🧵 To put into perspective the war crimes committed by Sec. Pete Hegseth, we have to go back to Vietnam, 1968. One of the most horrific war crimes in history was committed. (cont)
#ProudBlue
#ResistanceRoots
#USDemocracy
#Voices4Victory firstpost.com/explainers/his…
On March 16, 1968, U.S. soldiers of Charlie Company, 23rd Infantry Division, entered the hamlet of My Lai in South Vietnam. Expecting Viet Cong fighters, they instead encountered civilians. Soldiers murdered between 347–504 civilians, including women, children, and the (cont)
elderly. Many were raped, tortured, or mutilated. Helicopter pilot Hugh Thompson (below) tried to stop the killings, even threatening to fire on U.S. troops to protect villagers. Hugh Thompson IMO is one of the unsung heroes of the Vietnam War. (cont)
The Army covered it up for nearly 20 months. When exposed, Lt. William Calley (below) was the only one convicted. He served just 3 years under house arrest after Nixon commuted his sentence. The question remains: was he a war criminal or scapegoat?(cont)
My Lai became a symbol of the moral collapse of U.S. conduct in Vietnam. It fueled antiwar protests and forced reforms in military ethics and rules of engagement. But, in 2025, it appears any reforms in U.S. military ethics fell by the wayside.(cont)
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ordered U.S. forces to “kill everybody” aboard a suspected drug-trafficking boat in the Caribbean — including survivors clinging to wreckage. A second strike was allegedly ordered to ensure no one lived. (cont)
Legal experts argue such an order violates the laws of armed conflict. Congress has launched bipartisan investigations, with some lawmakers calling it a likely war crime. Hegseth denies the order. Of course he's denying it & attempting distancing himself from the incident.(cont)
The parallel is chilling: indiscriminate killing of non-combatants, cover-ups or denials, and the erosion of public trust in military leadership. My Lai reshaped military training around ethics. The Hegseth case may force a similar reckoning today.(cont) alonereaders.com/article/detail…
Both incidents remind us: when leaders abandon restraint, atrocities follow. From Vietnam to the Caribbean, the lesson is clear — unchecked orders to “kill everybody” lead to moral collapse. The past is prologue.
Eventually, the bill comes due.
#KeepItWoke
#DedicataedToTam✡️🕊
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵 In June 1979, suburban Pennsylvania erupted. Cars burned, businesses looted, police injured. This wasn’t Philly or NYC — it was Levittown, the model suburb of the American Dream. Pull up a 🪑. (cont)
The Levittown Gas Riots of 1979 were a violent eruption of frustration in suburban Pennsylvania, sparked by fuel shortages and economic decline. The riots were triggered by the second OPEC oil boycott in 1979, which caused gasoline shortages, (cont)
long lines at pumps, and skyrocketing prices. Levittown, a postwar suburb built on the promise of affordable homes and steady industrial jobs, was hit hard by mass layoffs at local steel plants and rising unemployment. Residents, dependent on cars and cheap fuel, felt (cont)
🧵 One of the first things Trump did when he returned to the the Presidency was bring back the portrait of Andrew Jackson to the Oval Office. Why? They have a lot in common.(cont)
#ProudBlue
#ResistanceRoots
#USDemocracy
#Voices4Victory historynewsnetwork.org/article/trump-…
From Jackson's Indian Removal Act to Trump's mass deportation policies, I will break down the similarities in both. In 1830, President Andrew Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act. It authorized the U.S. government to force Native nations off their ancestral lands east(cont)
of the Mississippi. It led to one of the darkest chapters in American history. Indigenous people were marched westward in brutal conditions. This became known as the Trail of Tears—tens of thousands died from disease, starvation, and exposure.(cont)
🧵 Did you know a Black woman stood up against a notorious gangster? Stephanie St. Clair, aka Madame Queen, was a Caribbean immigrant who built a gambling empire in Harlem during the 1920s–30s. (cont)
She wasn’t just a crime boss — she was a community protector and outspoken critic of corruption. Born in Guadeloupe, she arrived in New York and quickly saw how mainstream banks excluded Black residents. Her solution? The "numbers racket", (cont)
an underground lottery that became Harlem’s financial backbone. St. Clair’s operation gave jobs and economic power to Harlem’s Black community. She became known as the Numbers Queen, respected and feared at the same time.
🧵Linda Gottfredson is an American psychologist and white supremacist who is best known for her work on intelligence, occupational achievement, and race differences in IQ. (cont)
#ProudBlue
#ResistanceUnited
#USDemocracy
#Voices4Victory wikiwand.com/en/articles/Li…
In the 1980s–90s, Gottfredson argued that average IQ differences between racial groups were partly genetic. She claimed that these differences explained disparities in education, employment, and social outcomes. Her research was funded by the Pioneer Fund, a foundation (cont)
established in 1937 with ties to eugenics and white nationalist ideology. The fund supported scholars who promoted hereditarian theories of intelligence. She co-authored the 1994 Mainstream Science on Intelligence statement, signed by 52 researchers(cont)
🧵 Jared Taylor calls himself a “race realist.” In reality, he’s nothing more than a white supremacist who built American Renaissance into a hub for extremists. (cont)
Taylor’s American Renaissance conferences aren’t just academic gatherings. They’ve hosted Ku Klux Klan members, neo-Nazis, and white nationalist leaders — giving them a platform under the guise of “intellectual debate.” (cont)
Taylor uses the term “race realism” to argue that racial differences are biological and justify segregation or hierarchy. This is a rebranding of scientific racism, a discredited ideology. Although Taylor insists on calling himself a “race realist,” this is essentially (cont)
🧵 What happens when science is misused to justify prejudice? Enter J. Philippe Rushton — one of the most infamous figures in the history of scientific racism.
He collected data on dick size! 🫢
(cont)
#ProudBlue
#ResistanceRoots
#USDemocracy
#Voices4Victory
Rushton was a Canadian psychologist at the University of Western Ontario. He was also a white supremacist. He later became head of the Pioneer Fund — an organization notorious for supporting eugenics and race-based research. In his 1995 book titled (cont) splcenter.org/resources/extr…
"Race, Evolution, and Behavior", Rushton argued that racial groups differ in intelligence, crime, sexuality, and even genital size. He claimed these differences were evolutionary. He actually told this to the only Black student his class.(cont) cbc.ca/news/canada/lo…