🚨
The ACLU's Chase Strangio pretends to be binary in an interview with NYT's @DouthatNYT
Some notes on her rebrand from me, a professor of Strangiology ...🧵
2. In Bostock, SCOTUS vaguely banned anti-trans discrim at work.
Do employers have to let men into the women's changing room? Or does Bostock just protect the men's right to have female names?
ACLU argues employers must pretend workers are the sex they say they are. Biden's EEOC moved to ban women-only changing rooms and "misgendering" at work, citing Bostock.
Strangio doesn't want NYT subscribers to know all that so she just talks about men fired for having the name Mary.
3. What is gender?
Sorry to be a broken record but it's important.
4. Strangio's agenda in court is to "destabilize" the M/F binary. She's admitted this.
She herself identifies as nonbinary.
She represents NB clients suing Trump to be recognized as NB.
In June, SCOTUS ruled that religious parents have a right to opt their K-5 children out of "LGBTQ" lessons. The case is Mahmoud.
In Mass., the governor and a private firm are advising schools they can practically ignore Mahmoud. 🧵
2. Governor's guidance portrays Mahmoud as a narrow decision.
Instead of admitting parents are entitled to opt out, she says they can't be prevented from opting out.
Instead of admitting it's a broad decision, she emphasizes it's fact-dependent.
3. The right way to advise clients on Mahmoud would be:
"See what Montgomery County did to Mahmoud? Don't do that!"
You'd list the 5 books at issue, because you know they require opt out, and quote specific SCOTUS language about why they're problematic, to help identify other lessons that might require opt out.
"I was a dope, OK ... Focus on the overall message I'm giving."
Stella and Mia's interview of Gordon Guyatt is incredible. My notes 🧵
@stellaomalley3 @_CryMiaRiver
(BTW these 2 have very different reactions to Guyatt's epic admission.)
2. Guyatt is trite about pediatric gender med (PGM). Nothing new here if you've met a buffoon before.
✅ "Multidisciplinary assessments" are key
✅ "My knowledge is superficial"
✅ Cuts off knowledgeable interlocutor
✅ Certain that PGM should be allowed badfacts.substack.com/p/the-psycholo…
3. Guyatt analogizes gender med to "early HIV care."
But doctors have been treating "gender" for 60+ years.
HIV researchers have figured out prevention, detection, and treatments proven to save lives.
Parents have a constitutional right to opt their young children out of "LGBTQ" lessons for religious reasons. SCOTUS declared this in June in Mahmoud v. Taylor.
SPS has not updated its policy 🧵
2. SPS mandates LGBTQ lessons "for the purpose of increasing kindness."
Mahmoud rejects this idea. The lessons inevitably teach kids what to think about sex and "gender identity."
3. ACLU lawyers don't want trans rights to be based on whether someone has had medical interventions. Just "identity."
But in sports cases like BPJ they argue it matters when boys are puberty-blocked. It's just easier to win that way. They can build on the precedent later.
Fetishists and certain butch lesbians in the 90s used the vogue for privilege hierarchies to argue they were more oppressed than gays who passed. A weird & narcissistic project.