

But when he used DMSO to treat his sinusitis, he “became aware of the fact that [he] could see color with [his] left eye, which [he] found to be interesting.”

“I can see color quite distinctly now. I can see detail,” Murray said.

“I can count fingers, which I could never do before.”

DMSO has repeatedly been shown to help heal eye issues medicine still can’t solve, like blindness and macular degeneration, while also reducing floaters and cataracts.

But helping the eyes is just the surface of what DMSO can do.

Because once you dig deeper, you start to see that many diseases we’ve been told are “incurable” may not be after all. 🧵

For decades, a simple compound has been quietly linked to diseases medicine still calls “incurable.”

Autoimmune disorders. Fibrotic conditions. Degenerative diseases tied to protein damage. Even rare conditions where the body slowly hardens into immobility.

What makes this unusual isn’t one study, it’s how often it keeps appearing across completely different categories of disease.

Sadly, most people have never even heard of it.

For decades, DMSO has mostly been framed as a fringe solvent with odd medical lore attached to it.

But the truth is DMSO treats a wide range of issues and it’s much, much bigger than pain relief. In fact, it’s such a useful tool that it’s been hidden from us for decades.

This incredible tool can treat inflammation, fibrosis, protein misfolding, and even some of the “incurable” disorders medicine manages rather than solves.

Read 32 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Mar 17

The McCullough Foundation reviewed 300 studies, and they found the #1 risk factor for autism to be “combination vaccines.”

“There are more children in the United States today with profound autism — completely disabled — than there ever were with polio,” he lamented.

“We’ve, in a sense, caused a major public health crisis through this vaccine ideology.”

But it’s not just the profound autism that’s showing up.

In a survey of approximately 13,000 people, one result about gender identity stood out immediately.

“It doesn’t prove causation. But it is a signal that large is difficult to ignore.” 🧵

Something strange has happened in modern medicine.

For decades, vaccine debates focused on obvious adverse events like allergic reactions or acute neurological injuries.

But a quieter question has lingered in medical literature: could vaccines sometimes cause subtle neurological changes that alter behavior, personality, or emotional development?

What happens when people report sudden personality shifts, or changes in emotional bonding, or even changes in sexual attraction following vaccination?

When signals appear, we’re suppose to pause and look a little deeper—not dismiss them because they’re uncomfortable.

But that’s exactly what society does when things like autism and gender identity are involved.

Are there links between vaccination, human connection, autism, and sexual orientation? If we don’t stop to ask these questions, we’ll never know the answers.

Researchers have historically focused on dramatic vaccine injuries like seizures or encephalitis while overlooking smaller neurological effects.

But something is quietly breaking human connection at the deepest level and we have to get to the bottom of what’s causing it.

Romantic partners feel distant.
Intimacy lacks real passion or spontaneity.
Emotional warmth is harder to find.
And gender confusion has exploded, especially in the young.

This isn’t random. It’s the result of neurological changes. And some of those changes may be triggered by mass vaccination.

For more than a century, evidence shows vaccines cause wide-ranging neurological and autoimmune disorders, including autism and middle ear infections.

Read 26 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Mar 17

DISTURBING: Peter Thiel is hosting secret Antichrist lectures in Rome, setting up a collision course with the Pope while advancing the very AI systems causing many to fear the future.

Behind closed doors, the Palantir founder is warning of a “one-world state,” as critics stress his very own technology is helping build it in real time.

Following similar invite-only sessions in California, Thiel is now gathering elites at undisclosed locations in Rome, with no recordings allowed, where he frames tech regulation as a path to the Antichrist. He even claims that warning about the catastrophic risks helps bring them about, but his critics say that logic is backwards.

Voices within the Catholic world are calling this a direct challenge to the Pope’s push for AI restraint.

So why the secrecy, and what are they planning?

@zeeemedia's report reveals what’s really at stake.
👇
rumble.com/v777k8q-tucker…

In other news, Tucker Carlson says the CIA is preparing a criminal referral against him after reading texts he sent to Iran, as a growing rift within MAGA intensifies.

He insists this was just routine journalism—part of his job. But critics are framing it as a potential national security issue, and conflicting reports are only adding to the uncertainty.

Carlson says he isn’t concerned—but should he be?

What actually set this off, and why it escalated so quickly, becomes much clearer in @zeeemedia's report. 👇
rumble.com/v777k8q-tucker…