Although man only was created on the sixth day, as resurrected one he was already present on the first, because of which the first day was called "yom echad" = day one
Rashi:
Why does it write אחד “one”? Because the holy one, blessed be he, was only one (יָחִיד "yachid") in his world, since the angels were not created until the second day.
"Im hebräischen Urtext stünden nicht die Substantive "Mann" und "Frau" ("isch" und "ischah"), sondern die Adjektive "männlich" und "weiblich" ("zakar" und "neqebah"), so Schwienhorst-Schönberger. Das ändere jedoch nichts am Gesamtverständnis (...)"katholisch.de/artikel/47430-…
Jedoch er hat nicht gut gelesen
Genesis 2:23,
"wajomer haadam" und der Mensch (der männlich und weiblich Geschaffene) sagte: "(...) und diese wird Frau, "ischah" genannt werden, denn diese ist vom Mann ("mei-isch") genommen
Genesis 3:6,
"wateirè haischah" - und die Frau (die weibliche Seite des Menschen) sah dass de Baum gut sei zum Essen, us.w. sefaria.org/Genesis.3.6?la…
The numerical value of Genesis 1:1, i.e. the sum of the values of the 28 lettters with which it is written, is 2701, a remarkable number since 2701 = triangle 73
Just that he went into the mist with comparing Hebrew gematria with Greek to claim that it is about Jesus Christ:
Word 7 (translated ‘earth’) has the value 296 (= 8x37) – and, most appropriately, we find this to be a factor of both Name and Title of the Lord Jesus Christ
But there is some other thing about it, viz. that in the first verse of Genesis there is mentioning of "elohim" and not of "hashem"