1/ 🧵 EXPLAINED: “BRICS gold-backed currency” (the UNIT) — and why stackers should care.
Lots of noise. Some signal. Here’s the clean version.👇
2/ First: BRICS has NOT officially adopted a single common currency (despite years of headlines). Even BRICS officials have repeatedly emphasized national-currency settlement over a new shared currency.
3/ So what is “UNIT” actually?
UNIT is best described as a proposed settlement / unit-of-account concept linked to a basket:
✅ gold + ✅ BRICS currencies often tied to the IRIAS framework — but not an official BRICS policy instrument.
4/ The core idea proponents push:
Measure currencies in gold terms (gold as the reference), not gold in currency terms.
That’s a philosophical flip — and it matters if it ever scales.
5/ Why stackers care even if it’s “just a pilot / concept”:
Because any trade instrument that anchors to gold nudges the world toward:
➡️ more gold in reserves
➡️ more gold in settlement thinking
➡️ less blind faith in paper IOUs
6/ Now connect the dots to the REAL driver:
Capital markets are enormous. Metals are tiny.
SIFMA: global fixed income ~$145T (2024), global equity mkt cap ~$126.7T.
7/ That means even a small asset reallocation from bonds/equities into physical metal can move price violently.
This is Jensen’s whole point: the “repricing” isn’t mystical — it’s math.
8/ Meanwhile, the plumbing is already creaking.
Reuters documented a London silver tightness / liquidity crunch (and how little “free” metal is actually available because much is tied up/allocated).
9/ Translation:
When everyone realizes “paper claims” ≠ “metal on demand,” the market doesn’t gently adjust…
…it gaps.
10/ Add fundamentals:
UBS has discussed a very large silver deficit outlook for 2026 (hundreds of millions of ounces) in a ~1.34B oz demand framework.
11/ So why do bullion banks keep calling “the top”?
Because if you’re structurally committed to paper leverage, your job is to:
🗣️ talk it down
📄 roll it forward
🧯 manage confidence
(Price discovery is inconvenient.)
12/ Here’s the stacker takeaway:
If a gold-referenced settlement concept gains traction at the same time London/COMEX tightness shows up…
…you get a feedback loop:
more demand → more stress → higher price → more demand.
14/ Bottom line:
Whether “UNIT” becomes real policy or not, the direction-of-travel is clear:
🌍 the world is experimenting with settlement outside the dollar
🥇 gold keeps creeping back into the monetary conversation
🥈 and silver… is the tiny market with the biggest torque
15/ Stackers:
you’re not early because you guessed a date.
You’re early because you chose the asset that breaks paper games when trust cracks.
🔁 Repost if you want the “paper vs physical” crowd to read something uncomfortable.
#Silver #Gold #BRICS #SoundMoney #PreciousMetals
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🚨 The LBMA “Silver Surge”: What the Numbers Really Tell Us
Over the past three months, LBMA claims its silver vaults have suddenly gained 83.7 million ounces.
That’s 2,600 metric tons.
To put this in perspective:
That is the equivalent of two large silver mines magically appearing — without a single miner, refinery, or logistics company noticing.
In real commodity markets, that simply does not happen.
1. Such a massive “increase in inventories” is statistically impossible
83.7 million ounces is not a rounding error.
It’s a global-scale event — the kind that would hit mining news, industrial procurement channels, and bullion trade desks everywhere.
Yet the global market saw zero corresponding physical flows.
When numbers leap like this without real-world evidence, it’s not supply — it’s accounting.
2. The physical market shows the exact opposite trend
While LBMA vaults supposedly ballooned:
SGE inventories continue to fall by tens of tonnes per week
India is importing record volumes of silver
The US Mint is struggling to source blanks
Industrial users report shortages of high-purity silver
A real surplus would ease physical stress across all these channels.
🧵 THREAD: What the CFTC COT Delay Really Means (and why stackers should care)
1/ The CFTC just announced something unprecedented:
They’re delaying future COT reports because they must finish pastones first.
This isn’t just bureaucracy.
This is a market signal.
2/ Reminder:
The COT (Commitments of Traders) report is the X-ray of the futures market.
It shows:
who’s adding big shorts
who’s taking physical-leaning longs commercial hedging behavior when the paper market tightens and when someone is trying to hide footprints
When the X-ray goes dark → transparency disappears.
3/ The official excuse?
“Government funding lapse from Oct 1 to Nov 12.”
Okay…
But look at when this happens:
extreme daily volumes
chaotic COMEX OI revisions (two weeks ago)
elevated EFP/cash settlement
registered inventories bleeding
and price still refusing to break down
Right in the heat of the storm… the lights go out.